Skip to main content
  1. Home
  2. Social Media
  3. Music
  4. Web
  5. Legacy Archives

Sub-Spotifying is the latest way to let technology passive aggressively flirt for you

Add as a preferred source on Google

We are a simple species: Anything we can turn into a wooing mechanism, we will. There’s Facebook flirting, Instagram courting, and now there’s sub-Spotifying.

You’ve probably sub-Spotified someone without even knowing it, or at least without knowing it had a name. This latest style of digital flirtation takes its name from “subtweeting,” which is where you direct a tweet at someone without tagging them via their @handle. Sub-Spotifying is similarly discreet, although subtweeting is usually used for negative purposes; this, on the other hand, is a way to say “hey I’m acknowledging your musical taste and reacting to it.” 

Recommended Videos

It’s part creeping, part crushing. Spotify is only the latest service to get this treatment, though. You don’t share your streaming history to Facebook unless you want someone to notice your great taste – and you certainly don’t give out your Netflix, Hulu, HBO Go, or Amazon Prime passwords unless you can bury those 18 episodes of Real World: New Orleans you binge-watched last Wednesday (to be replaced by Firefly, Games of Thrones, or House of Cards, of course). 

While you can flirt via Facebook posts, tweets, and Instagram photos, those are such forthright ways of gaining attention. You put effort into taking and posting that picture, or linking to that hilarious Onion headline. Sharing your streaming activity, however, is so much more nonchalant. You can scrupulously take notes and model your own activity after someone else’s and they would be never the wiser.

Who me? Oh, yeah I love The National. Yeah I was just listening to them like I always do, just casually being my awesome self. You noticed?

You’re also rewatching Lost? We have so much in common – I had no idea. 

Yes you did. You absolutely did. 

In essence, your over-noticing of them makes it look like they’re over-noticing you. And your plan is complete. 

But let’s dive into some details here, because sub-Spotifying has just emerged and we should all be a part of the process of defining the ways in which you can sub-Spotify.

Sub-Spotify method 1:

You see your crush is actively listening to music on Spotify. You know that he or she can also see that you’re actively listening to music on Spotify. You then decide to switch to a band he or she likes in the hopes they will either silently approve or – better yet – start a conversation with you about said approval.

Sub-Spotify method 2:

You see your crush is actively listening to music on Spotify. You know that he or she can also see that you’re actively listening to music on Spotify. You take note of what he or she is listening to, and start listening to the exact same artist (perhaps a different album so as not to seem like a stalker). You hope they notice and decide it is fate.

Sub-Spotify method 3:

You start taking mental notes on what kind of music your crush is listening to. You create a public playlist that jives with his or her taste. You share it to Facebook, or perhaps just have it on rotate so they will eventually notice, click, and approve (and again, hopefully start a conversation with you about it). You might not even like this music, but you will mute and press play until it has the desired effect.

Sub-Spotify method 4:

The previous methods of sub-Spotifying mostly exist within the Spotify client. However, so many users plug in, press play, and click out into something else that there’s a strong possibility your crush won’t notice your musical flirting. If you want to take matters into your own hands, you choose a band or song they like (or that you think makes some sort of message or hints at your liking of them) and share it out to Facebook or Twitter. The bold among us will include a cryptic message.

Someday, Spotify will enable “liking” and you will be able to thumbs up songs as they fly through the real-time listening stream in the right hand sidebar. Until that day, sub-Spotify on, lovers.

Molly McHugh
Former Social Media/Web Editor
Before coming to Digital Trends, Molly worked as a freelance writer, occasional photographer, and general technical lackey…
X’s creator payouts are changing, and original content is the new currency
The platform is replacing Revenue Sharing with a program designed to reward creators who actually make something.
X Twitter on iPhone

X is changing the rules for creators yet again. This time, the platform wants to put less emphasis on simply generating engagement and more on actually making something original. X is replacing its controversial Creator Revenue Sharing program with a new initiative called Original Content Rewards, which will officially launch on September 8, 2026. The existing Revenue Sharing program will continue paying participating creators through September 7, after which the new system takes over.

X wants to reward creators, not engagement farmers

Read more
Snapchat’s Spotlight algorithm now favors human-made videos over AI-generated ones
Snapchat is taking a firm stance against AI slop.
Snapchat-App-Store-open-on-iPhone

If you've been uploading fully AI-generated videos on Snapchat in hopes of earning rewards, it might be time to rethink your strategy. Snapchat has announced changes to Spotlight that prioritize authentic, original creativity over content created entirely by artificial intelligence. The company says its recommendation system will now favor videos made by real creators, while fully AI-generated submissions will no longer qualify for monetization.

So what's changing on Spotlight?

Read more
LinkedIn is crowdsourcing its fight against AI slop
The company is rolling out a new button that lets you flag posts that seem AI generated.
LinkedIn seems like AI slop button

LinkedIn has a serious AI slop problem, and it's now turning to its own users to help fix it. The platform is rolling out a new button that lets users flag posts they suspect were generated by AI. It plans to use that feedback to fine-tune the system that decides how much reach a post gets outside a user's own network, based on how AI-generated it appears.

The announcement comes shortly after an analysis by Pangram found that more than forty percent of long-form LinkedIn posts are fully AI-generated, and it suggests that the reach-trimming measures the company rolled out earlier this year haven't been enough on their own.

Read more