Skip to main content

Want a state job in Maryland? Hand over your Facebook password

facebook reviewAccording to the Washington Post, the Maryland Department of Public Safety and Correctional Services wants to include your Facebook account in its background check. Corrections officer Robert Collins was asked for his account login and password so the department could be sure he had nothing to hide, which Collins apprehensively offered up. And then he had to sit through every job applicant’s nightmare and watch his interviewer scroll through the contents of his Facebook account.

It’s a well known fact that potential employers skim your Facebook profile for any red flags – you know, any tagged photos or Wall posts showcasing exceptional debauchery. And if you aren’t smart enough to exercise your account’s privacy options or detag any alcohol-drenched images of yourself, then you deserve the job rejection. But when your interviewer actually asks for your login? Some boundaries are being overstepped.

Earlier this year, Dawnmarie Souza was fired from her job after posting complaints about her boss to Facebook outside of the office. Souza and the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) sued her former employer, and recently settled out of court for an undisclosed amount. The NLRB determined last year that Souza’s termination for her Facebook activity violated her First Amendment Rights.

So you can only imagine how quickly the Maryland state agency is backpeddling on this one. Collins, who was already employed by the department and simply seeking recertification, contacted the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) immediately after the incident. The ACLU has taken up Collins plight and after three weeks has yet to receive a response as to whether or not the policy will be permanently terminated. For the moment, the state’s Department of Public Safety has suspended the procedure for 45 days for internal review. The department claims it has always asked for login information on a voluntary basis, although Collins maintains “I understood the investigator to be saying that I had…to hand over my Facebook login and password.” Apparently the practice began last year as a means to screen for gang affiliation.

Editors' Recommendations

Topics
Molly McHugh
Former Digital Trends Contributor
Before coming to Digital Trends, Molly worked as a freelance writer, occasional photographer, and general technical lackey…
If Facebook wants to stick around, it needs to disappear for a bit
Facebook's Mark Zuckerberg | The future is private

Aside from making billions of dollars, Facebook has had a nightmarish past few years. Since the Cambridge Analytica debacle that came to light in 2018, the company has made headlines for all the wrong reasons seemingly every week.

From data breaches to antitrust charges, Facebook has been mired in a deep malaise of privacy missteps and a string of controversies. Its public reputation has taken a dramatic beating and is at an all-time low. In the last two years, the social network has lost 15 million users in the United States. The company even paid a $5 billion settlement to the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) over "privacy missteps."

Read more
Facebook has suspended ‘tens of thousands’ of apps over private data use
Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg in Washington, D.C.

Facebook says it has suspended “tens of thousands” of apps suspected of misusing private user data amid an investigation that it began last year following the Cambridge Analytica scandal.
The social media giant promised in March 2018 to take a look at all of the apps on Facebook that had access to large amounts of user information prior to when it changed its policy in 2014. The resulting suspensions were announced in a blog post on Friday. The investigation began after right-wing political analytics firm Cambridge Analytica improperly mined data from 87 million Facebook users. 
"Our App Developer Investigation is by no means finished. But there is meaningful progress to report so far," Ime Archibong, Facebook's vice president of product partnerships, wrote in the blog post. "To date, this investigation has addressed millions of apps. Of those, tens of thousands have been suspended for a variety of reasons while we continue to investigate."
Facebook said that it initially selected apps for investigation based on their user numbers, as well as how much data they could access from user accounts. It has since broadened that investigation to include apps that it thinks have the potential to abuse its policies, a process that involves both a background investigation of the developer, as well as an analysis of the app’s activity on the platform.
The investigation, Archibong wrote, involved “hundreds of people: Attorneys, external investigators, data scientists, engineers, policy specialists, platform partners, and other teams across the company.” 
While Facebook says that it removed tens of thousands of apps, it notes that the suspended apps, while plentiful, were only created by roughly 400 developers. An app being suspended doesn’t mean that it was necessarily posing a threat to people, and many were still in their testing phase when they were suspended, so they were never readily available to Facebook’s wider user base.
Facebook says it is not unusual for developers to have multiple test apps that never get rolled out. In some cases, apps were suspended because the developer did not respond to a request for information from Facebook, not due to any actual policy violations. One app, myPersonality, apparently shared information with researchers and companies but refused to take part in Facebook's audit -- so it was banned
The post goes on to says that Facebook hasn’t confirmed any other instances of misuse to date other than those it has already revealed to the public and that it has taken legal action against a handful of apps for a number of different reasons.
Beyond the investigation, Facebook says it has “made widespread improvements to how we evaluate and set policies for all developers that build on our platforms.” It also removed a number of APIs and has increased the number of people that work on its investigations team in order to better handle them in the future.

Read more
Does Facebook have a monopoly over your data? Network faces antitrust scrutiny
facebook antitrust investigation attorney general september 2019 acer device digital marketing 6168

Does Facebook’s dominance put users at risk? A new bipartisan coalition consisting of the attorneys general from eight states and the District of Colombia is now investigating the social media giant for antitrust violations, alleging Facebook “stifled competition” in a way that may have impacted user data and ad prices. New York Attorney General Letitia James confirmed the investigation on Friday, September 6.

“Even the largest social media platform in the world must follow the law and respect consumers,” James said in a statement. “I am proud to be leading a bipartisan coalition of attorneys general in investigating whether Facebook has stifled competition and put users at risk. We will use every investigative tool at our disposal to determine whether Facebook’s actions may have endangered consumer data, reduced the quality of consumers’ choices, or increased the price of advertising.”

Read more