Skip to main content

Senator Al Franken is requesting that Oculus VR explain its controversial Rift privacy policy

emteq faceteq facial sensing platform vr oculus rift review roundup
Image used with permission by copyright holder
There’s been a little bit of a stink surrounding the new Oculus Rift VR headset. The device launched last month, and with it came a new privacy policy telling owners that Oculus VR is very capable of tracking their physical movements, their mobile device’s precise location, and gathering information via pixels when using the Rift’s “Services.”

The privacy policy details were amplified by reports arriving last week that the software used to run the Oculus Rift on a PC stays active in the background. The software reportedly generates a process with full system permissions that’s always on, with the main purpose to detect when the headset is activated and placed on the user’s face, and to immediately launch Oculus Home. However, the software also supposedly frequently sends updates to servers owned by Oculus VR’s parent company, Facebook.

Recommended Videos

“Facebook owns Oculus and helps run some Oculus services, such as elements of our infrastructure, but we’re not sharing information with Facebook at this time,” Oculus VR said in an official statement to UploadVR. “We don’t have advertising yet and Facebook is not using Oculus data for advertising – though these are things we may consider in the future.”

Please enable Javascript to view this content

The response also states that Oculus VR may use the collected information to improve its services and make everything work properly. That includes checking the device’s stability and addressing technical issues “to improve the overall experience.”  The company says that it created the privacy policy to make users aware about how it receives and collects data, and how that data is used. There was no argument made about the privacy policy’s actual contents.

The controversy surrounding the Oculus Rift has now gotten Minnesota Senator Al Franken involved. He sent a letter to Oculus VR CEO Brendan Iribe on Thursday addressing the privacy policy issue. Specifically, he’s requesting information about how the company collects, stores, and shares the personal data of Rift users. He also wants to know how third parties handle the information as well.

“I believe Americans have a fundamental right to privacy, and that right includes an individual s access to information about what data are being collected about them, how the data are being treated, and with whom the data are being shared,” the Senator writes. “As virtual reality technology evolves, I ask that you provide more information on Rift and how Oculus is addressing issues of privacy and security.”

On the location detection front, the Senator wants to know if Oculus VR shares this information to third parties, and if this information is actually necessary to collect to provide services. As for tracking physical movements, Senator Franken wants to know if the collection of this information is necessary, the purpose of collecting this information, and if it’s shared with third parties such as the “related companies” described in the privacy policy.

“I appreciate that Oculus’ privacy policy provides detailed information about what data are collected, when they are collected, and with which companies they are being shared,” the Senator adds. “Consumers must be able to make informed decisions about whether and with whom they share such sensitive information, and they must be assured that, when the information is shared, it will receive the utmost protection. However, questions remain regarding Oculus’ data collection of certain types of information and Oculus’ relationships with third parties.”

Oculus VR has until May 13, 2016 to answer the questions, so stay tuned.

Kevin Parrish
Former Digital Trends Contributor
Kevin started taking PCs apart in the 90s when Quake was on the way and his PC lacked the required components. Since then…
Apple’s secret Vision Pro controller suggests it’s finally taking VR gaming seriously
A person gaming on the Apple Vision Pro headset.

You would think that Apple’s Vision Pro headset would be the perfect platform for virtual reality (VR) gaming. After all, it has a top-notch processor, super-high-resolution displays, and both VR and augmented reality (AR) capabilities. In theory, that should make it a leading device for gamers.

The reality is, unfortunately, very different, with few popular gaming titles making it onto visionOS. And really, Apple’s headset is held back by one key weakness: its lack of proper VR controller support.

Read more
Big tech is dominating my digital life — here’s how I fixed it
big tech logos around capitol hill

Big tech companies are so dominant and so far-reaching right now that people could probably live their entire digital lives interacting only with Google, Apple, Meta, Microsoft, and Amazon products. Things never got quite that bad for me but I did realize recently that I've been relying far too much on Google, plus I’ve been using Safari for years even though I don’t actually like it that much.

So I decided to find some new apps to try out and came across a nice resource full of European, open-source, or non-profit alternatives for a range of different services. It introduced me to quite a few apps that are more than good enough to replace what I was using, and although I’m not hardcore enough to completely kick Google out of my life, I’m pretty happy with the results.
What’s so bad about big tech?

Read more
Meta faces lawsuit for training AI with pirated books
A silhouetted person holds a smartphone displaying the Facebook logo. They are standing in front of a sign showing the Meta logo.

In a recent lawsuit, Meta has been accused of using pirated books to train its AI models, with CEO Mark Zuckerberg's approval. As per Ars Technica, the lawsuit filed by authors including Ta-Nehisi Coates and Sarah Silverman in a California federal court, cite internal Meta communications indicating that the company utilized the Library Genesis (LibGen) dataset—a vast online repository known for hosting pirated books—despite internal concerns about the legality of using such material.

The authors argue that Meta's actions infringe upon their copyrights and could undermine the company's position with regulators. They claim that Meta's AI models, including Llama, were trained using their works without permission, potentially harming their livelihoods. Meta has defended its practices by invoking the "fair use" doctrine, asserting that using publicly available materials to train AI tools is legal in certain cases, such as "using text to statistically model language and generate original expression."

Read more