Skip to main content
  1. Home
  2. Social Media
  3. Legacy Archives

SEC regulations may not force Facebook to file IPO

Add as a preferred source on Google

zuckerberg-facebook ipoEver since Facebook’s remarkable round of fundraising and approximated $70 billion valuation earlier this year, IPO rumors have been swirling. And an SEC regulation that requires businesses with more than $10 million in assets and over 499 shareholders to go public seemed to set a 2012 Facebook IPO in stone. The rule didn’t mean that Facebook would have to publicly sell off its shares but that it would have to allow access to its currently confidential financial documents and corporate infrastructure. But now it seems like a for-sure Facebook IPO may be off the table as the SEC considers adjusting this regulation.

According to Fortune, an amendment may be drafted so that companies wouldn’t be forced into filing their S-1 form until they reach 1,000 shareholders. This means Facebook (and a handful of other companies, including the likes of Zynga) would have considerable more time to enjoy its private status before turning itself over to the public eye. To put off an IPO date even longer, the proposed bill wouldn’t consider employees shareholders (as it currently does). This would dramatically reduce the number of SEC-recognized shareholders and could effectively postpone public filings indefinitely, in theory. Taking things even further, accredited investors would also be exempt from the shareholder count–this means VC firms, mutual funds, and even people who are worth more than $1 million when they invest. Family and friends would still be included in that 1,000-limit count though.

Recommended Videos

The expanded shareholder limit and editing who is and isn’t considered a shareholder would make a significant difference when it comes to IPO filings, not to mention how companies choose to sell their shares. If a business plays its cards right, it could stay private forever – or at least be the one calling the shots and effectively taking a considerable amount of control away from the SEC.

Now the question is whether this will change Facebook’s IPO plans. It’s remarkably fast growth over the last year (despite those current whispers about losing users) has made it difficult for the company to stay private much longer, but that was according to the old rules. Facebook even admitted it “expects to start filing public financial reports no later than April 30, 2012.” But if these SEC regulations are amended, will it reconsider? Best case scenario, the bill wouldn’t be enacted for months yet, but it seems safe to say Facebook may have more options than we thought.

Molly McHugh
Former Social Media/Web Editor
Before coming to Digital Trends, Molly worked as a freelance writer, occasional photographer, and general technical lackey…
Instagram scammers are holding creators’ accounts hostage with copyright strikes
Meta’s copyright system is being weaponized against the creators it’s supposed to protect
A person holding a phone with the Instagram app open on it.

Imagine waking up to find your Instagram account suspended because someone claims you stole their content. You might know that the claim is false, but appealing it could take weeks. If you're a content creator, each day offline could cost you money. Meanwhile, the person behind the complaint offers to make the problem disappear for just a few hundred dollars.

According to a new BBC investigation, Instagram creators are being hit with this new online racket. Scammers are filing bogus copyright complaints and demanding payment to withdraw them, exploiting the fact that repeated claims can put an account at risk of suspension. The account owner may still have their password and login credentials, but that does little good when their content or account has been taken offline.

Read more
Social media users in Australia might get freedom from algorithms. I want it for us all.
Big Tech may soon have to give Australians more say over what lands in their feeds.
iPhone showing social media apps

Australians might soon get to hit the off switch on the algorithm running their social media feed. According to a BBC report, draft legislation set to land this week would force platforms to hand users that choice, and honestly, I believe every country deserves this option.

Why is the government pushing this now?

Read more
Instagram will limit reach for AI influencers who skip AI-generated label on their profile
Instagram tightens AI influencer disclosure rules with a clearer profile label
instagram-ai-generated-profiles

Instagram just drew a hard line around AI influencers pretending to be real people. The platform is renaming its old AI creator label to AI-generated profile, and this time it comes with penalties too. Accounts featuring a fully AI-generated person will see their reach cut if they skip the label, meaning your feed is about to get a lot more honest about who is actually behind the account.

So what counts as an AI-generated profile?

Read more