Skip to main content
  1. Home
  2. Computing
  3. News

Are Sofia and Broxton just the first casualties in an Intel Atom cull?

Add as a preferred source on Google

Intel seems to be killing off its low-cost Atom chip family, the processors used in a host of smartphones, tablets, and other small form factor devices. The strategy is likely intended to allow the manufacturer to concentrate its interests on other, more lucrative areas of its output.

The Atom chips code-named Sofia and Broxton are to be cancelled with immediate effect, according to a report from PC World. Sofia processors had already begun shipping, while delays had forced the Broxton chip to miss its scheduled 2016 launch date.

Recommended Videos

The culling of the Atom line is the first major element of Intel’s plan to reshuffle after the company announced an 11-percent cut to its work force, as reported by CNN. Shifting focus to products that offer a better return on investment is a smart choice, but it’s perhaps at the cost of groundwork laid in previous years.

Intel bet big on its smartphone and tablet interests, investing billions into Atom, but ultimately the company couldn’t compete with rival ARM. There have been calls for Intel to discontinue the Atom line before today, owing to the poor performance that the processor delivered in order to achieve its budget-friendly price tag.

It’s likely that the company will now attempt to push its Core M processors in place of Atom chips. Those parts offer up more power and better performance, but that would in turn be reflected in their pricing.

The resources freed up by Intel’s termination of the Sofia and Broxton chips will likely help bolster the company’s efforts to get in on the ground floor with 5G components. 5G networks are expected to become the norm over the next few years, which could be a huge boon for a company able to supply the necessary chips and modems.

Brad Jones
Brad is an English-born writer currently splitting his time between Edinburgh and Pennsylvania. You can find him on Twitter…
Google’s new Magic Pointer Play Store listing reveals a Gemini shortcut built for Googlebooks
The unannounced app turns the cursor into a contextual AI tool for search, image creation, and shopping
Plant, Text, Business Card

Google has quietly published a new Play Store listing for Magic Pointer, an unannounced app built for Googlebooks. Updated on July 10, the app turns the cursor into a Gemini shortcut that can act on whatever a user selects on screen.

Magic Pointer can send an image to Lens, generate a related image, or surface a shopping action without forcing users to open a separate chatbot. Regular Android devices currently show as incompatible, so the listing offers an early preview rather than a broad release.

Read more
You can stop using AI, but this new report says you probably can’t escape it
A UK survey found that most people feel AI exposure is unavoidable, raising harder questions about consent, privacy, and whether opting out is still realistic
AI Chatbots

More people are trying to use less AI, but avoiding it altogether may already be impossible.

A survey of 2,055 UK adults found that 42% deliberately limit how much AI they use. Another 70% said avoiding AI exposure would be difficult or impossible, even when they actively wanted less of it.

Read more
The face on an AI interviewer may matter as much as the decision it makes
Researchers found that race and gender matching changed how fairly rejected applicants viewed an automated interview, even though everyone received the same outcome
File, Computer Hardware, Electronics

An AI hiring system can treat every applicant the same and still leave some people feeling targeted. Researchers found that rejected candidates judged an automated interview differently depending on the race and gender of the avatar delivering the result.

Around 220 participants completed a simulated interview for a fictional customer support role with one of four photorealistic AI avatars. Everyone was rejected, yet perceptions of fairness shifted with the interviewer’s appearance. An algorithm audit could miss that reaction because candidates don’t experience the system as raw code. They experience a face asking questions and judging their answers.

Read more