Skip to main content
  1. Home
  2. Computing
  3. Legacy Archives

Chrome Browser Share Passes Apple’s Safari

Add as a preferred source on Google
Google Chrome Logo
Image used with permission by copyright holder

Google’s Chrome browser only just released actual beta versions for Mac OS X and Linux, but new data from Net Applications shows the browser gaining some serious traction amongst Internet users: according to the latest stats, in December 2009 Chrome became the third most popular browser on the Internet in terms of usage share, surpassing Apple’s Safari for the number three slot. Net Applications found that Microsoft’s Internet Explorer (all versions) accounts for about 62.7 percent of the worldwide browser market, while Mozilla’s Firefox accounts for about 24.6 percent of the worldwide market. At number three, Chrome, with a 4.6 percent share—and that’s up from 3.9 percent the previous month, a proportionate month-to-month share increase of almost 18 percent.

Although it might be tempting to attribute some of Chrome’s newfound popularity to Mac OS X users switching over from Safari, that doesn’t seem terribly likely: Safari’s own market share increased month to month from 4.4 to 4.5 percent, and Chrome doesn’t yet support browser extensions on Mac OS X, meaning that one of the main reasons to use Chrome (besides speed) simple isn’t yet available to Mac users.

Recommended Videos

Net Applications’ figures also show continued erosion of Internet Explorer’s dominant market position, dropping from 63.6 percent to 62.7 percent month to month. However, Firefox also saw a slight month-to-month drop, slipping from 24.7 percent in November to 24.6 percent in December.

Geoff Duncan
Former Contributor
Geoff Duncan writes, programs, edits, plays music, and delights in making software misbehave. He's probably the only member…
OpenAI is investigating more incidents of AI agents going rogue days after hack
OpenAI logo on Microsoft surface

It appears that the "AI agents going rogue" tale has more to it than what AI giants have revealed publicly so far. Merely days after OpenAI announced that its AI agents went rogue and hacked Hugging Face, Anthropic dropped a similar bombshell. Soon, it was discovered that not just one, but multiple services were compromised. Well, it seems there are even more layers to it.

Reuters reports that OpenAI has found more incidents of AI agents escaping their software containment environment during research. Citing sources with knowledge of the incident, the outlet notes that the AI agents didn't go beyond OpenAI's software environment and affect any external service.

Read more
AI is finding Apple security flaws faster than Apple can sort through them
Apple has limited how many bug reports researchers can keep open as AI tools produce both genuine Mac vulnerabilities and a flood of questionable submissions
Lighting, Architecture, Building

Apple has capped the number of security reports researchers can keep open at once after AI bug hunting put its review process under pressure, according to the Financial Times.

Some submissions describe hallucinated or purely theoretical risks. Others uncover vulnerabilities serious enough to require patches. Bynario told the FT that it found more than 50 possible macOS flaws in three weeks, including a privilege-escalation chain that could give an attacker full control of a Mac.

Read more
Anthropic is paying $1.5 billion over pirated books, but it can still legally cut up purchased ones
The settlement addressed unauthorized ebook downloads, not the destructive scanning of lawfully bought physical copies, a distinction now alarming booksellers
Book, Publication, Indoors

A federal judge has approved Anthropic’s $1.5 billion settlement over nearly half a million pirated books. The same litigation also protected a more physical method of feeding its AI systems. Anthropic bought print books, removed their bindings, scanned every page and destroyed the originals.

The legal divide came down to acquisition. The settlement covers books downloaded from LibGen and PiLiMi, while the court treated Anthropic’s one-for-one conversion of purchased books into private digital files as fair use. Training AI models on lawfully acquired material was also considered transformative.

Read more