Skip to main content
  1. Home
  2. Social Media
  3. News

Facebook’s privacy-focused clear history tool is set to land in 2019

Trevor Mogg
By

Facebook says it will launch its long-awaited “clear history” privacy tool this year, but it still can’t put a precise date on its rollout. The feature, which will give Facebook users more control over personal data connected to third-party websites and apps, was first announced by the social networking giant in May 2018.

The idea for the tool came in response to 2018’s damaging Cambridge Analytica scandal that saw the personal data of tens of millions of Facebook users harvested by third-party apps for political purposes.

Recommended Videos

Speaking this week at the Morgan Stanley Tech, Media and Telecom Conference in San Francisco, Facebook chief financial officer David Wehner confirmed that the tool will be made available before year-end.

Related

Facebook chief Mark Zuckerberg described the feature in a post on his personal page in 2018, explaining that it will work in a similar way to how you clear cookies from your web browser. Cookies are small files that a website stores on your computing device and contain data about your browser or login data. Businesses find them particularly useful because they help to target ads, though they also serve other purposes.

Zuckerberg wrote that just as with a web browser, you’ll be able to flush your Facebook activity history from the social networking site whenever you like.

“Once we roll out this update, you’ll be able to see information about the apps and websites you’ve interacted with, and you’ll be able to clear this information from your account,” Zuckerberg said in the post. “You’ll even be able to turn off having this information stored with your account.”

But he said that clearing the data could adversely affect parts of your Facebook experience, citing as an example, having to sign back into every website that you were previously automatically logged into.

The Facebook boss described the upcoming clear history tool as “something privacy advocates have been asking for — and we will work with them to make sure we get it right.”

Specific details on how the tool will function are yet to be revealed, but for Facebook users concerned about privacy, the feature should offer more peace of mind when it comes to controlling personal data online.

As for Facebook, it’s well aware that the tool has the potential to hit its bottom line as it would compromise its ability to effectively target ads, but this ultimately depends on how many people decide to make use of it.

Editors' Recommendations

Topics
Trevor Mogg
Trevor Mogg
Contributing Editor
Not so many moons ago, Trevor moved from one tea-loving island nation that drives on the left (Britain) to another (Japan)…
Period-tracking apps are sharing people’s intimate data with Facebook
Facebook Logo

Some period-tracking apps are sending Facebook personal information about the women who use them.
In order to work, the apps require women to enter information about their menstrual cycle as well as information about their sexual activity. According to a report released Monday by the United Kingdom-based advocacy group Privacy International, a number of those apps then share that information with Facebook, Buzzfeed reports.
Specifically, the group said the apps MIA Fem and Maya sent information about women’s use of contraception, when their monthly periods were, and whether or not they experienced symptoms like cramps and swelling to the social network. 
For some perspective, the app Maya currently has over 5 million downloads. The makers of MIA say that it has more than 2 million users around the world. We've reached out to the developers of both apps for comment and additional details on how they use user data, but have yet to receive a response. Maya's owner, Plackal Tech, told Buzzfeed that it doesn't share any personally identifiable data or medical data with Facebook. 
Data is being shared with Facebook through the social network’s Software Developer Kit (SDK). The SDK allows developers to collect user data so Facebook can show users targeted ads. Beyond being used for advertising, the data can also be collected by Facebook and used outside of the social network.
Facebook has reportedly reached out to the developers of both apps to discuss how they are potentially violating the company’s terms of service. Facebook requires app developers to disclosed to users what information -- if any -- is being shared with Facebook. In the case of the two apps, it seems like that is not happening. The fault in this particular situation appears to be with the app developers, not the social network.
Privacy, in general, has been a growing concern as it pertains to Facebook, specifically following the Cambridge Analytica scandal. The Federal Trade Commission fined Facebook $5 billion over its use of private data in the wake of the scandal.
During court proceedings for a class-action lawsuit focused on Cambridge Analytica, the company’s lawyer, Orin Snyder, said that there is “no expectation of privacy” on Facebook.
“There is no invasion of privacy at all, because there is no privacy,” Snyder said while trying to convince U.S. District Court Judge Vince Chhabria toss out the lawsuit. Snyder argued that users had given consent to share their data with third parties. “You have to closely guard something to have a reasonable expectation of privacy,” he said.
Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg has made a number of statements over the past year stressing the company’s desire to make a privacy-focused social platform.

Read more
The EU could hit Facebook with billions in fines over privacy violations
Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg

Facebook may be facing some hefty fines from the EU.
The European Union is reportedly nearing the end of its investigation into some of the cases it opened against Facebook under the EU’s General Data Protection Regulation or GDPR, the Wall Street Journal reports.
In total, Ireland’s Data Protection Commission, which is leading the investigation since Facebook’s HQ in Europe is in Dublin, has 11 cases against the social network.
Some of those cases have been finalized to a point where the Commission has passed along its final investigative reports. Decisions, along with any proposed fines and sanctions, are expected to be near completion by the end of September.
If you’re not familiar, GDPR is a set of data privacy laws in the EU designed to give EU citizens more control over their personal data and how it is collected, stored, and used.
The law went into effect on May 25, 2018. We wrote a detailed primer on the law that can help explain things.
Even though Facebook is based in the United States, GDPR laws apply to the company since its service is used by individuals in the European Union.
The cases against Facebook are among the first GDPR cases to involve companies based in the United States. The results of the case could ultimately have an impact on privacy laws and regulations in the United States as well.
Under the GDPR, fines for violations can be up to 4% of a company’s worldwide revenue for the preceding year. In the case of Facebook, that could reach to $2.23 billion.
The EU didn’t provide much information about which cases it was nearing completion on. However, it did name one case, which involves whether Facebook gives WhatsApp users sufficient information about what it shares with Facebook proper.
In July, Facebook settled with the Federal Trade Commission in the United States over privacy violations, a settlement that required the social network to pay $5 billion, the largest fine in FTC history.
While that fine is a lot of money, to put things in perspective, Facebook earned $16.6 billion in revenue during the first three months of 2019.

Read more
Privacy group sues FTC, says $5 billion Facebook fine is chump change
Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg

Earlier this week Facebook settled with the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) over privacy violations to the tune of $5 billion, the largest fine in the history of the FTC. While certainly huge, one privacy group thinks that the $5 billion fine isn’t quite enough.
The Electronic Privacy Information Center, known as EPIC, filed a lawsuit against the FTC regarding the settlement on Friday, saying that it is "insufficient to address the concerns originally identified by EPIC and the consumer coalition, as well as those findings established by the Commission.”
The group wants the FTC to “require Facebook to restore the privacy settings users had in 2009; give users access to all of the data that Facebook keeps about them; stop making facial recognition profiles without users' consent; make the results of the government privacy audits public; and stop secretly tracking users across the web.”
It also wants the amount of the fine to be increased. While $5 billion is a large amount, it is a small penalty for the $571 billion company.
“The proposed order wipes Facebook’s slate clean without Facebook even having to admit guilt for its privacy violations,” reads the group’s complaint to the FTC.
“EPIC supports the findings in the FTC Complaint and supports, in part, the directives contained in the Consent Order. The Order makes clear that companies should not engage in unfair and deceptive trade practices, particularly in the collection and use of personal data. However, the proposed Order is insufficient to address the concerns originally identified by EPIC and the consumer coalition, as well as those findings established by the Commission.”
Many other critics also felt the settlement didn't go far enough. The two Democrats on the commission voted against it -- with and one commission, Rohit Chopra, criticized it for not holding senior executives like CEO Mark Zuckerberg or COO Sheryl Sandberg personally accountable for the violations.

https://twitter.com/chopraftc/status/1154010758138736640
In addition to the $5 billion fine, the FTC is requiring Facebook to submit to new restrictions as well as a modified corporate structure that will hold the company accountable for decisions it makes about its user’s privacy.
While it certainly could have been higher, the $5 billion fine is almost 20 times higher than the largest privacy or data security penalty ever imposed worldwide, says the FTC and is one of the largest penalties ever assessed by the U.S. government for any violation.

Read more