Skip to main content
  1. Home
  2. Space
  3. Emerging Tech
  4. News

NASA’s new 3D printed rocket parts work just as well as the old-fashioned ones

Add as a preferred source on Google

Over the last several years, the rise of 3D printing and 3D-printed goods has paved the way for technological advancements in nearly every industry. If you had told someone just five years ago people in 2015 would’ve successfully 3D-printed a house, a batch of human tissue, or even an FDA-approved drug, they’d have likely called you crazy. Thing is, those projects aren’t even in the same ballpark of crazy compared to what NASA’s currently cooking up at its Marshall Space Flight Center in Huntsville, Alabama.

Since 2013, the massive space agency has taken to the task of not only 3D-printing working rocket parts, but have also run the parts through extremely rigorous heat tests to see how they stand up to traditionally manufactured parts. Guess what? The rocket parts passed NASA’s hot-fire tests and passed with flying colors. Literally. During each of the eleven main stage hot-fire tests, NASA burned liquid oxygen and gaseous hydrogen through the 3D-printed parts which burned at temperatures close to 6,000 degrees Fahrenheit, while producing a mesmerizing green flame.

Recommended Videos

NASA propulsion engineer Sandra Elam Green oversaw each of the tests and also inspected the parts thereafter, reporting “no difference in performance” between a 3D-printed rocket part and one manufactured the —dare we say it— old-fashioned way. During the post-test inspections, it was also shown that the 3D-printed injectors remained in “excellent condition” allowing the engineers the opportunity to instantly continue running harsh tests on the parts.

“We saw no difference in performance of the 3D-printed injectors compared to the traditionally manufactured injectors,” Greene says. “Two separate 3D-printed injectors operated beautifully during all hot-fire tests.”

What’s particularly intriguing about 3D-printed rocket injectors — other than the fact they’re, you know, 3D-printed — is how much time and money the 3D-printing process saves compared to the traditional method. Instead of a six-month, $10k fabrication process for traditional injectors, the 3D-printed parts cost roughly $5k to make and were ready for testing in just three weeks. Whereas the traditional part is comprised of four separate parts requiring five different welds, a state-of-the-art 3D printer produced the same injectors as just one piece, which needed minimal machining afterward.

Propulsion engineer Sandra Greene (left) and test engineer Cynthia Sprader
Propulsion engineer Sandra Greene (left) and test engineer Cynthia Sprader NASA

Obviously these developments point to incredible benefits for NASA’s projects here on Earth, but the space agency also has its sights set on utilizing 3D printing on the International Space Station. In a partnership with the engineering and manufacturing company Made in Space, NASA outfitted the ISS with a Zero-G Printer capable of allowing those onboard to simply download and print a wide range of necessary tools and objects. The partnership has already proven a success as a team aboard the ISS printed a working ratchet with the Zero-G Printer just last December.

As NASA continues to perfect and test its use of additive manufacturing, there’s no denying the potential it has. Marshall Center’s Engineering Directorate Chris Singer even acknowledges it allows the agency to explore new mission possibilities by giving it the chance to print rocket parts, or even an “entire spacecraft.” So yeah, if you told someone five years ago about just half of these technological developments they’d definitely think you were stark-raving mad.

Rick Stella
Former Associate Editor, Outdoor
Rick became enamored with technology the moment his parents got him an original NES for Christmas in 1991. And as they say…
SpaceX Starship reaches orbit for the first time but its historic flight ends early
Starship reaches orbit for the first time and deploys 26 Starlink satellites before an early splashdown.
spacex-starship

After 13 suborbital test flights and more than $15 billion in development costs, SpaceX's Starship has finally reached orbit. The 407-foot megarocket, the most powerful ever built, lifted off from Starbase, Texas, on Monday and delivered its first real payload on it's 14th attempt. The celebration came with an asterisk, though, since SpaceX had to cut the planned 10-hour mission to roughly three hours.

https://twitter.com/SpaceX/status/2104601695711904180

Read more
Starship is finally going orbital, and SpaceX has picked September 22
Flight 14 is aiming for orbit, Starlink V3 deployment and a very long day in space.
Starship rocket.

SpaceX is finally ready to give Starship its biggest test yet. The company says the massive rocket's 14th test flight is scheduled for September 22, when it will attempt to put the upper stage into Earth orbit for the first time. The launch is currently pending regulatory approval, with a 75-minute window opening at 7:15 a.m. CT.

Starship has 26 Starlink satellites to deliver

Read more
Want a city on the Moon? Scientists say there’s not enough water
A billion tons still comes up short
Artist impression of activities in a Moon Base.

For decades, humanity has looked up at the Moon and wondered what it would be like to live on it. Think sprawling cities, factories, research centers, and permanent human settlements. Unfortunately, there is one fairly fundamental problem with that vision.

A new study published in Frontiers in Space Technologies argues that even the Moon's potentially enormous reserves of frozen water may be nowhere near enough to support city-sized populations sustainably. Researchers Martin Elvis and Jonathan McDowell estimate that the permanently shadowed regions near the lunar poles could contain roughly one billion tons of water. It sounds like an extraordinary amount until you put a million thirsty humans next to it.

Read more