Skip to main content
  1. Home
  2. Social Media
  3. News

Match Group sues Bumble for alleged patent infringement

Add as a preferred source on Google

Recode is reporting that Match Group, which owns Tinder, Match, and other online dating services, is suing one of its biggest competitors, Bumble, for alleged patent infringement. Bumble is an online dating service that requires women to initiate the conversations between users.

Bumble was created by one of Tinder’s co-founders, and Match Group is alleging that Bumble infringed one two of its patents. One of those was Tinder’s famous swipe-to-connect feature. The lawsuit also claims that two of Bumble’s early executives, Chris Gulczynski and Sarah Mick, stole “confidential information related to proposed Tinder features,” such as the ability to let users go back if they accidentally skipped over someone they were interested in. Both Mick and Gulczynski worked at Tinder prior to moving onto Bumble.

Recommended Videos

“Match Group has invested significant resources and creative expertise in the development of our industry-leading suite of products,” a Match Group spokesperson told Recode. “We are committed to protecting the intellectual property and proprietary data that defines our business. Accordingly, we are prepared when necessary to enforce our patents and other intellectual property rights against any operator in the dating space who infringes upon those rights.”

Patent lawsuits are a way of life in the tech world, but Bumble and Match Group have some history together. Most notably, Tech Crunch reported that Match Group tried to buy Bumble for $450 million. There is some speculation that this lawsuit might be a means of pressuring Bumble back to the negotiation table. After all, if Bumble is part of Match Group, then it can hardly be accused of infringing on Match Group’s copyrights or patents.

Issues of lawsuits aside, Match Group’s properties have borrowed from Bumble in the past. For example, we recently reported that Tinder was in the process of developing a feature that requires women to make the first move, just like on Bumble. That being said, Tinder’s implementation of this feature is a bit different than Bumbles as it is not a mandatory part of the app. Women will be able to opt into the feature, but they won’t be required to make the first move if they do not want to.

Eric Brackett
Former Digital Trends Contributor
X’s creator payouts are changing, and original content is the new currency
The platform is replacing Revenue Sharing with a program designed to reward creators who actually make something.
X Twitter on iPhone

X is changing the rules for creators yet again. This time, the platform wants to put less emphasis on simply generating engagement and more on actually making something original. X is replacing its controversial Creator Revenue Sharing program with a new initiative called Original Content Rewards, which will officially launch on September 8, 2026. The existing Revenue Sharing program will continue paying participating creators through September 7, after which the new system takes over.

X wants to reward creators, not engagement farmers

Read more
Snapchat’s Spotlight algorithm now favors human-made videos over AI-generated ones
Snapchat is taking a firm stance against AI slop.
Snapchat-App-Store-open-on-iPhone

If you've been uploading fully AI-generated videos on Snapchat in hopes of earning rewards, it might be time to rethink your strategy. Snapchat has announced changes to Spotlight that prioritize authentic, original creativity over content created entirely by artificial intelligence. The company says its recommendation system will now favor videos made by real creators, while fully AI-generated submissions will no longer qualify for monetization.

So what's changing on Spotlight?

Read more
LinkedIn is crowdsourcing its fight against AI slop
The company is rolling out a new button that lets you flag posts that seem AI generated.
LinkedIn seems like AI slop button

LinkedIn has a serious AI slop problem, and it's now turning to its own users to help fix it. The platform is rolling out a new button that lets users flag posts they suspect were generated by AI. It plans to use that feedback to fine-tune the system that decides how much reach a post gets outside a user's own network, based on how AI-generated it appears.

The announcement comes shortly after an analysis by Pangram found that more than forty percent of long-form LinkedIn posts are fully AI-generated, and it suggests that the reach-trimming measures the company rolled out earlier this year haven't been enough on their own.

Read more