Skip to main content
  1. Home
  2. Social Media
  3. News

Facebook’s wants to turn basic link sharing into a paid feature

A new hurdle for creators driving traffic from Facebook

Add as a preferred source on Google
Facebook App
Unsplash

Facebook has begun experimenting with charging for one of its most basic features, link sharing. In a new test spotted by users, Meta is limiting how many links certain Facebook accounts can post unless they pay for a subscription.

Users who are part of Facebook’s professional mode or who run Pages can only post two links in regular posts unless they subscribe to Meta Verified. The paid plan starts at $14.99 per month in the US.

Recommended Videos

This change lands as new research highlights how deeply Facebook is still woven into everyday online habits. It could have a direct impact on creators and businesses that use Facebook to share articles, products, or drive traffic elsewhere on the internet.

Why is Facebook putting limits on link sharing?

Meta confirmed the experiment and told TechCrunch that it is a “limited test” meant to understand whether the ability to post more links adds extra value for Meta Verified subscribers. While Meta states that publishers are not currently included in the test, many creators rely on professional mode profiles and Pages to reach their audiences.

According to social media strategist Matt Navarra, links in comments are still allowed, as well as affiliate links and links to other Meta-owned platforms such as Instagram and WhatsApp.

Facebook’s own data may help explain the thinking. In a recent transparency report, Meta said more than 98% of feed views in the US come from posts without links. Posts with links account for a small share of views and are mostly seen from Pages that users already follow.

Navarra told the BBC that the move signals Meta’s broader push to monetize content distribution itself, calling it “the basic ability to send people to other parts of the internet” being placed behind a paywall. “Tests like this underline why building a business that’s overly dependent on any one platform’s goodwill is incredibly risky,” he said.

Such tactics are not new. Platforms like X have previously downplayed linked posts to keep users on their own services longer, and turned the verification checkmark into a monthly subscription. For now, this is still a test. But it adds to growing concerns of a future where even simple actions on social platforms may come with a price.

Manisha Priyadarshini
Manisha Priyadarshini is a tech and entertainment writer with over nine years of editorial experience.
X’s creator payouts are changing, and original content is the new currency
The platform is replacing Revenue Sharing with a program designed to reward creators who actually make something.
X Twitter on iPhone

X is changing the rules for creators yet again. This time, the platform wants to put less emphasis on simply generating engagement and more on actually making something original. X is replacing its controversial Creator Revenue Sharing program with a new initiative called Original Content Rewards, which will officially launch on September 8, 2026. The existing Revenue Sharing program will continue paying participating creators through September 7, after which the new system takes over.

X wants to reward creators, not engagement farmers

Read more
Snapchat’s Spotlight algorithm now favors human-made videos over AI-generated ones
Snapchat is taking a firm stance against AI slop.
Snapchat-App-Store-open-on-iPhone

If you've been uploading fully AI-generated videos on Snapchat in hopes of earning rewards, it might be time to rethink your strategy. Snapchat has announced changes to Spotlight that prioritize authentic, original creativity over content created entirely by artificial intelligence. The company says its recommendation system will now favor videos made by real creators, while fully AI-generated submissions will no longer qualify for monetization.

So what's changing on Spotlight?

Read more
LinkedIn is crowdsourcing its fight against AI slop
The company is rolling out a new button that lets you flag posts that seem AI generated.
LinkedIn seems like AI slop button

LinkedIn has a serious AI slop problem, and it's now turning to its own users to help fix it. The platform is rolling out a new button that lets users flag posts they suspect were generated by AI. It plans to use that feedback to fine-tune the system that decides how much reach a post gets outside a user's own network, based on how AI-generated it appears.

The announcement comes shortly after an analysis by Pangram found that more than forty percent of long-form LinkedIn posts are fully AI-generated, and it suggests that the reach-trimming measures the company rolled out earlier this year haven't been enough on their own.

Read more