Skip to main content
  1. Home
  2. Computing
  3. Legacy Archives

Pixel Qi 3Qi Netbook Screen Kits Go on Sale

Add as a preferred source on Google

Much-lauded display startup Pixel Qi spun off from the OLPC project promising advanced display technologies that handled both high-performance, full-color graphics like an LCD but were high contrast and sunlight-readable like an ereader display—and used just a fraction of the power of a traditional LCD. Although technology demos have been promising, nobody has been able to set hands on Pixel Qi displays…until now. Pixel Qi has finally made good on its promise to offer screen replacement kits for netbooks and systems with 10.1-inch displays. And although they cost about as much as a new netbook, they really do seem to be everything they promised. Kits are now available through Make Magazine for $275 specifically for the Samsung N130 and Lenovo S10-2 netbooks—although, of course, folks are free to try leveraging them into other systems, and PIxel Qi says they’re testing on other netbooks.

Image used with permission by copyright holder

The Pixel Qi display works much like a standard backlit LCD display, except that each pixel also has a reflective capability, meaning that in conditions with large amounts of ambient light (e.g., outdoors) the display can present a high-contrast, highly readable display. Pixel Qi says the 3Qi uses about 80 percent less power in reflective mode while offering better contrast than the best eletrophoretic displays along with about the same reflectivity.

Recommended Videos

Of course, Pixel Qi isn’t installing these screens in people’s notebooks for them: this is strictly a DIY operation left up to the buyer…or the buyer’s tech-comfy friends. PIxel Qi describes the screen replacement process as taking about five minutes—but we suspect that’s for people who are comfortable ripping apart their electronics and have pulled screens many times before. However, the process only involves removing a handful of screws, unsnapping the screen’s front plastic bezel, and disconnecting a cable. Of course, installing the Pixel Qi display will likely void any warranty remaining on the netbook, so customers are advised to be fully informed before deciding to upgrade their display.

Image used with permission by copyright holder
Geoff Duncan
Former Contributor
Geoff Duncan writes, programs, edits, plays music, and delights in making software misbehave. He's probably the only member…
AI is finding Apple security flaws faster than Apple can sort through them
Apple has limited how many bug reports researchers can keep open as AI tools produce both genuine Mac vulnerabilities and a flood of questionable submissions
Lighting, Architecture, Building

Apple has capped the number of security reports researchers can keep open at once after AI bug hunting put its review process under pressure, according to the Financial Times.

Some submissions describe hallucinated or purely theoretical risks. Others uncover vulnerabilities serious enough to require patches. Bynario told the FT that it found more than 50 possible macOS flaws in three weeks, including a privilege-escalation chain that could give an attacker full control of a Mac.

Read more
Anthropic is paying $1.5 billion over pirated books, but it can still legally cut up purchased ones
The settlement addressed unauthorized ebook downloads, not the destructive scanning of lawfully bought physical copies, a distinction now alarming booksellers
Book, Publication, Indoors

A federal judge has approved Anthropic’s $1.5 billion settlement over nearly half a million pirated books. The same litigation also protected a more physical method of feeding its AI systems. Anthropic bought print books, removed their bindings, scanned every page and destroyed the originals.

The legal divide came down to acquisition. The settlement covers books downloaded from LibGen and PiLiMi, while the court treated Anthropic’s one-for-one conversion of purchased books into private digital files as fair use. Training AI models on lawfully acquired material was also considered transformative.

Read more
Google Earth’s AI misadventure lasted only a day. It was a tale of dangerous ignorance.
Nuclear reactors, tanks, and historical destruction on a life-like satellite map? Yeah, that's bad.
Nano Banana AI image generator representation.

Technology behemoths are clearly not reading the room, or they are just moving faster than they should when it comes to AI deployment. Google has already stuffed its Gemini AI in every corner of its software stack, from Android to daily productivity tools like Gmail that are used by hundreds of millions of users every day. AI is everywhere. Not all of it is bad, mind you. But in a few places, it just feels forced.

In its latest AI-fication experiment, the company targeted Google Earth. The idea was to let the audience use its Nano Banana 2 AI image generator and make images that can be placed on the map view. On paper, it's a cool idea. What would the Colosseum of Rome look like in your urban neighborhood? Yeah, fun stuff like that.

Read more