Skip to main content
  1. Home
  2. Social Media
  3. News

Yet another study finds too many kids are seeing harmful content on social media

Despite the UK's Online Safety Act coming into force last year, a new study found that harmful content is still reaching a third of teenagers and nearly half of all girls on social media every week.

Add as a preferred source on Google
a boy using iPhone
Ivan Prokhorov / Unsplash

A year after the UK’s Online Safety Act came into force, a new study has found that harmful social media content is still reaching teenagers at nearly the same rate as before the law took effect. Research by the Molly Rose Foundation (via The Guardian) found that a third of all UK teenagers and nearly half of all girls encountered suicide, self-harm, depression, or eating disorder content on social media in the span of just one week.

What the data shows

The study surveyed 1,825 children aged 13 to 17 across 21 UK schools in April and May 2026. Here’s what it found:

  • Over a third of children (34%) were exposed to high-risk content in the past week. The figure was 37% before the Online Safety Act came into force in July 2025. The researchers say this change is not statistically significant.
  • Girls were disproportionately affected, with nearly half (47%) encountering harmful content in the past week, compared to 23% of boys.
  • The numbers were worse for vulnerable groups. Exposure reached 57% among children with low wellbeing and 40% among those with special education needs and disabilities.
  • Three-quarters of children who saw harmful content saw it on TikTok, more than three times the rate of the next most common platform, Instagram, at 23%.
  • Algorithmic recommendation feeds drove between 59% and 62% of all harmful content exposure.
  • Among children who saw content encouraging or promoting suicide, one in five encountered it 10 or more times on at least one platform within a single week.

What the law was supposed to do

The Online Safety Act’s Protection of Children Codes legally require platforms to prevent children from encountering content that promotes suicide, self-harm, or eating disorders. Violations can result in fines of up to £18 million or 10% of a company’s global revenue.

Despite those requirements, the foundation says exposure has barely moved. It attributes the failure largely to weak enforcement by Ofcom and calls for stricter controls on algorithmic recommendation systems.

Recommended Videos

Ian Russell, father of Molly Russell, who died by suicide in 2017 at age 14 after viewing harmful content online, said the findings were “shocking but sadly unsurprising.” UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer is expected to announce next week whether the government will pursue a social media ban for children under 16. The foundation’s own research, however, suggests that a blanket ban is unlikely to work without also targeting the recommendation algorithms that keep pushing harmful content in front of young users.

Pranob Mehrotra
Pranob is a seasoned tech journalist with over eight years of experience covering consumer technology. His work has been…
Meta used AI to make your Instagram feed harder to quit
Meta says its latest AI recommendation sytems are keeping people on Instagram longer by serving up more relevant Reels and Feed posts.
Instagram open on iPhone

Caught yourself scrolling on Instagram a lot longer lately? You're not imagining it. Meta just told investors what's driving that trend, and AI is at the center of it.

During its second-quarter earnings call, Meta said time spent on Instagram grew by double digits year over year after rolling out new AI-powered recommendation systems. According to the company, the biggest gains came from improvements to how it recommends Reels and other public content, making it easier to surface videos people are more likely to watch.

Read more
Meta’s latest courtroom losses expose a potential hole in social media’s strongest defense
Plaintiffs are treating engagement features as deliberately designed products, an argument that could make Section 230 far less useful
facebook

Two jury losses have given plaintiffs momentum against Meta, but they haven’t rewritten the rules for social media. One case relied on New Mexico consumer-protection laws. The other asked a California jury whether addictive design contributed to a young woman’s mental-health issues.

The verdicts, detailed by The Wall Street Journal, reached Meta through different legal routes. Together, they suggest Section 230 becomes a less dependable shield when a lawsuit centers on choices made by the platform itself.

Read more
Meta AI is moving into your Threads DMs, where awkward AI chats belong
Because not every AI conversation deserves a spot on your followers' timeline.
Meta AI in threads DM

One of the reasons Grok AI became so popular is because it let people chat with it directly on X, resulting in some hilarious conversations. And while the public availability of Grok AI on X has resulted in numerous safety issues, there's no denying that this openness played a major role in its rise. 

It seems Meta wanted the same, which became evident when the company started testing Meta AI directly on Threads a few months ago, letting users chat with it right in their feed. But not everyone was comfortable having those conversations out in the open, so Meta has just moved its Meta AI inside your Threads’ DMs. 

Read more