Skip to main content

Negative user comments can sway readers’ reaction to news, read at your own risk

keepcalmWe wouldn’t be surprised if the now-ubiquitous advice, “Don’t read the comments,” was likely first uttered soon after online readers were given the ability to leave notes at the end of blog posts, news stories, or whatever online content that they were watching or reading on the Internet (those four words of conventional wisdom even has its own dedicated Twitter feed.) Now, however, there is empirical evidence suggesting that reading the comments can actually affect the way that you understand the original story.

Dominique Brossard and Dietram A. Scheufele, two professors of science communication at the University of Wisconsin, Madison, carried out a study in which 1,183 volunteers were asked to read one of two versions of a fictional online news story about a new technology called nanosilver – half of those surveyed were asked to read the story followed by civil comments, while the other half read the same story with more aggressively argumentative comments – and then answer a questionnaire about what they had just read.

Related Videos

“The results were both surprising and disturbing,” Brossard and Scheufele wrote in a New York Times op-ed piece about the experiment. “Uncivil comments not only polarized readers, but they often changed a participant’s interpretation of the news story itself.” The researchers called it “the nasty effect.”

According to Brossard and Scheufele’s findings, the “civil” group’s reaction to the fictional story remained unchanged from their initial take on the subject after reading the comments, but the same couldn’t be said of those who read the version with ruder comments. “Those exposed to rude comments, however, ended up with a much more polarized understanding of the risks connected with the technology,” the scientists explained. “Simply including an ad hominem attack in a reader comment was enough to make study participants think the downside of the reported technology was greater than they’d previously thought.”

While this may seem like a problem with an easy solution – simply ban offensive or outrageous comments that are likely to have such an effect on the reader – the execution of that solution is inevitably more difficult, especially considering that what does and doesn’t constitute offensive or rude commentary is subjective.

This is, of course, just one study that only roughly 1,200 volunteers participated in, and could therefore be argued against by anyone attempting to make the case for the value of a comments section. Nonetheless, those who argue against reading the comments will have even more reason to do so, especially if we see more studies of this nature carried out – presuming, of course, you’d rather your information sources tended to be fair and balanced.

Editors' Recommendations

Facebook tries to demystify your news feed with built-in transparency tool
facebook why am i seeing this post v1 copy

Facebook’s news feed is organized by complex algorithms, but now the social media giant will tell users why that specific post popped up in the feed. On Sunday, March 31, Facebook shared an upcoming tool, ‘Why Am I Seeing This,’ that’s designed to demystify the reasons certain posts appear in your feed over others. While the tool is based on the similar option, ‘Why Am I seeing This Ad?,’ Facebook says it’s the first time the company has built a news feed transparency tool directly into the app itself.

To use the upcoming tool, users can tap on the “...” menu and choose the “Why am I Seeing This?” option. The pop-up page that follows will list why the post appeared in your feed, as well as reasons why the post appeared before others. For example, Facebook may tell you that you’re seeing the post because you are friends with the user or part of a Group. Facebook will also list if you’re seeing the post because you’ve interacted with that user’s posts more than others, if you tend to react more often to a certain media type like photos or videos, or if the post is simply more popular than others.

Read more
Social media sites can predict your behavior even if you don’t use them
twitter q1 2018 report on mobile phone new

Bad news for people who are trying to preserve their privacy by staying off social media -- a new study has found that your privacy is at risk even if you are not personally using social media sites. The findings of researchers from the University of Vermont show that "privacy on social media is like second-hand smoke. It's controlled by the people around you."

Using data gathered from nearly 14,000 Twitter users, the team of scientists analyzed information about the content of people's tweets. They found that using information from the tweets of a few of someone's contacts -- just eight or nine friends -- made it possible to predict that person's tweets as accurately as using data from their own Twitter feed. This means that it's possible to predict your Twitter content from seeing your friends' tweets, even without having access to your Twitter.

Read more
Invite your friends — Facebook Events can now be shared to Stories

Facebook Events are coming to Stories. On Monday, January 14, Facebook launched a test for a new share button allowing users to share an Event inside Stories. Facebook says the feature allows users to share in order to find friends interested in joining them at the event. The feature is currently being tested in the U.S., Mexico, and Brazil.

On an event page, the share button now includes a “Share To Your Story” option for users who are part of the test. Shared events include a sticker that friends can tap on to find the event details. From the Story, friends can also respond Interested or Going, or click to view the event’s official page.

Read more