Skip to main content
  1. Home
  2. Social Media
  3. News

Twitter restricts law enforcement fusion centers from accessing bulk user data

Add as a preferred source on Google

Twitter is cutting off law enforcement surveillance hubs, known as “fusion centers,” from accessing a social media monitoring tool that allowed for the monitoring of its user data.

The move comes after the ACLU informed the company that Dataminr (a firm that creates Twitter surveillance tools that can visualize and track trends on the platform) was providing its services to the federally funded hubs.

Recommended Videos

As a result, Dataminr was forced to comply with Twitter’s existing policies prohibiting the use of its data for surveillance. However, it comes as a bit of a surprise that Twitter wasn’t aware of Dataminr’s activities, considering it partly owns the company.

Nonetheless, in a letter to the ACLU, it has now made it clear that Dataminr has terminated access for all fusion center accounts. Additionally, Twitter promises that Dataminr will no longer provide social media surveillance tools to any local, state, or federal government customer.

There are currently 77 fusion centers operating in states across the country. The domestic surveillance hubs participate in information-sharing and analysis as part of a local-state-federal partnership.

The Department of Homeland Security claims fusion centers play a “unique role” in preventing national threats through their data-gathering efforts at the local level. The DHS states the following on its website: “Fusion centers are the primary conduit between frontline personnel, state and local leadership, and the rest of the Homeland Security Enterprise, filling a significant security gap identified by the 9/11 Commission.”

Through a public records request, the ACLU discovered that a Los Angeles area fusion center (JRIC) had access to Dataminr’s Geospatial Analysis Application. The tool allowed the fusion center to search through billions of real-time and historical public tweets. In an email to the LAPD, Dataminr also allegedly highlighted how its products could be used to track protests by drawing from the Twitter “firehose” of public tweets.

In its letter to the ACLU, Twitter claims the only info Dataminr is now permitted to provide to law enforcement and first responders are its breaking news alerts based on public tweets.

“Datatminr’s product does not provide any government customers with their own direct firehose access or features to export data; the ability to search raw historical Tweet archives or to target or profile users; conduct geospatial analysis; or any form of surveillance,” said Dataminr in the letter.

Datamnir’s close relationship with United States law enforcement first came to light in April of this year, when a report by the Intercept claimed the company — along with other developers of social media surveillance tools — had received funds through the CIA’s venture capital firm, In-Q-Tel.

A few months later, in October, Twitter suspended one of those CIA-backed firms’ from accessing its commercial data after the ACLU claimed it was being used by the police to target protesters. In this case, the tool in question was Geofeedia — a social media mapping software that had allegedly been used by law enforcement in Oakland and Baltimore.

In November, Twitter reiterated its commitment to preventing its service being used by developers for surveillance purposes. Twitter allows devs worldwide to access public tweets in real time via its Gnip enterprise data products and its Twitter Public application programming interface (API). The company claimed that devs caught violating its polices could be suspended or have their access to its data products terminated.

Saqib Shah
Saqib Shah is a Twitter addict and film fan with an obsessive interest in pop culture trends. In his spare time he can be…
Instagram scammers are holding creators’ accounts hostage with copyright strikes
Meta’s copyright system is being weaponized against the creators it’s supposed to protect
A person holding a phone with the Instagram app open on it.

Imagine waking up to find your Instagram account suspended because someone claims you stole their content. You might know that the claim is false, but appealing it could take weeks. If you're a content creator, each day offline could cost you money. Meanwhile, the person behind the complaint offers to make the problem disappear for just a few hundred dollars.

According to a new BBC investigation, Instagram creators are being hit with this new online racket. Scammers are filing bogus copyright complaints and demanding payment to withdraw them, exploiting the fact that repeated claims can put an account at risk of suspension. The account owner may still have their password and login credentials, but that does little good when their content or account has been taken offline.

Read more
Social media users in Australia might get freedom from algorithms. I want it for us all.
Big Tech may soon have to give Australians more say over what lands in their feeds.
iPhone showing social media apps

Australians might soon get to hit the off switch on the algorithm running their social media feed. According to a BBC report, draft legislation set to land this week would force platforms to hand users that choice, and honestly, I believe every country deserves this option.

Why is the government pushing this now?

Read more
Instagram will limit reach for AI influencers who skip AI-generated label on their profile
Instagram tightens AI influencer disclosure rules with a clearer profile label
instagram-ai-generated-profiles

Instagram just drew a hard line around AI influencers pretending to be real people. The platform is renaming its old AI creator label to AI-generated profile, and this time it comes with penalties too. Accounts featuring a fully AI-generated person will see their reach cut if they skip the label, meaning your feed is about to get a lot more honest about who is actually behind the account.

So what counts as an AI-generated profile?

Read more