Skip to main content

AMD, Intel Lock Horns Over Processor Patents

AMD, Intel Lock Horns Over Processor Patents

Historically, there has been little love lost between chipmakers Intel and AMD, with the companies famously locked in battle over antitrust allegations and, of course, in a perpetual marketing war over whose processors offer more bang for the buck. Now AMD’s recent move to spin off its manufacturing plants into the new company GlobalFoundries has raised Intel’s ire, with Intel claiming AMD is violating a patent cross-licensing agreement by letting GlobalFoundries have access to its intellectual property. AMD says it considers GlobalFoundries a subsidiary company and, therefore, it is in full compliance with the agreement.

In 2001, AMD set up a cross-licensing agreement with Intel that enables it to design and manufacturer x86-compatible processors, although the specific terms of that agreement are not currently available to the public. According to Intel, the nature of AMD’s agreement with Abu Dhabi’s Advanced Technology Investment Company (ATIC) violates that agreement, presumably because ATIC is effectively the majority stakeholder in GlobalFoundries. Intel says it has asked AMD to make the relevant parts of the licensing agreement public, but that AMD has so far declined to do so.

For its part, AMD believes it is in compliance with the 2001 agreement and that Intel’s actions are merely a means to distract attention from the global antitrust scrutiny the company is facing. Furthermore, AMD believes that Intel’s actions constitute “bad faith,” and could therefore be grounds for Intel losing access to AMD’s patents under the 2001 agreement. If Intel were to be found to be acting in bad faith, AMD would not lose access to Intel’s patents covered under the deal.

AMD also says it would be fine with making the terms of the cross-licensing agreement public…if Intel is also willing to go public with evidence submitted in AMD’s 2005 U.S. antitrust case against Intel. So far, Intel has not responded to AMD’s offer; AMD’s case against Intel is currently scheduled for trial in 2010.

The terms of the cross-licensing agreement stipulate the companies must try to resolve the dispute through mediation; if negotiations fail, lawsuits will likely be both companies’ next step. According to industry sources, the cross-licensing agreement is due to expire on January 1, 2011.

Editors' Recommendations

Geoff Duncan
Former Digital Trends Contributor
Geoff Duncan writes, programs, edits, plays music, and delights in making software misbehave. He's probably the only member…
What’s the best CPU under $400? Here are Intel and AMD’s best options
AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D held between fingertips.

If you want a powerful processor, you can get a lot for your money at around the $400 mark. Both AMD and Intel have stellar options that offer high performance in gaming and productivity, and that even compete with the very best of the best that cost hundreds of dollars more. The Ryzen 7 7800X3D and Core i7-14700K have lots of cores, super-high clock speeds, and boatloads of cache. Here's how they stack up in a classic head-to-head comparison of the best CPUs under $400.
Pricing and availability
AMD launched the Ryzen 7 7800X3D in April 2023, just over six months after the debut of the rest of the Zen 4 generation of processors. It debuted with a price tag of $450, though that initially fell to $400, then to around $370, which is the price at most retailers at the time of this writing. Stock remains widely available, despite it being one of the most popular processors available today.

 

Read more
Intel said AMD’s Ryzen 7000 is snake oil
AMD CEO Lisa Su holding an APU chip.

In what is one of the most bizarrely aggressive pieces of marketing material I've seen, Intel compared AMD's Ryzen 7000 mobile chips to snake oil. Over the weekend, Intel posted its Core Truths playbook, which lays out how AMD's mobile processor naming scheme misleads customers. The presentation has since been deleted, according to The Verge.

There's an element of truth to that, which I'll get to in a moment, but first, the playbook, which was first spotted by VideoCardz. Intel starts with claiming that there's a "long history of selling half-truths to unsuspecting customers" alongside images of a snake oil salesman and a suspicious used car seller. This sets up a comparison between the Ryzen 5 7520U and the Core i5-1335U. Intel's chip is 83% faster, according to the presentation, due to the older architecture that AMD's part uses.

Read more
AMD isn’t competing with Intel anymore — Threadripper just wins
The Threadripper 7980X CPU installed in a motherboard.

The era of high-end desktops (HEDT) disappeared a few years ago. Intel's long-abandoned X-series processors dried up, and AMD relegated its Threadripper CPUs to the enterprise market, leaving enthusiasts with cash to burn to settle for flagships instead of HEDT. That is, until now.

AMD's Threadripper 7000 CPUs are bringing HEDT back, making even the best processors look puny in comparison. After taking a generation off, AMD is reviving Threadripper for consumer desktops. That fact alone makes these CPUs important -- even you ignore the obscene performance numbers they put up. AMD has now carved out a performance class that it can call its own, straddling the line between flagship consumer chips and data center CPUs where Intel doesn't have any options.

Read more