Skip to main content
  1. Home
  2. Computing
  3. Legacy Archives

Google Wins Arbitration Over Sham Domains

Add as a preferred source on Google

In a decision announced today, the National Arbitration Forum found Google, Inc. has legal rights to the domain names googkle.com, ghoogle.com, gfoogle,com, and gooigle.com, which bear a close resemblance to Google’s own google.com. Google registered its domain name in September 1999; the offending domains were registered in late 2000 and early 2001 by Sergey Gridasov of St. Petersburg, Russia, under the business name Computer Services Langenbach Gmbh.

Arbitrator Paul Dorf found the domain names were confusingly similar to Google’s, and that Gridasov had registered the domains in bad faith. Further, Dorf found that Gridasov used the domains to direct visitors to Web sites which attempted to download viruses, trojan horses, and spyware onto visitors’ computers, and that he presumably profited from the confusion with Google’s own domain.

Recommended Videos

Gridasov failed to answer at the proceedings, so the arbitrator was enabled to accept all reasonable, non-contradictory components Google’s complaint as true. Google filed its complaint May 11, 2005, shortly after warnings regarding googkle.com began to circulate widely on the Internet.

The National Arbitration Forum is one of several dispute resolution organizations which hears thousands of domain name disputes every year as part of ICANN‘s Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy as an alternative to civil or trademark lawsuits.

The disputed domains

Geoff Duncan
Former Contributor
Geoff Duncan writes, programs, edits, plays music, and delights in making software misbehave. He's probably the only member…
Topics
OpenAI is investigating more incidents of AI agents going rogue days after hack
OpenAI logo on Microsoft surface

It appears that the "AI agents going rogue" tale has more to it than what AI giants have revealed publicly so far. Merely days after OpenAI announced that its AI agents went rogue and hacked Hugging Face, Anthropic dropped a similar bombshell. Soon, it was discovered that not just one, but multiple services were compromised. Well, it seems there are even more layers to it.

Reuters reports that OpenAI has found more incidents of AI agents escaping their software containment environment during research. Citing sources with knowledge of the incident, the outlet notes that the AI agents didn't go beyond OpenAI's software environment and affect any external service.

Read more
AI is finding Apple security flaws faster than Apple can sort through them
Apple has limited how many bug reports researchers can keep open as AI tools produce both genuine Mac vulnerabilities and a flood of questionable submissions
Lighting, Architecture, Building

Apple has capped the number of security reports researchers can keep open at once after AI bug hunting put its review process under pressure, according to the Financial Times.

Some submissions describe hallucinated or purely theoretical risks. Others uncover vulnerabilities serious enough to require patches. Bynario told the FT that it found more than 50 possible macOS flaws in three weeks, including a privilege-escalation chain that could give an attacker full control of a Mac.

Read more
Anthropic is paying $1.5 billion over pirated books, but it can still legally cut up purchased ones
The settlement addressed unauthorized ebook downloads, not the destructive scanning of lawfully bought physical copies, a distinction now alarming booksellers
Book, Publication, Indoors

A federal judge has approved Anthropic’s $1.5 billion settlement over nearly half a million pirated books. The same litigation also protected a more physical method of feeding its AI systems. Anthropic bought print books, removed their bindings, scanned every page and destroyed the originals.

The legal divide came down to acquisition. The settlement covers books downloaded from LibGen and PiLiMi, while the court treated Anthropic’s one-for-one conversion of purchased books into private digital files as fair use. Training AI models on lawfully acquired material was also considered transformative.

Read more