Skip to main content
  1. Home
  2. Computing
  3. News

Senator Al Franken is requesting that Oculus VR explain its controversial Rift privacy policy

Kevin Parrish
By

emteq faceteq facial sensing platform vr oculus rift review roundup
Image used with permission by copyright holder
There’s been a little bit of a stink surrounding the new Oculus Rift VR headset. The device launched last month, and with it came a new privacy policy telling owners that Oculus VR is very capable of tracking their physical movements, their mobile device’s precise location, and gathering information via pixels when using the Rift’s “Services.”

The privacy policy details were amplified by reports arriving last week that the software used to run the Oculus Rift on a PC stays active in the background. The software reportedly generates a process with full system permissions that’s always on, with the main purpose to detect when the headset is activated and placed on the user’s face, and to immediately launch Oculus Home. However, the software also supposedly frequently sends updates to servers owned by Oculus VR’s parent company, Facebook.

Recommended Videos

“Facebook owns Oculus and helps run some Oculus services, such as elements of our infrastructure, but we’re not sharing information with Facebook at this time,” Oculus VR said in an official statement to UploadVR. “We don’t have advertising yet and Facebook is not using Oculus data for advertising – though these are things we may consider in the future.”

The response also states that Oculus VR may use the collected information to improve its services and make everything work properly. That includes checking the device’s stability and addressing technical issues “to improve the overall experience.”  The company says that it created the privacy policy to make users aware about how it receives and collects data, and how that data is used. There was no argument made about the privacy policy’s actual contents.

The controversy surrounding the Oculus Rift has now gotten Minnesota Senator Al Franken involved. He sent a letter to Oculus VR CEO Brendan Iribe on Thursday addressing the privacy policy issue. Specifically, he’s requesting information about how the company collects, stores, and shares the personal data of Rift users. He also wants to know how third parties handle the information as well.

“I believe Americans have a fundamental right to privacy, and that right includes an individual s access to information about what data are being collected about them, how the data are being treated, and with whom the data are being shared,” the Senator writes. “As virtual reality technology evolves, I ask that you provide more information on Rift and how Oculus is addressing issues of privacy and security.”

On the location detection front, the Senator wants to know if Oculus VR shares this information to third parties, and if this information is actually necessary to collect to provide services. As for tracking physical movements, Senator Franken wants to know if the collection of this information is necessary, the purpose of collecting this information, and if it’s shared with third parties such as the “related companies” described in the privacy policy.

“I appreciate that Oculus’ privacy policy provides detailed information about what data are collected, when they are collected, and with which companies they are being shared,” the Senator adds. “Consumers must be able to make informed decisions about whether and with whom they share such sensitive information, and they must be assured that, when the information is shared, it will receive the utmost protection. However, questions remain regarding Oculus’ data collection of certain types of information and Oculus’ relationships with third parties.”

Oculus VR has until May 13, 2016 to answer the questions, so stay tuned.

Topics
Kevin Parrish
Kevin Parrish
Former Digital Trends Contributor
Kevin started taking PCs apart in the 90s when Quake was on the way and his PC lacked the required components. Since then…
Here’s how the M3 Max chip compares to the most powerful Windows laptops
The 14-inch MacBook Pro with M3 Max chip seen from behind.

Apple's M3 Max is an incredibly powerful chip, significantly increasing Apple Silicon's CPU and GPU performance. It's gotten a ton of press, but is it necessarily faster than the fastest Windows laptops?

To find out, we pitted it against the Lenovo Legion 9i, a gaming laptop equipped with the ultrafast Intel Core i9-13980HX and Nvidia GeForce RTX 4090, and the Asus ROG Strix Scar 17 with the AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX and the RTX 4090. We can't compare the MacBook Pro 14 with the M3 Max directly to the Lenovo and Asus in that many benchmarks, particularly gaming, due to limits in testing and cross-platform compatibility. But we could compare enough to get an idea of how these various chips stack up against each other.
A brief look at architectures
The Apple M3 Max is an ARM-based system on a chip (SoC) currently at the high end of Apple Silicon's lineup. It represents the first chips made using a 3nm process and redesigned GPU architecture. On the CPU side, Apple increased the speed of its performance cores by 15% and its efficiency cores by 30% over the M2. Overall, Apple is promising a 20% to 25% improvement in performance. On the GPU side, Dynamic Caching is one technology that speeds up a variety of GPU processes, while gamers will benefit from mesh shading and hardware-accelerated ray tracing.

Read more
Will the Vision Pro replace the Mac? Why Apple will have to tread carefully
A developer points to a Mac screen while a Vision Pro rests on the desk.

The Vision Pro headset is poised to be one of the most significant products Apple has introduced in years, and it has the potential to launch a new era of success for the company. But at the same time, there’s a risk that it could end up cannibalizing the Mac line by giving plenty of people something that could replace their computer altogether.

That means Apple has got to be very careful with how it handles the Vision Pro. It no doubt wants as many people to buy it as possible, but it wants that to happen without having to sacrifice sales of its other devices. How on earth is it going to do that?
The Mac killer?

Read more
Brighter isn’t better for OLED monitors. An expert told me the surprising reason why
An OLED gaming monitor showing an HDR demo.

"That's just too dim."

It's the same feedback I always get when reviewing OLED gaming monitors, which have made waves throughout this year. The criticism puts a damper on the otherwise jaw-dropping color and perfect contrast. The brightness measurements certainly seem to affirm that suspicion, showing they sometimes provide more than half as much brightness of a traditional LCD display. But are they really too dim?

Read more