Skip to main content
  1. Home
  2. Wearables
  3. News

Meta accused of preparing facial recognition features for AI smart glasses

Meta’s wearable AI ambitions spark privacy concerns after facial recognition report

Add as a preferred source on Google
Meta Ray-Ban Gen 2 Smart Glasses
Meta Ray-Ban Gen 2 Smart Glasses Meta

Meta is facing renewed scrutiny after a report revealed that the company quietly embedded face-recognition technology into software linked to its smart glasses ecosystem, potentially laying the groundwork for a controversial surveillance feature years after publicly stepping back from facial recognition on Facebook.

According to a WIRED investigation, code updates to Meta’s AI companion app included an unreleased internal system called “NameTag,” designed to identify people captured by the cameras on Meta’s Ray-Ban and Oakley smart glasses. The report claims the software can convert faces into biometric signatures, compare them against stored databases on a user’s phone, and alert wearers when someone is recognised.

Meta’s smart glasses ambitions are colliding with old privacy fears

The discovery is significant because it suggests Meta has continued developing consumer-level face-recognition technology despite years of backlash, lawsuits, and regulatory scrutiny over how it handled biometric data on Facebook. The company shut down Facebook’s facial recognition system in 2021 and deleted more than a billion faceprints after mounting criticism from privacy advocates and regulators.

Recommended Videos

WIRED’s investigation claims core components of the NameTag system had already been integrated into software distributed to millions of phones as early as January 2026. The app itself has reportedly been downloaded more than 50 million times and acts as a key companion platform for Meta’s smart glasses ecosystem.

The report says Meta has already deployed three AI models related to the feature. One detects faces, another crops them from images, and a third converts them into biometric data. Security researchers cited in the report reportedly recreated portions of the system independently and found that the recognition pipeline appeared nearly functional.

That matters because wearable face recognition has long been viewed as a far more invasive form of surveillance than traditional smartphone-based tagging systems. Unlike social media uploads, smart glasses operate in real time and can potentially identify strangers in public spaces without their knowledge or consent.

Privacy groups, including the American Civil Liberties Union and the Electronic Privacy Information Center, have reportedly warned that such technology could normalize mass identification in everyday life, enabling misuse ranging from stalking to targeted surveillance.

Meta says nothing has launched yet, but concerns are already growing

Meta has pushed back against some of the claims, stating that the technology remains exploratory and that no consumer-facing facial-recognition feature has officially launched. The company also said it is not building a central facial recognition database and would take a “thoughtful approach” before releasing anything publicly.

Still, the timing of the report is important. Smart glasses are increasingly becoming one of the biggest battlegrounds in consumer AI, with companies racing to build wearable assistants that can see, hear, and interpret the world around users. Meta has aggressively expanded its AI wearables ambitions through partnerships with EssilorLuxottica, while rivals including Apple and Google continue exploring similar mixed-reality technologies.

For consumers, the issue goes beyond just another AI feature. If wearable face recognition becomes mainstream, it could fundamentally change expectations around anonymity in public spaces. Critics argue that once these systems become common enough, opting out may no longer feel realistic.

The next big question is whether Meta eventually activates NameTag publicly, modifies the technology under regulatory pressure, or keeps it limited to experimental testing. Either way, the report signals that face recognition inside wearable devices may no longer be a distant concept – it may already be sitting quietly inside apps millions of people have installed.

Moinak Pal
Moinak Pal is has been working in the technology sector covering both consumer centric tech and automotive technology for the…
Don’t expect smartwatches and fitness bands with replaceable batteries anytime soon
Turns out even the EU thinks your smartwatch is too small for a battery swap.
Wristwatch, Arm, Body Part

The EU has a habit of pushing tech companies to adopt meaningful changes in their product. It's the reason your iPhone finally has a USB-C port, and it's also why companies now have to offer spare parts and repair support for electronics for several years after launch. So naturally, many of us assumed wearables were next in line for mandatory swappable batteries. Turns out, the EU just went the other way.

So what did the EU announce?

Read more
Samsung wants its upcoming Galaxy Watch to be your AI health companion
Ahead of its July 22 Unpacked event, Samsung has teased AI-driven health tracking and upgraded internals for its upcoming smartwatches.
A person wearing the Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra showing the Ultra Analogue watch face.

Samsung's July 22 Galaxy Unpacked event won't be all about new foldables. The company has also started teasing its next-gen smartwatches, and its pitch leans heavily on AI. In a newsroom post published ahead of the event, Samsung promises "a whole new level of effortless wellness," describing the upcoming watches as an "AI-powered health companion."

From tracking to interpreting

Read more
You can paint this wearable on your skin like a tattoo to monitor your heart and brain activity
This tattoo makes you look cooler - and it could save your life too
Painted electrodes on skin

Wearable health trackers have become smaller, smarter and more capable over the years, but they've also remained surprisingly… boring. Whether it's a smartwatch, a chest strap or a sticky ECG patch, most health sensors still rely on bulky hardware that can peel off, irritate the skin or become less accurate once you start sweating. Additionally, there is a shift of technology from plastic wearables/trackers to clothes, which seemingly do the same thing as well. But that is not the story today.

Researchers at Penn State think they've found a far more elegant solution. Instead of sticking another sensor onto your skin, why not simply paint one?

Read more