Skip to main content
  1. Home
  2. Social Media
  3. Legacy Archives

No, Saudi Arabia’s King Abdullah did not offer to buy Facebook for $150 billion

Add as a preferred source on Google
king-abdullah-saudi-arabia-facebook
Image used with permission by copyright holder

This weekend, the Internet became flooded with reports that King Abdullah of Saudi Arabia had offered to buy Facebook for $150 billion cash in an attempt to thwart tech-savvy anti-government protesters in the oil-rich Middle Eastern country.

The story appeared in a countless number of media outlets, including publications in Egypt, and outlets like Iran’s Tehran Times.

Recommended Videos

Unfortunately for them (and possibly Facebook co-founder Mark Zuckerberg and the rest of the social networking giant’s investors), the story just isn’t true.

The rumor started after the website DawnWires.com published a story with the headline, “Saudi King to buy Facebook for $150 billion to end the revolt: Goldman Sachs to advise.” The satirical lead paragraph reads:

In what is being termed as pure Wall street Gordon Gecko tactics, King Abdullah of Saudi Arabia has decided to make an offer of $150 billion to buy out Facebook. Inside sources within the kingdom suggest that he is very upset with Mark Zukerberg for allowing the revolt to get out of control. In a personal meeting between Mark Zuckerberg and King Abdullah on Jan 25, 2011, Zuckerberg had promised that he would not allow any revolt pages to be formed on Facebook even while he allowed Egypt and Libya revolt pages to be formed. But little did King Abdullah know Zuckerberg. Had he seen the movie “Social Network”, he would have been better advised than to trust Zuckerberg.

Of course, a story like that would catch any editor’s eye: Facebook has played a significant role in the wave of protests that have swept through the Middle East and northern African nations. And $150 billion is a hard offer for anyone to refuse.

Problem is, anyone only need read the fine print beneath the headline, which shows that the story was filed in “LOL News.” In addition, the story’s footer clearly states that it was part of Dawn Wires’ “Sunday Humor” series. “Sunday Humor article at Dawnwires.com are meant to humor our readers,” says the website at the bottom of the article page. “They may or may not be the truth.”

This story, of course, goes in the “may not be the truth” category, as Facebook has only been valued at a mere $50 billion. Which is much more believable than the ludicrous $150 billion price tag. Right?

Andrew Couts
Features Editor for Digital Trends, Andrew Couts covers a wide swath of consumer technology topics, with particular focus on…
Topics
Meta just pulled its most controversial AI image generation feature days after launch
Meta is framing this as "hearing feedback," not as fixing a consent problem.
Instagram Muse Image

A couple of days ago, I covered Meta’s announcement of the Muse Image, an AI tool that lets users generate images based on someone’s Instagram profile without asking the account owner. 

I also highlighted the risks associated with it in another piece, along with steps for opting out. Three days later, the feature is no longer available. 

Read more
Your YouTube playlists can now become actual TV shows, but there’s a catch you need to know
YouTube just gave Partner Program creators the episodic infrastructure that Netflix has been using to keep audiences hooked for years.
Electronics, Mobile Phone, Phone

YouTube just gave its creators a tool that streaming platforms take for granted. I’m talking about the ability to structure content as proper episodic TV. 

If you're in the YouTube Partner Program and you’ve been organizing your videos into playlists while praying that the algorithm and your audience notice, then Shows is the upgrade you've been waiting for.

Read more
I knew there was plenty of AI slop on LinkedIn. Shocking report says the problem is far worse than suspected
LinkedIn app on App Store iPhone

I already knew LinkedIn was overflowing with posts written by AI, recycled leadership advice, and those god-awful lessons about entrepreneurship. A new report suggests the situation is considerably worse than even the platform’s feed makes it appear.

AI-detection company Pangram analyzed more than one million posts scanned through its Chrome extension across LinkedIn, X, Reddit, Medium, and Substack. LinkedIn represented approximately one-third of everything scanned, yet produced 62% of all content Pangram flagged as AI-generated.

Read more