Skip to main content
  1. Home
  2. Computing
  3. Legacy Archives

Google Asking Early Buzz Users to Confirm Settings

Add as a preferred source on Google
Image used with permission by copyright holder

Beginning today, Google will begin showing a confirmation page to early users of Google Buzz, asking them to review their privacy settings and make sure they’re disclosing only information they’re comfortable with…since that may not match what Google Buzz is actually showing other people.

When Google launched Google Buzz back in February—with a lot of fanfare to Gmail users but little warning—the company took a serious shot to the chin from Gmail users and privacy advocates. As initially rolled out, Google Buzz created a public user profile that offered a public list of a user’s most frequent email contacts—essentially, publishing a portion of a user’s previously private Gmail address book for all to see.

Recommended Videos

Google has since gone back and re-worked its startup experience for Google Buzz, more clearly disclosing the nature of the service, making privacy controls more accessible, and rolling out additional controls.

The problem, of course, is that anyone who jumped into Google Buzz before Google revamped the introduction to the service may not be aware of the new privacy and management controls. (By Google’s own admission, millions of people tapped into Buzz before the changes were rolled out.)

Google’s move to inform early Buzz users about its changes comes almost a month and a half after they were initially introduced. Although the furor around the launch of Google Buzz may have served to inform early Google Buzz users of possible privacy issues, that’s not the same as having Google Buzz present a summary of the information that wil be available to others, enabling users to make changes, and requiring their confirmation.

Google has also added a comment-collapsing feature to Google Buzz discussions to make them easier to manage and scan.

Google launched Buzz in an effort to compete with the likes of Twitter and Facebook and capture real-time discussion amongst its users. Privacy groups have urged the Federal Trade Commission to look into whether the service and its launch violated consumers’ rights.

Geoff Duncan
Former Contributor
Geoff Duncan writes, programs, edits, plays music, and delights in making software misbehave. He's probably the only member…
Topics
AI is finding Apple security flaws faster than Apple can sort through them
Apple has limited how many bug reports researchers can keep open as AI tools produce both genuine Mac vulnerabilities and a flood of questionable submissions
Lighting, Architecture, Building

Apple has capped the number of security reports researchers can keep open at once after AI bug hunting put its review process under pressure, according to the Financial Times.

Some submissions describe hallucinated or purely theoretical risks. Others uncover vulnerabilities serious enough to require patches. Bynario told the FT that it found more than 50 possible macOS flaws in three weeks, including a privilege-escalation chain that could give an attacker full control of a Mac.

Read more
Anthropic is paying $1.5 billion over pirated books, but it can still legally cut up purchased ones
The settlement addressed unauthorized ebook downloads, not the destructive scanning of lawfully bought physical copies, a distinction now alarming booksellers
Book, Publication, Indoors

A federal judge has approved Anthropic’s $1.5 billion settlement over nearly half a million pirated books. The same litigation also protected a more physical method of feeding its AI systems. Anthropic bought print books, removed their bindings, scanned every page and destroyed the originals.

The legal divide came down to acquisition. The settlement covers books downloaded from LibGen and PiLiMi, while the court treated Anthropic’s one-for-one conversion of purchased books into private digital files as fair use. Training AI models on lawfully acquired material was also considered transformative.

Read more
Google Earth’s AI misadventure lasted only a day. It was a tale of dangerous ignorance.
Nuclear reactors, tanks, and historical destruction on a life-like satellite map? Yeah, that's bad.
Nano Banana AI image generator representation.

Technology behemoths are clearly not reading the room, or they are just moving faster than they should when it comes to AI deployment. Google has already stuffed its Gemini AI in every corner of its software stack, from Android to daily productivity tools like Gmail that are used by hundreds of millions of users every day. AI is everywhere. Not all of it is bad, mind you. But in a few places, it just feels forced.

In its latest AI-fication experiment, the company targeted Google Earth. The idea was to let the audience use its Nano Banana 2 AI image generator and make images that can be placed on the map view. On paper, it's a cool idea. What would the Colosseum of Rome look like in your urban neighborhood? Yeah, fun stuff like that.

Read more