Skip to main content

IRS rules that Bitcoin will be taxed as property, not currency


Officially announced by the Internal Revenue Service earlier today, the government agency has ruled that all virtual currencies, such as Bitcoin, should be treated as property rather than regular income. This ruling is particularly advantageous to Bitcoin investors since the virtual currency falls under the capital gains tax and only applies when Bitcoin is spent. One of the main advantages to the capital gains tax is that it tops out at 20 percent while the highest tax bracket on income earned is nearly 40 percent.

Regarding the spending rule, capital gains are specific to what’s spent rather than what’s earned. For instance, if you purchased $50 worth of Bitcoin, then used that same amount of Bitcoin to purchase $100 of merchandise on after the Bitcoin doubled in value, that constitutes $50 in capital gains. It’s basically identical to stocks when value rises over time and spending the gained value would be considered a taxable event by the IRS. However, people that primarily use Bitcoin as an investment tool will likely appreciate the use of capital gains tax over traditional income tax. 

Related Videos

Interestingly, anyone that’s still actively mining Bitcoin will be be forced to report mined currency as income, thus the virtual currency is subject to the payroll tax. Miners will basically have to keep track of when each allotment of Bitcoin was mined and the value of the currency at that time.

At this time, it’s somewhat unclear how the IRS plans to police and track Bitcoin collections. However, these rules offer a clear outlook to taxpayers for the future of all virtual currencies. The new rules are retroactive as well, thus the IRS is relying on Bitcoin users to amend previous returns. Bitcoin users that have already filed their taxes this year can still amend their returns as well. Any Bitcoin related income that ‘s not reported correctly may result in penalties on the taxpayer. 

Editors' Recommendations

Hacker plays ‘Doom’ on John McAfee’s ‘unhackable’ BitFi Bitcoin wallet
john mcafee prioritizing privacy mcafee16

A 15-year-old bedroom hacker has managed to get classic first-person shooter Doom running on the allegedly "unhackable" BitFi crypto-wallet touted by tech-evangelist and paid promoter John McAfee. Although the Bitcoins that the wallet gives access too still appear unaffected by the hack, it doesn't bode well for the device, which some have described as little more than a modified Android phone.

BitFi is a cryptocurrency device that is designed to provide a hardware portal to a cloud-connected wallet. Bitcoins and other altcoins aren't stored on the device itself, but it does facilitate transactions. Although it has drawn some interest from security professionals and crypto-enthusiasts, it garnered most of its attention through affiliation with tech personality, John McAfee, who claimed it was unhackable. He also placed a bounty on it, offering $250,000 to anyone who could hack the device and steal Bitcoin from the cloud-connected wallet.

Read more
Facebook changes its cryptocurrency rules by easing its ad blocking policy
lawsuit orlando shooting facebook twitter

Facebook changed its mind about banning cryptocurrency-related advertisements from the social network. Since Tuesday, June 26, the updated policy will allow advertisements that promote cryptocurrency and related content, but only from pre-approved advertisers. Advertisements that promote initial coin offerings and binary options are still banned from Facebook's pages. 
Facebook updated its advertisement policy in January to prohibit ads that promote "financial products and services" linked to "misleading or deceptive promotional practices." Three examples given were binary options, initial coin offerings, and cryptocurrency. For example, an advertisement couldn't promote purchasing Bitcoin using retirement funds, or purchasing ICO tokens at a discount. 
But cryptocurrency isn't a problem: The issue resides with the people associated with cryptocurrency. For instance, one of the biggest scams is to lure hopeful investors into purchasing "valuable" tokens to financially help launch a new cryptocurrency. But instead of launching the new platform, scam artists are disappearing with the cash. This is one of the reasons why Facebook originally cracked down on cryptocurrency-related advertisements. 
Yet given that Facebook generates revenue from advertisements, banning all cryptocurrency-related ads may not have been a great financial decision. Facebook product management director Rob Leathern says that the company spent the last several months refining its advertisement policy to that some ads can safely show up on the social network. 
To enable these ads, Facebook implemented an application submittal process that includes submitting licenses, trading information on a public stock exchange, and "other relevant public background" information regarding the business wanting to advertise. That said, not all cryptocurrency-related companies will pass Facebook's inspection. 
"We’ll listen to feedback, look at how well this policy works and continue to study this technology so that, if necessary, we can revise it over time," Leathern says. "It’s important that we continue to help prevent or remove misleading advertising for these products and services." 
Google began banning cryptocurrency-related advertisements from its AdWords platform in June, blocking ads related to "unregulated or speculative financial products.” Google lists cryptocurrency ads under its “emerging threats” banner given that digital currency isn't regulated and therefore investors have no guarantee of safe, honest trading. 
Microsoft will join Google's lead in late June or early July, banning cryptocurrency-related advertisements from Bing. The company sings a similar tune in its reasoning: Because cryptocurrency and related products aren't regulated, there is potential for "bad actors to participate in predatory behaviors." Microsoft already bans virtual currencies that are designed to facilitate illegal purposes, but now the company will ban all cryptocurrency ads. 
Outside of the search engines, the Twitter Ads platform began blocking advertisements in March that are related to cryptocurrency wallet services, initial coin offerings, and cryptocurrency exchanges that don't meet specific requirements. Reddit began blocking cryptocurrency-related ads in early 2016, including Google-cached ads. 
Unfortunately, at least with Facebook, there is a possibility that something will slip through the cracks. The social network encourages everyone to report content that violates its advertising policies. If you see a bad ad, simply click "report ad" in the upper right-hand corner of the offending advertisement. 

Read more
The Justice Department is now cracking down on cryptocurrency scams

The U.S. Department of Justice is now working with the U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission to launch a criminal investigation to determine if cryptocurrency traders are manipulating prices using illegal practices. The news arrives by way of four unnamed people close to the federal probe who state that the private investigation is now underway and in its early stages. 
According to the sources, federal prosecutors are determining if traders are using a tactic called spoofing, which is the act of flooding the market with fake orders to increase demand and drive prices upward, and then canceling those orders. Another tactic is wash trading where a cheater trades with himself/herself to artificially inflate market demand, driving up prices. 
The lure of cryptocurrency is that it's not tied to any bank or government. At the same time, digital coins are not regulated by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), thus traders are essentially on their own, unprotected against a Wild West-like market. There is no real guarantee that cryptocurrency exchanges are actively pursuing cheaters, and there are no means of recovering lost monies stemming from fake cryptocurrency startups. 
A good example of the current cryptocurrency woes is the initial coin offering (ICO). Companies promising to launch a new cryptocurrency platform will offer "valuable" tokens in exchange for early investments -- something akin to Kickstarter where projects enlist financial backers that receive a product in the end. In this case, cryptocurrency startups are disappearing with the cash instead of launching their digital coin platforms. 
By March, these ICO-related scams reached to the point that the SEC opened investigations to crack down on companies, lawyers, and advisory firms promoting these ICOs. The government agency believes all virtual currencies should be listed as securities -- a tradable financial asset that gains worth over time -- and registered with regulators. There are securities laws in place to protect investors against fraud. 
Despite the growing interest in cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin and Ethereum, the market is considered volatile. For instance, a single Bitcoin was worth $6,897 on November 6, 2017, skyrocketed to $17,549 just over a month later, then dropped back down to $7,964 at the beginning of February. Since then, the value of a Bitcoin has experienced rises and drops resembling mountain peaks. 
The current Bitcoin slump reportedly stems from nations such as Japan and the Philippines now regulating cryptocurrency. China is banning cryptocurrency exchanges altogether. Even more, Microsoft and Google are banning cryptocurrency-related advertisements from their ad networks due to the unregulated, volatile nature of digital currency and the related scams. 
Meanwhile, the U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) doesn't regulate the actual trading of digital coins (aka spot markets), but instead deals with futures, which are legal agreements to purchase or sell an item at a set price on a set date in the future. The agency also deals with options, which are contracts providing buyers the right to buy or sell an asset for a specific price on a specified date. 
Still, the CFTC is capable of imposing sanctions if it discovers fraud in spot markets. 

Read more