Skip to main content

Subaru teases the future classic BRZ STI, but what about the Scion FR-S?

The inevitable has happened. Subaru has released a couple teaser photos of the upcoming BRZ STI. While this is very good news, it’s not the promise of a yet another turbocharged Subaru that has us excited. Rather, it’s the further differentiation of the BRZ from its twin – the Scion FR-S – that has us tickled.

For those who’ve been living under a rock for the last few years, the BRZ and the FR-S are – save a few minor differences – essentially the same car. The two rear-wheel drive economical sports cars are the product of a Subaru and Toyota partnership. Subaru did the designing while Toyota fitted the bill and tacked on the Scion badge.

Recommended Videos

Although Subaru has been charged with the manufacturing of the twin sports cars, Toyota gets to keep 90 percent of the production run for itself, leaving only a nominal number to be sold as Subaru BRZs. As the years tick on, however, Subaru’s share of the production will dwindle and eventually drop to zero. One day, the BRZ won’t exist at all. Sad, that.

Why would Subaru do such a deal? It was all about technology. Toyota wanted a rear-drive sports car and Subaru wanted a direct fuel injection system. Toyota had the D4-S direct injection system from the Lexus IS-F to spare and Suby had the engineering prowess to get a rear-drive coupe completed. The deal was done.

Subaru, while it can, is going big with its share of the riches. What exactly the upcoming BRZ STI will have under the hood is yet unknown. It’ll likely be a big turbo, though, based upon what we’ve seen of the WRX STI over the years. We know Subaru has the ability to turbocharge the new 2.0-liter boxer four-cylinder, too, as a very similar engine is found under the hood of the new 250hp Forester XT. If I had to guess, I’d wager the BRZ STI will make somewhere in the 280 horsepower range. From there, Subaru will likely stiffen suspension further, add some bigger brakes, and cover the little BRZ with brightly-colored STI badges.

It will surely be quite a kick to drive and an instant classic.

subaru-brz-sti-teaser-3_1035
Image used with permission by copyright holder

As exciting as it is, though, the BRZ STI doesn’t really matter. It’ll be made in very small quantities and for a very short amount of time. It’ll be a magical car, yes, but it won’t have the impact or staying power of the FR-S. The BRZ is a flash in the pan, a blip on the radar. The FR-S, however, is here for the long haul. So rather than drool over the BRZ STI, let’s instead look at what this turning point means for the future of the FR-S.

Many of us in the automotive media had been speculating since the launch of both the BRZ and the FR-S that forced induction variants would likely follow. I presumed that Suby would turbo and Scion would supercharge. Last week, however, Toyota stated it would not be fitting chargers to the FR-S but instead will likely focus on a hybrid-powered performance model. While this has me rather disappointed, it makes sense and is totally inline with branding: Subaru is known for its turbos and Toyota is known for its hybrids.

Hybrids are still widely seen as doddling little eco machines, despite the existence of the McLaren P1 and the LaFerrari. And Toyota is effectively married to hybridization. In order to propel hybridization to the forefront of the market, of which hybrids only comprise around four or five percent, they need a big boost in popularity. An affordable true sports car with satisfying performance and a hybrid drivetrain would do that trick quite nicely.

Think of it like this: car companies routinely build supercars not for the profits gleaned from the sale of the limited-run supercar itself, of which there are little, but rather because of the attention the high-performance models attract. Few people can afford an Audi R8 but they want to feel like they’re apart of the coolness surrounding an Audi R8. So they go buy an A3 or A4.

2013-Scion-FR-S-press-image
Image used with permission by copyright holder

The hybrid FR-S, I wager, would have the same benefit but with the addition of drawing attention and buyers to the brand but also prove profitable – unlike supercars.

Should the hybrid FR-S hit the market, though, it wouldn’t be the first affordable sport hybrid. Honda, as you might recall, still makes and ‘sells’ the CR-Z sport hybrid. It was a great idea. But it sadly proved neither sporty nor fuel-efficient. Hybrid FR-S or not, however, Honda has its sights set on Scion. I recently spoke with a Honda representative who said that should Honda go after the FR-S, it could make a much, much better car. He cited the late S2000 as a perfect example of Honda’s rear-wheel drive sports car building prowess. That could prove to be a very, very good Japanese rear-drive sports car battle for us motoring enthusiasts.

Ultimately, that is all thinly-informed speculation at this point. What we do know for sure is that the fated BRZ is getting an STI treatment. And if you’re the kind of driver who can buy a turbocharged sports car and not drive the snot out of it, I’d say start saving for a down payment now. I reckon that in 25 years, a clean BRZ STI will likely be worth its weight in gold.

Nick Jaynes
Former Automotive Editor
Nick Jaynes is the Automotive Editor for Digital Trends. He developed a passion for writing about cars working his way…
Topics
The week in EV tech: From sky-high dreams to ground-level drama
tesla robotaxi feud alef in transition flight

Welcome to Digital Trends’ weekly recap of the revolutionary technology powering, connecting, and now driving next-gen electric vehicles. 
Buckle up, folks — this week we’re taking off with a look at the futuristic dream of flying electric cars possibly gliding above U.S. roads sooner than you think. But before we get carried away, let’s bring it back down to the bumpy road of present-day realities.
Even if you’re mostly interested about the tech powering the electric vehicle (EV) revolution, it’s become increasingly hard to avoid the politics around it: You guessed it, we’re talking about this week’s public feud between Tesla CEO Elon Musk and U.S. President Donald Trump.
What does this have to do with EV tech? Well, quite a lot actually. For starters, the technology behind Tesla’s Autopilot and Full-Self Driving (FSD) modes may return in the crosshairs of regulators: Despite the names, these are still driver-assist features that require active driver supervision, and until Trump’s election, they had been under heavy scrutiny by safety regulators for several years.
Last year, the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration  (NHTSA) launched an investigation into 2.4 million Tesla vehicles equipped with FSD. Big questions remain about the driver-assist system's performance under adverse, yet naturally-occurring conditions such as fog, sun glare, rain, and snow.
When Musk, who spent about $275 million to help elect Trump, was appointed to head a newly-created Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), it raised more than a few eyebrows about his power and influence over the regulators who are supposed to oversee traffic safety, and therefore Tesla.
It didn’t help that the Trump administration followed Musk’s recommendations and relaxed crash-reporting requirements put in place since 2021, while also relaxing rules to accelerate the deployment of fully-automated robotaxis.
The Trump/Musk clash takes place just as Tesla is due to launch its robotaxi pilot progam in Texas later this month. While Trump is now threatening to pull billions of dollars in government subsidies and contracts from Musk’s companies, it’s unclear whether he might pressure the Department of Transportation to again tighten the regulatory screws on Tesla. What is clear is that Trump has never been a fan of electric vehicles and is already trying to end federal subsidies on EV purchases and leases. And while he had made a big deal about buying a bright red Tesla Model S back in March, Trump now says he wants to sell it.
Back to the tech
Meanwhile, Tesla is still required to respond to information and data requests from NHTSA regarding the safety of its robotaxis by July 1. And ultimately, it should come down to the performance of the technology.
For Autopilot and FSD, Tesla has opted for less expensive navigational tech relying on multiple onboard cameras that feed AI machine-learning models. But especially for so-called adverse driving conditions, it’s the more expensive technology relying on a blend of pre-mapped roads, sensors, cameras, radar, and lidar (a laser-light radar) which has received the nod of regulators.
Waymo, the sole robotaxi service currently operating in the U.S., and Zoox, Amazon’s upcoming robotaxi service, both use that blend of navigational tech.
For its robotaxis, Tesla is said to have upped its game in terms of autonomous driving with its Hardware 4 (HW4) technology, which does include radar sensors and promises enhanced environmental perception.
Will that be enough for Tesla to convince regulators, catch up with Waymo, or compete effectively with Zoox?
We’ll have to wait and see.
Flying cars
In a recent edition, we noted that while consumer confidence about robotaxi technology is on the rise, most people also want more data before they hop into a self-driving vehicle.
What about flying taxis? According to a recent survey by Honeywell, nearly all U.S. airline fliers, or 98%, said they would consider using a so-called electric vertical take-off and landing vehicle, or eVTOL, as part of their travel journey.
But while the buzz around flying electric vehicles has mostly focused on air taxis— like Archer Aviation’s Midnight, expected to fly athletes around the 2028 LA Olympics, or Joby’s slick air taxi, backed by Toyota — one California startup is shooting for something a little more... driveable.
Meet Alef Aeronautics, a Bay Area company that wants to put the “car” back in “flying car.” This week, Alef announced it has received over 3,400 pre-orders for its electric flying vehicle, the Model A — and get this: it’s not a futuristic prototype gathering dust in a lab. Alef says production could begin by the end of 2025, or early next year.
On the ground, the Model A operates like a low-speed electric car, complete with hub motors in the wheels and—wait for it—a real steering wheel. You can legally drive it at up to 25 mph on public roads, parking it in a normal garage like any other EV. It’s refreshingly manual in an increasingly hands-free world.
But when it's time for lift off, the steering wheel takes a backseat. For vertical takeoff and flight, the Model A transforms into a drone-like aircraft. Its cabin rotates sideways to create lift, and eight electric rotors—controlled by a flight system and joysticks—take over. No pedals, no yoke, just a bit of joystick magic (or autopilot, if you prefer).
The Model A has already received the nod from regulators for test flights.
While the $300,000 price tag won’t fit everyone’s budget, the company is clearly betting on a future where you don’t have to choose between a car and a flying machine—you can have both.

Read more
8 key things you need to know from Apple’s WWDC 2025 event
From a fresh look and updated names, to new features, more intelligence and live translation
iOS 26, iPadOS 26 and macOS 26 shown on devices.

The WWDC 2025 keynote ran for just over an hour and a half. For those of you who don't fancy sitting through the whole presentation, we've pulled out the key things you need to know from the latest Apple event.

1. Welcome to the 26 club

Read more
Tesla’s robotaxi service is almost here, but it’s not the car you want to see
Silver Tesla Model Y Juniper side

Tesla chief Elon Musk has said that the automaker is aiming to launch its robotaxi service on June 22, in Austin, Texas.

“Tentatively, June 22,” Musk said in a post on X on Tuesday, adding: “We are being super paranoid about safety, so the date could shift.”

Read more