Skip to main content
  1. Home
  2. Social Media
  3. News

Yet another global study says Instagram and Tiktok are bad for your mental health

Instagram and TikTok are back in the spotlight — for the wrong reasons.

Add as a preferred source on Google
TikTok
TikTok Unsplash

If you feel like you’ve heard this before, that’s because you probably have. A new global study tied to the World Happiness Report 2026 once again ties popular social media like Instagram and TikTok to poorer mental health outcomes, especially with younger people.

The report finds that these platforms, which are driven by algorithmic feeds and influencer content, tend to have a more negative impact on mental wellbeing compared to apps focused on communication like WhatsApp and Facebook. So not all social media is being treated equally anymore.

Why screen time isn’t the only problem now

In the report, one of the key takeaways is that how people use social media matters more than how much they use it. The study states that platforms centered around passive scrolling and curated content are more strongly associated with lower life satisfaction.

Recommended Videos

On the other hand, apps that are based on direct communication and social interactions show more positive or neutral effects on mental wellbeing. The report also notes that moderate usage (around an hour a day) is linked to better than excessive or no use at all.

Youth are the most vulnerable

The impact appears to be strongest among younger users. Data cited in the report shows that heavy social media use is linked to lower happiness levels. Adolescents who spent several hours a day on social media saw significantly lower life satisfaction. This effect is especially noticeable among teenage girls.

The World Happiness Report points to overwhelming evidence of harm at scale, with direct effects like cyberbullying and indirect effects such as anxiety. As more global studies reach similar conclusions, it has become increasingly clear that these algorithm-driven platforms are responsible for declining mental health.

Countries like Australia have already started restricting access to these platforms, and it appears that even app stores and search engines aren’t safe.

Vikhyaat Vivek
Vikhyaat Vivek is a tech journalist and reviewer with seven years of experience covering consumer hardware, with a focus on…
X’s creator payouts are changing, and original content is the new currency
The platform is replacing Revenue Sharing with a program designed to reward creators who actually make something.
X Twitter on iPhone

X is changing the rules for creators yet again. This time, the platform wants to put less emphasis on simply generating engagement and more on actually making something original. X is replacing its controversial Creator Revenue Sharing program with a new initiative called Original Content Rewards, which will officially launch on September 8, 2026. The existing Revenue Sharing program will continue paying participating creators through September 7, after which the new system takes over.

X wants to reward creators, not engagement farmers

Read more
Snapchat’s Spotlight algorithm now favors human-made videos over AI-generated ones
Snapchat is taking a firm stance against AI slop.
Snapchat-App-Store-open-on-iPhone

If you've been uploading fully AI-generated videos on Snapchat in hopes of earning rewards, it might be time to rethink your strategy. Snapchat has announced changes to Spotlight that prioritize authentic, original creativity over content created entirely by artificial intelligence. The company says its recommendation system will now favor videos made by real creators, while fully AI-generated submissions will no longer qualify for monetization.

So what's changing on Spotlight?

Read more
LinkedIn is crowdsourcing its fight against AI slop
The company is rolling out a new button that lets you flag posts that seem AI generated.
LinkedIn seems like AI slop button

LinkedIn has a serious AI slop problem, and it's now turning to its own users to help fix it. The platform is rolling out a new button that lets users flag posts they suspect were generated by AI. It plans to use that feedback to fine-tune the system that decides how much reach a post gets outside a user's own network, based on how AI-generated it appears.

The announcement comes shortly after an analysis by Pangram found that more than forty percent of long-form LinkedIn posts are fully AI-generated, and it suggests that the reach-trimming measures the company rolled out earlier this year haven't been enough on their own.

Read more