Skip to main content
  1. Home
  2. Social Media
  3. Web
  4. Legacy Archives

The terrible, horrible, no good, very bad Titstare app pitch

Add as a preferred source on Google

There are a lot of stupid apps out there, ranging from just dumb to wildly offensive. People with bad ideas and big ambition are hard to stop, which is why Lulu exists and Ashley Madison is a thing. But most people in the tech world don’t expect major conferences like the TechCrunch Disrupt hackathon to provide a platform for pure idiocy.

Apparently no one told Australian programmers Jethro Batts and David Boulton that you shouldn’t come to a Hackathon and spew nonsense ideas that sound like they were generated by a rejected tweet from Men’s Humor, because they took the stage as they day’s first presenters and launched Titstare with the deranged confidence of 10 year-old science fair contestants who forgot to complete their assignment and are now trying to pass off a hamster ball split in half and duct-taped together as a new sports bra for women. It’s lazy, completely misguided attempt at making something for women. 

Recommended Videos

And yes, you read that right. They launched an app called Titstare. It that collects images of people (men) looking at breasts. 

Now, the whole thing was a joke, but a profoundly unsuccessful one. For starters, it wasn’t funny, which is the biggest problem a joke can have. The joke didn’t seem to have a target — it wasn’t a satirical bit about tech culture’s tendency to objectify women, it didn’t have any discernible comment on anything. If anything, women who are resistant to being reduced to their chests were the targets. 

Compounding the problem of Titstare being un-funny and tinged with misogyny, the hapless Aussie programmers also suffered from an extremely poor choice in venue. Maybe if they’d created a Web video for the product, it would’ve been more warmly received on The Chive… but they chose a major tech event. Considering pretty much everyone else (including a brilliant nine year-old) at the hackathon was attempting to promote services and tools they had worked hard to make and genuinely wanted to be successful, this boring, crappy joke presentation looked extra inappropriate. 

It was also a bad choice because the whole thing just reinforces the brogrammer cliche. And according to my Kiwi friend, it also reinforces the whole boorish Australian cliche. 

TechCrunch has already apologized for the tacky presentation, promising to be more diligent in reviewing who they put onstage. The apology referenced another presentation that simulated masturbation. 

If you feel like spending your Monday lunch break hate-watching something, here’s the presentation in all of its horrible glory: 

Kate Knibbs
Former Contributor
Kate Knibbs is a writer from Chicago. She is very happy that her borderline-unhealthy Internet habits are rewarded with a…
X’s creator payouts are changing, and original content is the new currency
The platform is replacing Revenue Sharing with a program designed to reward creators who actually make something.
X Twitter on iPhone

X is changing the rules for creators yet again. This time, the platform wants to put less emphasis on simply generating engagement and more on actually making something original. X is replacing its controversial Creator Revenue Sharing program with a new initiative called Original Content Rewards, which will officially launch on September 8, 2026. The existing Revenue Sharing program will continue paying participating creators through September 7, after which the new system takes over.

X wants to reward creators, not engagement farmers

Read more
Snapchat’s Spotlight algorithm now favors human-made videos over AI-generated ones
Snapchat is taking a firm stance against AI slop.
Snapchat-App-Store-open-on-iPhone

If you've been uploading fully AI-generated videos on Snapchat in hopes of earning rewards, it might be time to rethink your strategy. Snapchat has announced changes to Spotlight that prioritize authentic, original creativity over content created entirely by artificial intelligence. The company says its recommendation system will now favor videos made by real creators, while fully AI-generated submissions will no longer qualify for monetization.

So what's changing on Spotlight?

Read more
LinkedIn is crowdsourcing its fight against AI slop
The company is rolling out a new button that lets you flag posts that seem AI generated.
LinkedIn seems like AI slop button

LinkedIn has a serious AI slop problem, and it's now turning to its own users to help fix it. The platform is rolling out a new button that lets users flag posts they suspect were generated by AI. It plans to use that feedback to fine-tune the system that decides how much reach a post gets outside a user's own network, based on how AI-generated it appears.

The announcement comes shortly after an analysis by Pangram found that more than forty percent of long-form LinkedIn posts are fully AI-generated, and it suggests that the reach-trimming measures the company rolled out earlier this year haven't been enough on their own.

Read more