Skip to main content
  1. Home
  2. Social Media
  3. News

Zuckerberg: Facebook wouldn’t have fact-checked Trump

Add as a preferred source on Google
 

As President Donald Trump lashes out at Twitter for fact-checking two of his tweets and prepares an executive order targeting social media companies, Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg has weighed in — on Trump’s side.

Recommended Videos

In an interview with Fox News set to air Thursday, May 28, Zuckerberg said that his social media company has “a different policy than Twitter on this.”

“I just believe strongly that Facebook shouldn’t be the arbiter of truth,” Zuckerberg told The Five co-host Dana Perino. “I think in general private companies — especially these platform companies — shouldn’t be in the position of doing that.”

Trump and many Republicans have criticized Twitter over the fact-check messages on Trump’s tweets about mail-in voting, which alerted users to “get the facts” after Trump made an unsubstantiated claim that mail-in voting would lead to rampant voter fraud. Trump accused Twitter of censoring him and other conservative voices and vowed to take action against social media companies.

“Twitter has now shown that everything we have been saying about them (and their other compatriots) is correct,” Trump tweeted Wednesday morning. “Big action to follow!”
The White House later announced that Trump will sign an executive order on social media companies, which analysts expect will target Section 230, a piece of legislation that protects social media companies from being liable for the content that users post on their sites. Stripping this immunity would put Twitter, Facebook, YouTube and many other platforms at risk of a deluge of lawsuits from users.
Trump hinted at the executive order again Thursday morning.
“This will be a Big Day for Social Media and FAIRNESS!” he tweeted.
Twitter CEO Jack Dorsey has stood by his company’s decision to add the fact-checking message.
“Our intention is to connect the dots of conflicting statements and show the information in dispute so people can judge for themselves,” Dorsey tweeted. More transparency from us is critical so folks can clearly see the why behind our actions.” Dorsey asked critics to focus their attention on him, as conservative commentators had targeted a Twitter executive for years-old tweets that criticized Trump.
“There is someone ultimately accountable for our actions as a company, and that’s me,” Dorsey wrote. “Please leave our employees out of this. We’ll continue to point out incorrect or disputed information about elections globally. And we will admit to and own any mistakes we make.”
Dorsey also pushed back against Zuckerberg’s remarks. “This does not make us an ‘arbiter of truth,'” he said.
For his part, Trump seems to have noticed Zuckerberg’s comments; Trump retweeted a Republican pollster’s post about Zuckerberg’s interview that included the operative’s take on Zuckerberg’s comment: “An obviously true statement.”
Paul Squire
Former Digital Trends Contributor
Paul is the News Editor at Digital Trends. Before joining DT, Paul spent 3 years as an editor on the New York Post's digital…
Child abuse material continues to surface on X despite Elon Musk’s promises
New investigation claims several previously flagged child abuse images were found on X.
X-logo

Elon Musk once called removing child sexual abuse material from X his top priority. Yet new investigations suggest the platform still struggles to keep known abusive content offline. Reviews by The New York Times and the Canadian Center for Child Protection found previously flagged material on X, while Grok generated sexualized images involving children earlier this year.

Grok generated images involving known abuse victims

Read more
Researchers warn that social media can reveal sensitive details about users
Social media activity can reveal your politics, religion, and shopping habits, researchers warn
Social Media

What you post online is only part of the story. A new review of research into social media privacy warns that platforms and third parties can potentially infer sensitive details about people from seemingly ordinary digital activity, including their political opinions, religious leanings and shopping habits.

The findings, as reported by Techxplore, published in the International Journal of Management Concepts and Philosophy, point to a widening gap between the amount of personal information generated online and the legal and ethical protections designed to safeguard it. The researchers examined privacy breaches, regulatory frameworks, and the responsibilities of both social media companies and their users.

Read more
Instagram scammers are holding creators’ accounts hostage with copyright strikes
Meta’s copyright system is being weaponized against the creators it’s supposed to protect
A person holding a phone with the Instagram app open on it.

Imagine waking up to find your Instagram account suspended because someone claims you stole their content. You might know that the claim is false, but appealing it could take weeks. If you're a content creator, each day offline could cost you money. Meanwhile, the person behind the complaint offers to make the problem disappear for just a few hundred dollars.

According to a new BBC investigation, Instagram creators are being hit with this new online racket. Scammers are filing bogus copyright complaints and demanding payment to withdraw them, exploiting the fact that repeated claims can put an account at risk of suspension. The account owner may still have their password and login credentials, but that does little good when their content or account has been taken offline.

Read more