Skip to main content

Can you say ‘rubber stamp?’ FBI and NSA requests never denied by secret court

fbi nsa surveillance requests approved monitored device
The FBI and NSA haven't been denied surveillance requests in two years William Murphy/Flickr
You likely don’t know much about the U.S. Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court. Though it keeps a low profile, this is the court the Federal Bureau of Investigation and National Security Agency go to when they want permission to put someone under surveillance. And they don’t get turned down, according to Reuters, citing a Justice Department memo. In 2015 the court received and approved 1,457 requests from the FBI and NSA. There were a bit fewer requests in 2014, but all of those were approved as well.

The surveillance requests are for email or telephone intercepts. If granted, which is apparently always, they generally are carried out with the assistance of Internet telecommunications service providers.

The Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court was founded in 1978 to hear requests by law enforcement and intelligence agencies to conduct surveillance on foreign suspects present in the U.S. It stands to reason that if you’re spying on spies, it’s better not to ask for permission in open court and leave a public paper trail.

The secretive court was set up to scrutinize the requests in secret, in order to ensure compliance with applicable civil rights requirements. That all makes sense. That every single request is essentially approved, however, seems at least curious if not a bit off. The government response about its perfect record of approvals is that the FBI and NSA are very careful when applying for surveillance and that the court at times modifies the requests. In 2014, 19 requests were modified, in 2015, 80 were altered.

The Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court hears more than surveillance requests. The FBI can also file National Security Letters (NSLs), asking Internet and telecommunications providers for customer information on foreign residents and U.S. citizens. Some NSLs ask for subscriber names, addresses, and billing information only, while others also request browsing history. The majority of information requests also come with a gag order, prohibiting the companies from informing customers of the requests. No information was provided showing the number of NSLs that were approved or denied.

Editors' Recommendations

Bruce Brown
Digital Trends Contributing Editor Bruce Brown is a member of the Smart Homes and Commerce teams. Bruce uses smart devices…
You’ll never guess how the NSA managed to spy on the Internet for so long
AT&T Wireless

Verizon finally has a trump card it can reliably play against chief rival AT&T. No matter how bad things get, at least Verizon wasn't the one that helped the National Security Agency (NSA) spy on Internet traffic. According to a stunningly detailed new report originally released by the New York Times, new documents from the government agency reveal that AT&T has been in bed with the U.S. government since 2003, forming a "highly collaborative" relationship based on the telecommunication giant's "extreme willingness to help."

As per the latest revelations, AT&T allowed the NSA access to "billions of emails" and also "provided technical assistance" in a move that ultimately allowed the snooping agency to wiretap all the Internet activity that took place in the United Nations headquarters, conveniently an AT&T user (remind someone to cancel that subscription ASAP).

Read more
Oh, NSA, please say you’re not spying on Periscope and Meerkat
periscope producer live stream

The National Security Agency (NSA) doesn't have the most positive of reputations right now. Its controversial phone surveillance program was recently ruled illegal under federal law. The NSA surveils a lot of online and mobile communications, and it's unknown which programs and apps are targeted. For example, whether the surveillance program also spies on popular livestreaming apps like Periscope and Meerkat might be a question we won't get an answer to, reports the Daily Dot.

The outlet reached out to everyone's favorite U.S. government agency through a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request. The NSA chief FOIA public liaison officer Sharon C. Linkous responded that "the fact of the existence or non-existence of the materials you request is a currently and properly classified matter."

Read more
Quit listening: Snowden calls court ruling against NSA surveillance ‘encouraging’
usa freedom act passes in senate with 67 32 vote nsa computers heartbleed bug

A federal appeals court has brought a case against the National Security Agency's (NSA) phone surveillance program back from the dead. Back in 2013, U.S. District Judge William Pauley dismissed the ACLU lawsuit on the grounds the NSA program was a "counter-punch" from the U.S. government against terrorists. Now, the second U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in Manhattan has ruled that the NSA's collection of millions of Americans phone records is illegal under federal law, Reuters reports.

Updated on 05-08-2015 by Malarie Gokey: Added Edward Snowden's response to the ruling.
NSA whistleblower Edward Snowden calls the ruling 'encouraging'
Just one day after the appeals court ruled that the NSA's surveillance program is illegal under federal law, the very man who leaked the information to the press -- Edward Snowden -- applauded the ruling, during an interview at the Nordic Media Festival with Forbes' contributor Runa Sandvik.

Read more