Skip to main content
  1. Home
  2. Computing
  3. Legacy Archives

Nvidia Introduces GTX 260 and 280

Add as a preferred source on Google
Nvidia Introduces GTX 260 and 280
Image used with permission by copyright holder

Video graphics developer Nvidia has announced its new line of GTZ 200 graphics processors, starting with the GTX 260 and its larger, faster sibling, the GTX 280. Both systems feature Nvidia’s 3-WAY SLI technology, accelerated decoding of high-definition video, and packing in 192 and 240 processor cores, respectively.

The GTX 260 packs in 896 MB of dedicated video memory and a 448-bit memory interface bus width, along with a 576 MHz graphics clock and a 1,242 MHz processor clock, combining for a texture fill rate of 36.9 billion/sec. The 260 supports displays up to 2,560 by 1,600 pixels (with a max VGA resolution of 2,048 by 1,536 pixels), handles multiple monitors (2- and 3-way SLI capable too), and packs HDCP , HDMI, and S/PDIF outputs.

Recommended Videos

The GTX 280 drives the same monitor resolutions as the 260, but packs 240 processor cores on a 1,296 MHz processor clock and 602 MHz graphics clock, combining for a texture fill rate of 48.2 billion/sec. The 280 packs a mammoth 1 GB of RAM on a 512-bit memory bus running at 1,107 MHz; the 280 supports up to two displays (and is 2- and 3-way SLI capable), offers two dual-link DVI outputs and one analog HDTV out (HDCP supported; HDMI comes via an adapter), along with S/PDIF audio output for HDMI.

Both cards support Nvidia’s PureVideo, PNysX, CUDA, and HybridPower technologies.

Both cards should be available tomorrow, with the GTX 260 carrying a suggested retail price of $399, and the GTX 280 running $649.

Geoff Duncan
Former Contributor
Geoff Duncan writes, programs, edits, plays music, and delights in making software misbehave. He's probably the only member…
AI helped uncover a hidden PHP flaw. Now websites worldwide are facing millions of hacking attempts.
A critical PHP vulnerability has websites worldwide racing to install security patches.
php-flaw-websites-under-attack

PHP is the programming language behind roughly 70% of websites, and it just ran into a serious problem. Security researchers used AI to uncover a critical flaw called PHP2Shell, which could let attackers take over web servers, steal data, or disrupt online services. Since the discovery, websites worldwide have been hit with millions of attempts to exploit it.

Hackers moved fast once the flaw went public. Cloudflare CEO Matthew Prince said the attack attempts jumped from tens of thousands within 45 minutes to millions overnight, The Guardian reports.

Read more
Microsoft has begun rolling out Copilot Code for building apps with natural language
The workplace-focused vibe coding tool can pull context from emails, documents, meetings, and chats.
Microsoft Copilot code logo

Microsoft introduced Code last month as one of the three core parts of its revamped Copilot app. The app was pitched as an easy-to-use coding agent that lets users describe what they want to build in natural language, like an app, a tracker, a dashboard, an automation, or a workflow, and Copilot would build it for them.

Essentially, it's a workplace-focused vibe-coding app that turns existing work into a functional app, and Microsoft has begun rolling it out through the Frontier program.

Read more
AI agents are acting like rogues and causing a huge headache for US banks
US banks block AI agents over fears they could make unauthorised financial moves
Banking

US banks are facing a new kind of digital headache: artificial intelligence agents attempting to access customer accounts and perform actions that may go beyond what users intended. As AI tools become more capable of navigating websites and carrying out tasks independently, financial institutions are scrambling to prevent them from crossing security boundaries.

According to a report published by Axios on October 22, major US banks have detected third-party AI agents operating inside customer accounts without authorisation. Some agents reportedly appeared to attempt actions independently of user instructions. The banks involved have not publicly detailed every incident, and there is no evidence that the reported activity resulted in widespread theft of customer funds.

Read more