Skip to main content
  1. Home
  2. Computing
  3. Phones
  4. Features

Apple made Liquid Glass adjustable, which says plenty about Liquid Glass

The new slider is useful, welcome, and mildly hilarious after a year of Apple acting like transparent everything was the obvious future.

Add as a preferred source on Google
Text, Document, Business Card
Apple
Promotional logo for WWDC 2023.
This story is part of our complete Apple WWDC coverage

Apple’s big glassy software future now comes with a way to make it less glassy. In iOS 27, users can adjust the translucency of the Liquid Glass effect, while macOS Golden Gate adds its own Liquid Glass controls under System Settings.

Liquid Glass is still alive across Apple’s platforms, still shimmering through menus and panels, still doing the elegant UI trick Apple clearly likes. The big visual bet has already earned a dimmer switch. After a year of treating translucency like the obvious next step, WWDC’s most revealing design update may be the one that lets people dial it back.

What happens when Apple design confidence meets readability

Liquid Glass was never just a coat of paint. Apple introduced it as a broad visual language, the kind of system-wide design idea meant to make everything feel more coherent, premium, and unmistakably Apple. Then it met actual screens. The more translucent software becomes, the more it has to fight the messy layer underneath it, from busy wallpapers to crowded notifications and half-forgotten widgets.

Recommended Videos

Glassy interface design is not some forbidden Apple technique recovered from a sealed lab under Apple Park. Windows Vista was doing Aero Glass back when laptops still had DVD drives, Microsoft later revived the frosted look with Fluent Design’s Acrylic material, and Apple itself played with translucency in iOS 7.

Liquid Glass may be smoother, richer, and more technically dressed up, but the old bargain remains the same: make software look expensive, then spend the next few releases helping people see through it.

The readability complaints weren’t pulled from vapor, either. Reddit users and design-focused commenters were already calling out low contrast, notifications that could become hard to read, and text competing with whatever was sitting behind it. A glassy UI looks great until the background joins the conversation.

Comment
byu/iMacmatician from discussion
inapple

The new slider though turns that friction into a setting. Apple still wants Liquid Glass everywhere. It just seems willing to admit that not every screen needs the full aquarium treatment. That feels like the right compromise for a design system built around transparency, because transparency is only charming until the thing underneath starts arguing with the thing on top.

Why the escape hatch is the feature

Calling it a “less Liquid Glass” button is cheap, accurate, and probably unfair in that order. Apple made the right call.

A visual system this aggressive should have an escape hatch before the thing someone is trying to tap starts cosplaying as a luxury shower door.

On macOS Golden Gate, the setting can make the effect clearer, more opaque, or somewhere in between, with the more opaque version improving text legibility. That’s better than forcing everyone to live inside the same shiny idea forever. Apple can keep its design confidence, and people can read a menu without bargaining with a wallpaper.

When does polish start acting like noise

Modern software keeps chasing visual polish until the polish becomes another thing to manage.

It looks great in a keynote, then slightly less great when someone’s trying to read a menu in daylight. Screens aren’t showroom objects. They’re where people try to get through normal phone and computer chores without the interface turning every tap into a design demonstration.

Apple didn’t kill the design. It gave everyone a small, elegant way to squint less, which may turn out to be the best Liquid Glass feature of all.

Not the shiniest feature, obviously, but that was sort of the problem.

Paulo Vargas
Paulo Vargas is an English major turned reporter turned technical writer, with a career that has always circled back to…
The Mac Pro nearly received an M3 Extreme chip twice as powerful as M3 Ultra
High production costs likely killed Apple’s M3 Extreme plans
Apple's Mac Pro on a table at a press event.

Apple discontinued the Mac Pro earlier this year, ending a 20-year run for a computer that once represented the very best of the company’s desktop lineup. However, Apple reportedly had much bigger plans for the machine before ultimately replacing it with the Mac Studio.

According to Bloomberg’s Mark Gurman, Apple developed an M3 Extreme chip that could have offered twice as many CPU and GPU cores as the M3 Ultra. The processor was intended to sit above the Ultra tier and could have finally given the Mac Pro the performance advantage it badly needed. Apple eventually abandoned the chip due to concerns over production costs and limited demand for such an expensive machine.

Read more
Hidden prompts can secretly rewrite an AI’s memory, and researchers say that’s a serious problem
Researchers discover AI attack that rewrites an assistant's long-term memory
Chatbot on a smartphone.

Large language models are getting better at remembering us. Whether it's your preferred writing style, recurring tasks, shopping habits or project deadlines, AI assistants are increasingly storing long-term memories to make future conversations feel more personal and useful. But according to new research, that same feature could become one of AI's biggest security vulnerabilities.

Researchers from New Mexico State University have demonstrated a new attack called GhostWriter, capable of secretly planting false memories inside AI agents. Rather than stealing information outright, the attack manipulates what an AI remembers, potentially causing it to make dangerous decisions long after the original attack has taken place.

Read more
This experiment shows how easy it is to poison an open-weight AI model for under $100
This research raises new doubts about trusting open weight AI models.
Computer, Electronics, Laptop

Open-weight AI models have been having a moment lately. Just this month, Moonshot's massive Kimi K3 model landed close behind Claude Fable 5 and GPT 5.6 Sol in several benchmarks, all while remaining fully open-weight and downloadable by anyone.

However, Katie Paxton-Fear, a cybersecurity lecturer at Manchester Metropolitan University and staff security advocate at Semgrep, managed to poison an open-weight model and proved how easily that openness can be turned against you (via The Register).

Read more