Skip to main content
  1. Home
  2. Social Media
  3. Legacy Archives

Warning: Facebook Lists aren’t as private as you think

Add as a preferred source on Google

facebook friend listsFacebook recently unveiled a revamp on its Lists feature. Taking a page out of Google+’s book, the site has turned a little more focus toward curator user privacy and encouraging its users to have a hand in doing that by helping the site fill its Smart Lists as well as creating their own.

The update has made Lists far easier to use, and also revealed a few changes to how the site’s News Feed works. Like the Google+ Circles, you now have dedicated streams for each of your Lists–Close Friends, Acquaintances, Family, Work, etc. We did note when originally covering this launch that users would know they were part of a list. As Facebook put it:

Recommended Videos

“If you choose to share with one of your default lists (Close Friends, Acquaintances, Restricted) or a custom list, the people on that list will be able to see the other people included on that list; however, they won’t be able to see the name of that list. If you choose to share with one of your smart lists, the people on that list will be able to see the name of the list.”

We immediately thought this was a little strange: Why do people need to know what list they are on–or that they are on one at all? With Circles, you’re notified that someone has started following you, meaning they’ve added you to a Circle, but that’s basically the equivalent of friending you. So we were obviously a little mystified but couldn’t quite put our finger on what the embarrassing fallout from this could be.

Until now. Listen up, List users–unless you want to publicly out how you think of all your Facebook friends. If you don’t use lists exactly as they are intended and labeled, you might be sending some very embarrassing notifications around. For instance, if you decide to add your significant other and their family to your Family list, be aware they are going to be notified you think of them as such. Which has its own weird drawbacks. 

Also, seeing as people can see everyone else on your default and custom lists when you choose to share with them, it might not be very difficult to deduce what type of list they are on. You might want to take that into account when choosing to segment your friends. Why your personal Lists are anyone else’s information, we’re still uncertain.

FacebookWe’re also not huge fans of the dedicated News Feeds’ showing how many updates are coming from each. It’s turning out to be more work: We understand it’s to help you see the important things you’re missing via that ever-changing main stream, but some of us are pretty content skimming over it all.

And one more thing: If you are going to use these lists, we suggest immediately turning off the feature that sends you a notification every time one of your Close Friends does something on Facebook. Facebook explains how here

Molly McHugh
Former Social Media/Web Editor
Before coming to Digital Trends, Molly worked as a freelance writer, occasional photographer, and general technical lackey…
Child abuse material continues to surface on X despite Elon Musk’s promises
New investigation claims several previously flagged child abuse images were found on X.
X-logo

Elon Musk once called removing child sexual abuse material from X his top priority. Yet new investigations suggest the platform still struggles to keep known abusive content offline. Reviews by The New York Times and the Canadian Center for Child Protection found previously flagged material on X, while Grok generated sexualized images involving children earlier this year.

Grok generated images involving known abuse victims

Read more
Researchers warn that social media can reveal sensitive details about users
Social media activity can reveal your politics, religion, and shopping habits, researchers warn
Social Media

What you post online is only part of the story. A new review of research into social media privacy warns that platforms and third parties can potentially infer sensitive details about people from seemingly ordinary digital activity, including their political opinions, religious leanings and shopping habits.

The findings, as reported by Techxplore, published in the International Journal of Management Concepts and Philosophy, point to a widening gap between the amount of personal information generated online and the legal and ethical protections designed to safeguard it. The researchers examined privacy breaches, regulatory frameworks, and the responsibilities of both social media companies and their users.

Read more
Instagram scammers are holding creators’ accounts hostage with copyright strikes
Meta’s copyright system is being weaponized against the creators it’s supposed to protect
A person holding a phone with the Instagram app open on it.

Imagine waking up to find your Instagram account suspended because someone claims you stole their content. You might know that the claim is false, but appealing it could take weeks. If you're a content creator, each day offline could cost you money. Meanwhile, the person behind the complaint offers to make the problem disappear for just a few hundred dollars.

According to a new BBC investigation, Instagram creators are being hit with this new online racket. Scammers are filing bogus copyright complaints and demanding payment to withdraw them, exploiting the fact that repeated claims can put an account at risk of suspension. The account owner may still have their password and login credentials, but that does little good when their content or account has been taken offline.

Read more