Skip to main content
  1. Home
  2. Social Media
  3. News

You can’t block Meta’s AI bot on Threads. I don’t know what we did to deserve this.

Meta's new Threads AI chatbot cannot be blocked, and users are furious about losing basic control over their own feeds.

Add as a preferred source on Google
A verified account on Instagram Threads.
Joe Maring / Digital Trends

Meta rolled out its AI chatbot on Threads this week, and it comes with a catch you didn’t agree to.

The new @meta.ai account, reported by Engadget, works a lot like Grok on X. You can tag it in a conversation, and it jumps in with answers about trending topics, live sports, entertainment, or breaking news.

Recommended Videos

The bot is currently in early beta access, limited to users in Malaysia, Saudi Arabia, Mexico, Argentina, and Singapore. Its public-facing account @meta.ai is visible to everyone on the platform, but here’s the problem: you cannot block it.

Why are Threads users frustrated with Meta AI?

People are angry because the three-dot menu next to @meta.ai’s profile does not have a block option, unlike every other account on the platform.

Some users tried to report it as spam, which usually triggers a block prompt, only to find the option either missing or broken. “Users cannot block Meta AI” became one of the top trending topics on Threads, with over a million posts demanding answers.

What is Meta’s official response to the backlash?

Meta spokesperson Christine Pai told TheVerge that users can mute the bot, hide its replies, or tap “Not interested.”

However, those options are not the same as blocking, though. They can reduce how much you see the bot after the fact, but they do not stop it from appearing in your conversations entirely.

The backlash is part of a bigger conversation happening across social media right now. Companies are pushing AI into every corner of your feed, and users are pushing back.

Meta has already been rolling out AI features across Facebook, Instagram, and Threads is just the latest addition to that list.

For Meta, it is a strategy to keep users engaged on its platform and make Threads more competitive against X. The problem is that most people want AI to be something they can choose, not something they are stuck with.

Meta says it will keep collecting feedback during the beta before expanding further. Whether that feedback actually changes anything remains to be seen.

Manisha Priyadarshini
Manisha Priyadarshini is a tech and entertainment writer with over nine years of editorial experience.
Meta just pulled its most controversial AI image generation feature days after launch
Meta is framing this as "hearing feedback," not as fixing a consent problem.
Instagram Muse Image

A couple of days ago, I covered Meta’s announcement of the Muse Image, an AI tool that lets users generate images based on someone’s Instagram profile without asking the account owner. 

I also highlighted the risks associated with it in another piece, along with steps for opting out. Three days later, the feature is no longer available. 

Read more
Your YouTube playlists can now become actual TV shows, but there’s a catch you need to know
YouTube just gave Partner Program creators the episodic infrastructure that Netflix has been using to keep audiences hooked for years.
Electronics, Mobile Phone, Phone

YouTube just gave its creators a tool that streaming platforms take for granted. I’m talking about the ability to structure content as proper episodic TV. 

If you're in the YouTube Partner Program and you’ve been organizing your videos into playlists while praying that the algorithm and your audience notice, then Shows is the upgrade you've been waiting for.

Read more
I knew there was plenty of AI slop on LinkedIn. Shocking report says the problem is far worse than suspected
LinkedIn app on App Store iPhone

I already knew LinkedIn was overflowing with posts written by AI, recycled leadership advice, and those god-awful lessons about entrepreneurship. A new report suggests the situation is considerably worse than even the platform’s feed makes it appear.

AI-detection company Pangram analyzed more than one million posts scanned through its Chrome extension across LinkedIn, X, Reddit, Medium, and Substack. LinkedIn represented approximately one-third of everything scanned, yet produced 62% of all content Pangram flagged as AI-generated.

Read more