Skip to main content

Google blocks ex-employee’s ‘Social Circles’ book

Social CirclesEx-Googler and now Facebook product manager Paul Adams is supposedly the man behind Google Circles – and Google is doing everything to keep you from hearing about it. Adams has written a book called Social Circles, and claims that Google is blocking it from being published. Via his blog, Adams explains he left Google because the company was a better fit for engineers. Being on the research and design end of things, Adams felt his talents would be better suited for Facebook. “Google values technology, not social science,” he says.

But even though Adams doesn’t really have a bone to pick with Google’s corporate infrastructure, the fact that the company is blocking his book is another matter. “I wrote the book in collaboration with Google, and in June 2010 they officially gave me permission to publish it. The book content, the title, and the cover all exited prior to Emerald Sea (Google+).” Adams says that after the media caught wind of the project in summer 2010, Google took back its go-ahead on the book and asked him to hold off until after Google+ officially launched. And now that it is, Google still won’t give Adams the right to publish his book and has been ignoring his emails.

Recommended Videos

So what’s the book about? Given Google’s reaction, you might think it’s a sordid tale about the company’s constant struggle to create a social network and possibly about the inner turmoil along the way – maybe even why Google is inept when it comes to social media. But there’s no tabloid or scandal attached to Adams book: It focused on “the complex body of academic research about social behavior and to make it accessible to the many designers, developers and markets who need to know this stuff. The industry needed this book.”

While it sounds more like a textbook, maybe Google just doesn’t want its competition getting its hands on what stands to make it a lot of money. Another ex-Googler, Dhanji Prasanna, who has more palpable ire for the company, points out that Adams did a presentation called Real Life Social Network while Google was developing Circles and the rest of Google+. The presentation was made public, which Adams says Google was aware of. However, Prasanna says that this presentation and Adams departure to Facebook resulted in the creation of Facebook Groups, a direct play off of Google Circles. Of course, Groups isn’t as core to Facebook as Circles is to Google+, but perhaps the scare was enough for Google to halt Social Circles’ publication.

And while some might assume that Adams’ move to Facebook had anything to do with the pre-Google+ introduction of Facebook Groups, he says this is not the cause. Via Quora, Adams says he and all Google employees who defected signed a non-disclosure agreement and he respected this. “I didn’t breathe a word about Google+ to anyone at Facebook. In fact, Facebook were [sic] very pro-active in ensuring that I don’t [sic] mention anything to anyone internally.”

Molly McHugh
Former Social Media/Web Editor
Before coming to Digital Trends, Molly worked as a freelance writer, occasional photographer, and general technical lackey…
Bluesky finally adds a feature many had been waiting for
A blue sky with clouds.

Bluesky has been making a lot of progress in recent months by simplifying the process to sign up while at the same time rolling out a steady stream of new features.

As part of those continuing efforts, the social media app has just announced that users can now send direct messages (DMs).

Read more
Reddit just achieved something for the first time in its 20-year history
The Reddit logo.

Reddit’s on a roll. The social media platform has just turned a profit for the first time in its 20-year history, and now boasts a record 97.2 million daily active users, marking a year-over-year increase of 47%. A few times during the quarter, the figure topped 100 million, which Reddit CEO and co-founder Steve Huffman said in a letter to shareholders had been a “long-standing milestone” for the site.

The company, which went public in March, announced the news in its third-quarter earnings results on Tuesday.

Read more
Worried about the TikTok ban? This is how it might look on your phone
TikTok splash screen on an Android phone.

The US Supreme Court has decided to uphold a law that would see TikTok banned in the country on January 19. Now, the platform has issued an official statement, confirming that it will indeed shut down unless it gets some emergency relief from the outgoing president.

“Unless the Biden Administration immediately provides a definitive statement to satisfy the most critical service providers assuring non-enforcement, unfortunately TikTok will be forced to go dark on January 19,” said the company soon after the court’s verdict.
So, what does going dark mean?
So, far, there is no official statement on what exactly TikTok means by “going dark.” There is a lot of speculation out there on how exactly the app or website will look once TikTok shutters in the US.

Read more