Google reflects on ‘man vs. machine’ Go series

By Brad Jones March 17, 2016

alphago go board — Image used with permission by copyright holder

In the wake of AlphaGo’s 4-1 victory over internationally renowned Go player Lee Sedol, Google has published a blog post ruminating on the win and what it means for the company going forward. The post was written by Demis Habassis, the CEO and co-founder of DeepMind, which Google acquired back in 2014.

Habassis notes that public interest in the series was far beyond the company’s wildest expectations. Search queries related to Go saw a dramatic increase in the United States, tens of millions of viewers tuned in to watch the games live in China and sales of Go boards shot up in places such as Korea.

AlphaGo managed to pull off a convincing victory over the 9-dan professional Lee, but this was not the expected result ahead of the contest. Habassis notes that the result came as something of a surprise even to the team working on the project, but takes the time to commend Lee for his victory in the fourth game.

A healthy $1 million prize fund was amassed for the event, which Google and DeepMind will donate to charity. The bulk of the money will apparently be given to organizations that help promote STEM education programs, with a portion being directed towards UNICEF.

While the charity donation is a useful byproduct of the win, the greatest benefit to DeepMind comes from the successful implementation of its technology. The series was billed as “man vs. machine,” but Habassis praises Lee for pushing his team forward and helping to further their research in the process.

That said, the CEO lays down a Korean quote pertaining to Go to temper any inflated expectations — “Don’t be arrogant when you win or you’ll lose your luck.”

A victory over Lee is a huge moment for DeepMind and a compelling statement on the progress researchers are making with regards to machine learning and artificial intelligence. However, there’s still a long way to go before organizations like Google and DeepMind can do as much as they intend to with this kind of technology.

Editors' Recommendations

Topics

Contributor

Brad is an English-born writer currently splitting his time between Edinburgh and Pennsylvania. You can find him on Twitter…

Computing

Google Meet vs. Zoom

high school senior part 2 college freshman zoom classroom

With working from home more popular than ever, videoconferencing services like Google Meet and Zoom are proving to be invaluable resources for small businesses, major corporations, and everyday netizens alike. Google Meet has only been on the market since 2017, but Google released a free version of Meet in late April 2020 in response to gaining 100 million daily users due to global restrictions on working at the office.

Zoom remains the king of the heap, with over 200 million daily users and a bevy of sophisticated features. Still, the free version of Google Meet offers users a web-based videoconferencing service that doesn't require downloading a desktop version to use and is accessible for anyone who has a Google account. Each service has its pros and cons, but both are excellent at connecting people face-to-face across the internet at no cost. Read on to learn more about how Google Meet compares to Zoom and to determine which is best for you.

Computing

Google’s new Series One monitors include a 65-inch Surface Hub competitor

Google Series One monitor on desk.

Google just launched two new monitors made for videoconferencing alongside a slew of new accessories for meetings. Available in either a desk-size 27-inch configuration or a larger 65-inch conference room size, the new Google Series One monitors are made specifically for your Google Meet calls. The smaller monitor is called the Series One Desk 27, while the larger one is named the Series One Board 65.

Like the competing Microsoft Surface Hub, both Series One monitors come with an integrated digital whiteboard, a passive stylus that you can use on the touchscreen, an integrated 5-megapixel camera, speakers, and microphones. Given that these are made for enterprise purposes, Google's pricing will reflect that market. The Desk 27 will retail for $1,999.

Mobile

Apple and Google are going to need to open up their app stores in South Korea

Apple and Google will now be mandated to allow for alternate payment systems for apps in the App Store and Play Store, respectively, at least in South Korea. The move comes as part of an amendment to the Telecommunications Business Act that bars companies from forcing third-party developers to use their in-app payment systems for in-app purchases. It will also require app store operators to speedily approve apps and prevent them from deleting apps from the stores without a reasonable explanation, the Wall Street Journal reports.

Apple and Google's app store practices have come under scrutiny over the past few years. In addition to rules around what content may or may not be admitted, developers have increasingly expressed ire about the standardized 30% commission required for each in-app transaction. This comes as a result of both companies mandating the use of their respective billing systems, with exceptions being made to select types of apps (food delivery services, for example.)