Skip to main content

Apple to Press: Snoop Around and Pay the Price

13752_large_Circle_Of_Trust
Image used with permission by copyright holder

Apple’s policy of secrecy has often led to criticism. Apple once sued and eventually killed one of its biggest fan sites, Think Secret, for refusing to name the source of their leaks. Last year this secrecy came under sharp criticism when an employee working at parts supplier Foxconn International was beaten and died under questionable circumstances that were ruled a suicide, after losing a fourth generation iPhone prototype.

Since it has been revealed that Apple has an army of secret police that monitor its employees and report potential leakers, which are then reportedly brought in for interrogation. However, that may be mild to the virtual fortress-like security that Apple maintains in China.

Recommended Videos

In China, Apple primarily prototypes and assembles its electronics inside walled cities. Those entering or exiting are searched and have to go through fingerprint scanners. Inside the city are traditional businesses — stores, restaurants, and banks. One such city is the South China city of Longhua, run by Foxconn.

Please enable Javascript to view this content

A worker inside the city comments, “Security is tight everywhere inside the factories. They use metal detectors and search us. If you have any metal objects on you when you leave, they just call the police.”

Company officials refused to comment on the remarks. However, a Chinese industry insider anonymously stated that it was well known that Apple went to “extreme lengths” to preserve secrecy.

Much like Apple reportedly gives U.S. employees fake information to ferret out leaks, sources say that Apple gives some manufacturers prototypes to make sure they’re staying in the circle of trust. If the units leak, Apple will punish the suppliers, often times terminating contracts.

A senior official at Hon Hai Precision Industry, the Taiwanese conglomerate that owns Foxconn, comments, “This ensures that the only people who have all the secrets to any Apple product is Apple itself. Other tech companies will also look for their own sources of components to compare, but none of them do as many things in-house as Apple does.”

The workers on assembly lines don’t even know what they’re assembling in Apple’s case. Describes one supplier, “The typical production line worker will not see the product until the very last minute when actual production takes place. It’s all concentrated in the hands of a few product development teams.”

During a recent investigative report a correspondent traveling to Foxconn’s Guanlan plant was dragged away by two guards at the plant and beaten when he tried to escape. The police officer who arrived on scene was unsympathetic, stating, “You’re free to do what you want. But this is Foxconn and they have a special status here. Please understand.”

Foxconn has since apologized for the assault.

How far would Apple go to preserve that security? The recent suicide of the Foxconn worker, which some claim was a murder, certainly raises that question. However, for Apple secrecy, quite unlike anything else seen in the industry, is a way of life. Describes a former U.S. Apple employee who worked at Apple’s headquarters in Cupertino, Calif., “I didn’t even talk about [the Apple work] with my wife. It’s a culture of silence and it’s just accepted. You get used to not talking about your work, it becomes normal because everybody is doing the same thing.”

Digital Trends Staff
Digital Trends has a simple mission: to help readers easily understand how tech affects the way they live. We are your…
Apple is no longer working on smart glasses to rival Meta
Ray-Ban Meta Wayfarer smart glasses

It's been a rumor for some time now that Apple had a pair of AR glasses in development, but a new report from Mark Gurman says the company has cancelled the project. Apple has expressed a lot of interest in the AR/VR space, but its first attempt with the Vision Pro didn't make the splash the company expected. Its over-the-top price and more professionally-focused applications led to fewer sales and a lot of excess stock.

The goal was to create a competitor to the Meta's Ray-Ban smart glasses, but Gurman says the cancellation comes in the wake of an attempt to change and improve the design of the glasses. The first version of the glasses would link with an iPhone, but its limited power meant applications were limited — and the demands of the device also had an impact on phone battery life. Apple pivoted and focused on linking the glasses with a Mac instead, but that was met with poor evaluations. The development team reportedly dealt with frequently-changing goals, adding to the difficulty, until the project was cancelled.

Read more
M4 MacBook Air: Everything we know about Apple’s next laptop
Bladur's Gate 3 being played on the M3 MacBook Air.

Apple’s MacBook Air is one of the best MacBooks you can buy, and it’s also one of the most affordable ways into the Mac ecosystem. If you’ve been thinking about taking the plunge and buying one, you’re in luck, as a new model equipped with Apple’s M4 chip is right around the corner.

Here, we’ve put together all the info we have about the M4 MacBook Air. Whatever it is you want to know about Apple’s next laptop, you’re in the right place.
Price and release date

Read more
Apple isn’t addressing hardware threat to M-series Macs
A person running Steam on the M4 MacBook Pro. Rocket League is up on the screen

Security researchers have discovered new security flaws affecting Apple devices with M2 or A15 chips and onwards. This includes iPhones, iPads, Mac laptops, and Mac desktops. The vulnerabilities, dubbed SLAP and FLOP and first reported by Bleeping Computer, could allow attackers to read information from a user’s open web tabs. Depending on the tabs you have open, this could put sensitive data like passwords and banking information at risk. 

This isn’t a software problem, but rather a hardware flaw that affects CPUs and leaves them vulnerable to side channel attacks. This kind of exploit measures CPU activity and uses factors like power consumption, timing, and sound to infer information about the user’s behavior. The Spectre and Meltdown flaws from 2018 worked in a similar way.

Read more