Skip to main content
  1. Home
  2. Social Media
  3. Entertainment
  4. News

Haters call for Star Wars boycott because new movie has too much diversity

Add as a preferred source on Google

Although last night’s highly anticipated release of the new Star Wars movie trailer set the Internet abuzz, the dark side of Twitter expressed neither excitement nor happiness. In fact, there is a social media movement currently underway requesting that fans boycott the movie through the hashtag #BoycottStarWarsVII.

According to comments attached to the hashtag, Star Wars: The Force Awakens is “promoting white genocide” because the movie’s lead actors aren’t white males. The movement to boycott the film began Sunday and has since expanded into a Twitter profile of the same name, with 156 followers (at time of posting).

Recommended Videos

The account attempts to explain its purpose through hate-filled comments and retweets, such as, “#BoycottStarWarsVII because JJAbrams said he hates white people and he promotes #WhiteGenocide.” Other complaints include accusations that through the portrayal of a diverse cast of characters, the movie attempts to push an agenda, presumably to force us into accepting that everyone deserves representation and not just Wookies and Ewoks.

The latest boycott isn’t the first time racists and bigots have expressed their unhappiness over an actor or actress’s representation as a Star Wars character. As The Nerds of Color mention, the current movement is an outgrowth of the #BlackStormtrooper hashtag that went around when John Boyega’s part as a stormtrooper was revealed. And, Hollywood Reporter reminds us of the backlash that occurred with Chuck Wendig’s inclusion of a gay Imperial officer in his novel, Star Wars: Aftermath.

Due to its overwhelming popularity and the movie’s history of dedicated fans, supporters have since derailed and taken over the hashtag to point out that this isn’t the first movie in the Star Wars series to include leads of color.

Fortunately for Star Wars fans, the movement will likely be one of Twitter’s least successful. So far, presales of tickets have crashed U.K. theater chain websites. And, as soon as tickets went on sale in the U.S., servers for online booking services and theater chains experienced the same effect.

Christina Majaski
Former Digital Trends Contributor
Christina has written for print and online publications since 2003. In her spare time, she wastes an exorbitant amount of…
X’s creator payouts are changing, and original content is the new currency
The platform is replacing Revenue Sharing with a program designed to reward creators who actually make something.
X Twitter on iPhone

X is changing the rules for creators yet again. This time, the platform wants to put less emphasis on simply generating engagement and more on actually making something original. X is replacing its controversial Creator Revenue Sharing program with a new initiative called Original Content Rewards, which will officially launch on September 8, 2026. The existing Revenue Sharing program will continue paying participating creators through September 7, after which the new system takes over.

X wants to reward creators, not engagement farmers

Read more
Snapchat’s Spotlight algorithm now favors human-made videos over AI-generated ones
Snapchat is taking a firm stance against AI slop.
Snapchat-App-Store-open-on-iPhone

If you've been uploading fully AI-generated videos on Snapchat in hopes of earning rewards, it might be time to rethink your strategy. Snapchat has announced changes to Spotlight that prioritize authentic, original creativity over content created entirely by artificial intelligence. The company says its recommendation system will now favor videos made by real creators, while fully AI-generated submissions will no longer qualify for monetization.

So what's changing on Spotlight?

Read more
LinkedIn is crowdsourcing its fight against AI slop
The company is rolling out a new button that lets you flag posts that seem AI generated.
LinkedIn seems like AI slop button

LinkedIn has a serious AI slop problem, and it's now turning to its own users to help fix it. The platform is rolling out a new button that lets users flag posts they suspect were generated by AI. It plans to use that feedback to fine-tune the system that decides how much reach a post gets outside a user's own network, based on how AI-generated it appears.

The announcement comes shortly after an analysis by Pangram found that more than forty percent of long-form LinkedIn posts are fully AI-generated, and it suggests that the reach-trimming measures the company rolled out earlier this year haven't been enough on their own.

Read more