Skip to main content
  1. Home
  2. Computing
  3. Legacy Archives

Rambus Sues Nvidia

Add as a preferred source on Google
Rambus Sues Nvidia
Image used with permission by copyright holder

Memory technology developer Rambus has been a source of controversy in the computing industry for several years. The company filed for a patent on high-speed memory technology way back in 1990, and then worked to have that technology widely adopted by the industry—and it was. But along the way came accusations that the company was using its membership in the Joint Electron Device Engineering Council to effectively establish a monopoly over high-speed memory technology…and Rambus would go on to sue memory developers like Hynix Semiconductor for violating its patents. The court battles have been long and drawn out, but lately have been turning in Rambus’s favor, with an appeals could recently overturning Federal Trade Commission findings that Rambus had unlawfully monopolized markets.

Now, graphics developer Nvidia finds itself in Rambus’s crosshairs, with the company filing a patent infringement suit in the Northern District of California over Nvidia’s use of high-speed memory architectures. The suit alleges Nvidia products with controllers for SDR, DDR, DDR2, DDR3, GDDR, and GDDR3 memory infringe on some 17 Rambus patents; Rambus wants Nvidia barred from selling infringing products along with unspecified monetary damages.

Recommended Videos

“For more than six years, we have diligently attempted to negotiate a licensing agreement with Nvidia, but our good faith efforts have been to no avail,” said Rambus senior VP and general counsel Tom Lavelle, in a statement. “Graphics and multimedia products require leading-edge memory performance, and as Nvidia advances its product portfolio, it infringes more and more of our patents. We are left with no other recourse than litigation to protect and seek fair compensation for the use of our patented inventions.”

Nvidia declined to make any comment on the suit.

Geoff Duncan
Former Contributor
Geoff Duncan writes, programs, edits, plays music, and delights in making software misbehave. He's probably the only member…
Arc browser is shutting down in December. Long live, ya trailblazer!
The browser that revolutionizes tab management is finally riding into the sunset.
Arc browser farewell note.

Arc browser is shutting down on December 22, following a long spell of maintenance-only work as the company behind it moves forward with its successor, Dia. Earlier today, The Browser Company announced that the beloved web browser will ride into the sunset in two months, but will continue development of the Dia browser.

"That's not an easy sentence to write. We spent years building Arc and celebrating each and every release along the way: we have so much pride and love for what we made alongside the Arc community," says the company.

Read more
1Password wants AI agents to handle logins without ever taking a peek at your passwords
1Password is expanding its secure login system to Muse, Claude Duet, Dots, ChatGPT Work, and more.
1Password for AI Agents launched

The next chapter of AI is knocking on our doors, as AI agents like Meta Muse, OpenAI Dots, Gemini Spark, among others, are becoming mainstream, and they are genuinely quite useful for a lot of things, ranging from being your personal assistant all the way to helping you manage a small business. However, many are still quite hesitant about giving these agents access to your accounts and their sensitive credentials.

1Password thinks it has a fix for that trust problem. Its new 1Password for Agents platform lets AI agents sign in to your accounts without ever seeing or storing the passwords, sensitive information, or other credentials they need.

Read more
AI chatbots are falling prey to manipulative prompts that could help stalkers spy on victims
Confident answers, dangerous gaps: why survivors need humans first.
Logo, Text

Chatbots have one talent I can't stop noticing: they sound sure, even when they're wrong. Usually, that's merely annoying. When someone's safety is on the line, it's dangerous.

A new NYU Tandon study tested four AI chatbots on real questions about being stalked or controlled through devices, and experts rated 86% of replies inaccurate, incomplete, or unsafe (via NYU Tandon).

Read more