Skip to main content
  1. Home
  2. Wearables
  3. Mobile
  4. Features

Can Motorola’s cheap folding phone beat the Galaxy Z Flip 6 in a camera test? I found out

Add as a preferred source on Google
A person holding the Motorola Razr 2024 and Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 6.
Motorola Razr 2024 (left) and Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 6 Andy Boxall / Digital Trends

You’ve seen the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 6. You have looked at it enviously but get put off by the price that’s even higher than it was last year. I know the feeling. But then you see the Motorola Razr 2024, another really good folding phone that could be yours for a lot less. While there are various specification differences, the cameras are closely matched on paper, which will likely come as a surprise given the price difference.

Should you choose the Razr 2024 over the Galaxy Z Flip 6 if you want to take good photos, or is it the other way around? I found out when I put the pair to the test.

Recommended Videos

The camera specs

The Motorola Razr 2024 and Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 6's cover screens.
Motorola Razr 2024 (left) and Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 6 Andy Boxall / Digital Trends

Samsung updated the Galaxy Z Flip 6’s cameras, and by doing so, it recently beat the Galaxy Z Flip 5 in a camera test, showing the positive improvements working in reality. The Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 processor works behind the scenes, controlling a 50-megapixel main camera with an f/1.8 aperture and optical image stabilization (OIS). It’s joined by a 12MP 120-degree field-of-view wide-angle camera.

There’s no telephoto camera on the Z Flip 6, and Samsung doesn’t even encourage you to use a digital zoom, as the camera app only offers shortcuts to the main and wide-angle cameras. However, there are fun features like Flex Mode, where the cover screen can be used as a viewfinder to take selfies with the rear camera. Plus, if you wear a Galaxy Watch, it can be used as a remote viewfinder, too.

The Motorola Razr 2024 also has a 50MP main camera with OIS and an f/1.7 aperture, along with a 13MP wide-angle camera with a 120-degree field-of-view. One of the biggest differences between the two phones is the processor, as the Razr 2024 uses a MediaTek Dimensity 7300X chip. You can also use the cover screen as a viewfinder, plus there’s a fun option to have a cartoon face show on it to encourage your kids to look at the screen for a photo. The photos below were taken over several days with the camera on auto and have been resized for friendlier online viewing.

Main camera

There are several major differences between the Z Flip 6 and the Razr 2024 cameras, and most can be seen in this first image. The Motorola phone has an overeager HDR mode, which I found kicked in most of the time, while Samsung’s camera treats scenes differently. Its photos have a deeper contrast and are smoother than the Razr’s photos, which have a blockiness to them when you crop the image down. It’s not unpleasant, but there is a marked processed look to the Razr’s photos. I left HDR on auto for both phones throughout the test. If I were to run it again, I may turn it off entirely on the Motorola phone.

In the second photo, the Razr 2024’s different exposure levels show up. While there’s plenty of detail on the petals and the focus is sharp (a trend we’re going to see again), the Z Flip 6’s depth of field is smoother, the colors more natural, and the overall scene subtler. Going back to the focus, the Razr 2024 has a noticeably wider focal area than the Z Flip 6, which concentrates on the center of the scene.

These focal differences are very evident in the next photo of the yellow Corvette. The Razr keeps the vast majority of the scene in focus, including the other car and the building’s roof in the background, while the Z Flip 6 focuses on the rear three-quarters of the car and the rear wheel. Even the Corvette script is blurred. I like the Razr’s focus, but the Z Flip 6’s photo has the same preferable smoothness and color accuracy seen in the first photo.

The Galaxy Z Flip 6 wins back a lot of points when faced with a general landscape scene. The camera’s natural colors and balance really highlight how aggressive the Razr 2024’s HDR effect is and how it can make a photo look unrealistic. Crop the image down, and there’s a lot more detail in the Z Flip 6’s background, too. It makes choosing a winner difficult, as the Razr 2024’s wider focus is my preference, but the Z Flip 6’s photos are more detailed, and I prefer the color treatment, too. I’d live with the Z Flip 6’s central focal bias in this case, but it’s close.

Winner: Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 6

Wide-angle camera

The two wide-angle cameras are also quite hard to judge. The Galaxy Z Flip 6 has a slightly wider angle, so it’s better at showing scale, but the photos from both have about the same level of detail. The Razr 2024’s photos can show slightly more edge enhancement than the Z Flip 6’s, which is sometimes better at judging colors at exposure. There are pros and cons to both here.

You can see examples of the Z Flip 6’s wider angle and the way it handles colors in the photo of the car’s engine bay above, and I do prefer it to the Razr 2024’s photo. However, in the photo of the church, the Razr creates a moodier, more atmospheric shot, and it better exposes detail in the path and stonework, too. Unfortunately, the spire shows where the Razr resorts to edge enhancement to get the shot.

In the wide-angle photo of the lake, the Razr again gets the moodier shot, and its settings give the water a natural tone in keeping with the overall scene. The Z Flip 6 goes in the opposite direction, deemphasizing the colors and using a different exposure. It captures the scene well and crucially avoids most of the noise seen in the sky and clouds in the Razr’s photo, which lets it down. It’s hard to split the two wide-angle cameras, with neither consistently impressive but both taking acceptable photos.

Winner: Draw

2x zoom

Neither phone has an optical telephoto zoom, but one camera does have a 2x shortcut in the app, encouraging you to use it. Unfortunately, it’s the phone that you definitely should not be using the 2x zoom mode on. I’m only going to show a single example of the 2x zoom shots here, as the story is the same across all of them I took, and it’s that the Z Flip 6 has a far superior 2x mode than the Razr 2024.

I don’t think the Razr’s HDR effect helps the final image, but it’s clear the Z Flip 6 packs so much more detail into its photo, and it is much sharper, too. Crop down, and the sheep is pixelated in the Razr’s photo but surprisingly sharp and in focus in the Z Flip 6’s. Samsung doesn’t push the 2x mode at all, but it’s highly usable.

Winner: Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 6

Portrait mode

I’ll spoil the conclusion of this particular section early, as it ends up in another draw. I’m saying it now because I want to show where the Razr 2024 really impressed against the Z Flip 6 — and also where it later went completely wrong. Across various Portrait mode shots, neither phone always got the shot right. The thistle is a great example, as I wasn’t expecting either to do very well, but the Razr 2024 did a fantastic job of capturing the prickly head and the leaves, while the Z Flip 6 fumbled around trying to separate the plant from the background.

Unfortunately, the Razr 2024 didn’t always get it right. The Z Flip 6’s depth of field in the car photo is just right, while the Razr 2024 makes the image too flat to appear natural — especially as the windshield is blurred out. The Z Flip 6’s photo is also more sharply focused. However, neither consistently beat the other, hence this category being a draw.

Winner: Draw

Night mode

The two phones have been very close together throughout the comparison, resulting in several rounds drawn due to poor photos on both sides. Night mode is a serious test of the processor and software, though, so let’s see how they do here. The first photo was taken in very-low-light conditions, and the photos need little explanation for you to see which is better. The Z Flip 6’s image is sharp and defined with only minimal noise, while the Razr 2024 keeps things “realistic” to the conditions, but it’s not a photo anyone would choose to take.

In the second photo, the Razr 2024 fails to isolate colors and smudges detail. Once again, the HDR effect activates, giving the scene an artificial look. The Z Flip 6’s photo is sharp and defined. It doesn’t always take terrible photos, though, as we can see in the next photo with the various plants in pots for sale.

The two cameras capture the colors similarly, but the Z Flip 6’s exposure helps it capture more detail and definition. The Razr 2024 captures the hanging sign exceptionally well compared to the Samsung phone, with all the words readable when cropped down. This couldn’t help it win here, though, as the Galaxy Z Flip 6 consistently took better low-light photos than the Razr 2024.

Winner: Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 6

There’s a clear winner

A person taking a photo with the Motorola Razr 2024.
Motorola Razr 2024 Andy Boxall / Digital Trends

The Motorola Razr 2024 is a cheaper phone to buy than the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 6, but it’s worth paying the extra if you want to take the best photos. The Samsung phone has beaten its rival in this comparison. It has won three categories, and the rest have been draws, ensuring it easily wins. They’re all the categories that really matter, too — main camera, 2x zoom, and Night mode.

However, while the Razr 2024 lost, it was never really outclassed except for the Night mode, and a lot of that comes down to the Z Flip 6’s more powerful processor. If you want to share main camera and wide-angle camera photos online, then Motorola’s aggressive HDR mode may be preferable. Do think about how you’re going to use the camera before making your final decision, as there’s a considerable amount of money to be saved if it’s better for your needs.

After previous years, when complaints against the Z Flip series’ cameras were rife, Samsung has made a considerable effort to get it right for the Z Flip 6. It already won a camera test against its predecessor and has now defeated one of its primary alternatives. Yes, you can save some money by choosing the Razr 2024, but you may regret it if you want to really get the most from the camera.

Andy Boxall
Andy has written about mobile technology for almost a decade. From 2G to 5G and smartphone to smartwatch, Andy knows tech.
Garmin’s new Fitbit Air rival has 80 workout modes and avoids the frustrating subscription trap
Garmin CIRQA entered the screenless fitness band fight with 10-day battery and no monthly fee
Garmin CIRQA featured image

The screenless fitness-band revival has gained another serious contender, and Garmin is arriving with a refreshing approach. The new Garmin CIRQA Smart Band just debuted for $199.99 and offers up to 10 days of battery life while also featuring continuous health monitoring and support for more than 80 activities. It has no display, leaving Garmin Connect to handle every chart, score, and workout summary. Garmin ensures that a subscription is not required to access its features.

Garmin packed its fitness ecosystem into a silent wristband

Read more
The Galaxy Watch Ultra 2 is finally ready to dive, and the Watch 9 40mm gets a bigger battery
Galaxy Watch Ultra 2 may finally close the diving gap with the Apple Watch Ultra 3
The Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra's case and screen.

Samsung’s upcoming smartwatches may have another couple of meaningful upgrades hiding up their sleeves. Newly leaked promotional images suggest the smaller Galaxy Watch 9 will receive a much larger battery than previously reported, while the Galaxy Watch Ultra 2 could finally be certified for recreational diving.

The images were shared by an X account using the @evleaks handle, although the prominent leaker Evan Blass has previously said the account does not belong to him. They appear to be official Samsung marketing materials and reveal a few details that were missing from earlier specification leaks.

Read more
Bose’s next QuietComfort headphones could steal the Ultra’s best features
Bose QuietComfort deal

For the last few years, Bose has been in a slightly awkward position. Its standard QuietComfort headphones have remained an easy recommendation, but they've also felt a little... forgotten. While the Ultra lineup grabbed the spotlight with new features and a refreshed design, the regular QuietComfort stayed the same. That may finally be about to change.

A new leak suggests Bose is preparing a QuietComfort (2nd Gen) model, and if it's accurate, this looks like Bose bringing its mainstream headphones much closer to its premium offering.

Read more