Skip to main content
  1. Home
  2. Computing
  3. Legacy Archives

Your favorite browser probably didn’t hold up at this week’s Pwn2Own hackathon

Add as a preferred source on Google

Whether you’re talking about Chrome, Firefox, Internet Explorer, or Safari, none of your favorite browsers escaped unscathed when some of the world’s best digital security consultants congregated at Pwn2Own, a hacking competition held during this week’s security-focused CanSecWest conference in Vancouver. The participants in the tournament found and demonstrated exploits in each browser during the event, while racking up cash prizes doled out for successful efforts.

According to PCWorld, this year’s big winner was French outfit Vupen, which zeroed in on vulnerabilities in several programs including a exploit that would allow an attacker to bypass Chrome’s security measures.  Vupen also hacked their way into Internet Explorer 11, Firefox, Adobe Flash and Adobe Reader, with Chaouki Bekrar, the group’s founder, earning close to $400,000.

Recommended Videos

Meanwhile, infamous hacker George Hotz, AKA Geohot, demoed his ability to pull off a remote code execution exploit in Firefox. Various teams also showed off remote code execution exploits, which would permit an attacker to take control of their victim’s computer using browsers like Safari and IE, as well as commonly used software like Adobe Flash Player and Adobe Reader. All told, software-makers awarded $850,000 in prize money to competitors over the two-day competition.

Not everybody does it just for the cash, though. A charity-focused hacking tournament dubbed Pwn4Fun pitted Google security consultants against members of Hewlett-Packard’s DVLabs Zero Day Initiative, or ZDI. Between the IE vulnerabilities found by ZDI and the Safari exploits the Google team used, the pair managed to raise $82,500 for the Canadian Red Cross.

Mike Epstein
Former Associate Editor, Gaming
Michael is a New York-based tech and culture reporter, and a graduate of Northwestwern University’s Medill School of…
ASUS Zenbook Duo UX8407AA review: Two screens finally earned their place in my bag
Two machines are definitely better than one, but on the same laptop? Asus nailed it, but you must be willing to pay for the convenience.
ASUS Zenbook Duo has two displays

See at Amazon

Two displays on a laptop once sounded like an elaborate solution waiting for the right problem. ASUS has spent the past few generations steadily proving otherwise. After using the latest Zenbook Duo (2026) UX8407AA for over two weeks, I started arranging my daily routine around that second display. 

Read more
How Claude helped my 65-year-old dad finally ditch his handwritten ledgers
AI has a lot to answer for, but this one small win is hard to argue with, at least for me.
Claude app on iPhone

My dad has owned a small business for as long as I can remember, and for just as long, he's kept his books the old-fashioned way. Every sale gets written down by hand so he can file his taxes later. The problem is that his accountant needs this data in Excel, and my dad, who didn’t grow up around computers, has never learned how to use it.

For years, his workaround was paying someone to manually type his handwritten entries into a spreadsheet. It worked, but it was adding additional cost to his business, which he wanted to avoid, but couldn't.

Read more
AI’s energy tax was already concerning. Research says AI agents are over hundred times worse
AI agents could consume 136 times more energy than today's AI, study finds
AI agents

The AI industry's soaring electricity demand has already become a growing concern for governments, utilities, and technology companies. But a new study suggests the next generation of artificial intelligence could make that problem significantly worse.

Researchers from the Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology (KAIST) have published what they describe as the first comprehensive analysis of the energy cost of AI agents - AI systems capable of reasoning, planning, and completing tasks autonomously. Their findings show that these systems can consume up to 136.5 times as much energy per query as conventional generative AI models, raising fresh questions about whether the infrastructure supporting tomorrow's AI is ready for what's coming.

Read more