Skip to main content
  1. Home
  2. Computing
  3. Legacy Archives

Nielsen: Bing Continues to Gain Search Share

Add as a preferred source on Google
Nielsen: Bing Continues to Gain Search Share
Image used with permission by copyright holder

There’s no question that Google is still by far the dominant player in the Internet search market, but according to media metrics giant The Nielsen Company, Microsoft’s Bing continues to increase its share of the U.S. search market. The latest figures from Nielsen show that, during August 2009, the number of queries handled by Bing increased by 22 percent compared to the previous month, and Bing has now cracked the double digit mark, accounting for 10.7 percent of all U.S. Internet searches, if one rolls in MSN Search and Windows Live search.

Google still remains the top dog, accounting for some 64.6 percent of U.S. searches during August; Yahoo accounted for an even 16 percent of searches. AOL Search and Ask.com rounded out the top five, accounting for 3.1 percent and 1.7 percent of U.S. search queries during August, respectively.

Recommended Videos

Although Bing seems to be experiencing big gains, they seem to be coming at the expense of Yahoo Search, which saw its month-to-month share of the U.S. search market decline by 4.2 percent during August. Most other search engines experienced month-on-month growth in the number of queries they handled during the month—including Google, which saw a 2.6 percent uptick in the number of searches it executed. The only other loser was Comcast Search, which saw a 21.6 percent month-to-month drop, and now accounts for 0.5 percent of U.S. searches.

Geoff Duncan
Former Contributor
Geoff Duncan writes, programs, edits, plays music, and delights in making software misbehave. He's probably the only member…
OpenAI is investigating more incidents of AI agents going rogue days after hack
OpenAI logo on Microsoft surface

It appears that the "AI agents going rogue" tale has more to it than what AI giants have revealed publicly so far. Merely days after OpenAI announced that its AI agents went rogue and hacked Hugging Face, Anthropic dropped a similar bombshell. Soon, it was discovered that not just one, but multiple services were compromised. Well, it seems there are even more layers to it.

Reuters reports that OpenAI has found more incidents of AI agents escaping their software containment environment during research. Citing sources with knowledge of the incident, the outlet notes that the AI agents didn't go beyond OpenAI's software environment and affect any external service.

Read more
AI is finding Apple security flaws faster than Apple can sort through them
Apple has limited how many bug reports researchers can keep open as AI tools produce both genuine Mac vulnerabilities and a flood of questionable submissions
Lighting, Architecture, Building

Apple has capped the number of security reports researchers can keep open at once after AI bug hunting put its review process under pressure, according to the Financial Times.

Some submissions describe hallucinated or purely theoretical risks. Others uncover vulnerabilities serious enough to require patches. Bynario told the FT that it found more than 50 possible macOS flaws in three weeks, including a privilege-escalation chain that could give an attacker full control of a Mac.

Read more
Anthropic is paying $1.5 billion over pirated books, but it can still legally cut up purchased ones
The settlement addressed unauthorized ebook downloads, not the destructive scanning of lawfully bought physical copies, a distinction now alarming booksellers
Book, Publication, Indoors

A federal judge has approved Anthropic’s $1.5 billion settlement over nearly half a million pirated books. The same litigation also protected a more physical method of feeding its AI systems. Anthropic bought print books, removed their bindings, scanned every page and destroyed the originals.

The legal divide came down to acquisition. The settlement covers books downloaded from LibGen and PiLiMi, while the court treated Anthropic’s one-for-one conversion of purchased books into private digital files as fair use. Training AI models on lawfully acquired material was also considered transformative.

Read more