Skip to main content

The Oculus Touch controller isn’t coming out until the second half of 2016

zenimax oculus 500 million palmer luckey touch
eVRydayVR
Oculus Touch, the motion-based controller designed to accompany the Oculus Rift headset, will not ship until “the second half of 2016,” the manufacturer announced Thursday. In a post on the Oculus blog, the company revealed the delay will allow the development team to continue refining many aspects of the Touch’s design and performance.

“On Touch hardware,” the blog post said, “we’ve made significant advances in ergonomics, and we’re implementing many changes that make Touch even more comfortable, reliable, and natural. We’re also implementing changes that improve hand pose recognition.”

The company also said it has ordered a larger number number of Touch pre-release development kits, so it can “can get a lot more Touch hardware in the hands of developers who need it.”

The announcement follows multiple timed previews in recent months unveiling new games designed specifically for the Oculus Rift, including Rock Band VR, and The Climb, a rock-climbing simulator from Crysis developer Crytek. Though the Rift is a general-purpose virtual reality device, its core fanbase stems from the video game community, which embraced the Rift after Doom creator (and current Oculus CTO) John Carmack endorsed the device.

While that might make the delay seem like a crippling setback, it technically does not affect how users will interact with the Rift on day one. Palmer Luckey initially said the Touch would ship shortly after the release of the Rift in the second quarter of 2016 when he first unveiled the device in June 2015. Prior to the announcement, Oculus announced that the Rift will not only be compatible with Microsoft’s Xbox One controller, but would ship with one in the box.

Oculus assured the public that the Oculus Rift headset will still ship in “Q1” 2016 and that the company would begin pre-orders for the headset will begin “very soon.” Meanwhile, the HTC Vive headset is currently expected to ship in April 2016.

Mike Epstein
Former Digital Trends Contributor
Michael is a New York-based tech and culture reporter, and a graduate of Northwestwern University’s Medill School of…
4 CPUs you should buy instead of the Ryzen 7 7800X3D
AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D sitting on a motherboard.

The Ryzen 7 7800X3D is one of the best gaming processors you can buy, and it's easy to see why. It's easily the fastest gaming CPU on the market, it's reasonably priced, and it's available on a platform that AMD says it will support for several years. But it's not the right chip for everyone.

Although the Ryzen 7 7800X3D ticks all the right boxes, there are several alternatives available. Some are cheaper while still offering great performance, while others are more powerful in applications outside of gaming. The Ryzen 7 7800X3D is a great CPU, but if you want to do a little more shopping, these are the other processors you should consider.
AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D

Read more
Even the new mid-tier Snapdragon X Plus beats Apple’s M3
A photo of the Snapdragon X Plus CPU in the die

You might have already heard of the Snapdragon X Elite, the upcoming chips from Qualcomm that everyone's excited about. They're not out yet, but Qualcomm is already announcing another configuration to live alongside it: the Snapdragon X Plus.

The Snapdragon X Plus is pretty similar to the flagship Snapdragon X Elite in terms of everyday performance but, as a new chip tier, aims to bring AI capabilities to a wider portfolio of ARM-powered laptops. To be clear, though, this one is a step down from the flagship Snapdragon X Elite, in the same way that an Intel Core Ultra 7 is a step down from Core Ultra 9.

Read more
Gigabyte just confirmed AMD’s Ryzen 9000 CPUs
Pads on the AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D.

Gigabyte spoiled AMD's surprise a bit by confirming the company's next-gen CPUs. In a press release announcing a new BIOS for X670, B650, and A620 motherboards, Gigabyte not only confirmed that support has been added for next-gen AMD CPUs, but specifically referred to them as "AMD Ryzen 9000 series processors."

We've already seen MSI and Asus add support for next-gen AMD CPUs through BIOS updates, but neither of them called the CPUs Ryzen 9000. They didn't put out a dedicated press release for the updates, either. It should go without saying, but we don't often see a press release for new BIOS versions, suggesting Gigabyte wanted to make a splash with its support.

Read more