Skip to main content
  1. Home
  2. Computing
  3. Legacy Archives

Wait…Twitter Is Earning Money?

Add as a preferred source on Google
thumb-twitter-tweet
Image used with permission by copyright holder

Microblogging service Twitter is one of those things on the Internet that’s mostly famous for being famous, not because it’s somehow discovered the key to Internet riches. Twitter’s 140-characters-at-a-time service has certainly captured a lot of attention and users’ imaginations, but it’s never had a clear business model: the company does not run advertising, does not charge for use of the service, doesn’t offer premium add-ons, and doesn’t sell any products.

Yet, BusinessWeek is reporting that Twitter may actually be in a position to post a profit for 2009, thanks to search deals it struck with Google and Microsoft’s Bing search service. So-called “real-time search”—which covers up-to-the-minute information that people are posting to places like Facebook, Twitter, and other social networking services—became a hot-button differentiator for search engines in 2009, and Twitter seems to have been able to cash in on those deals. According to BusinessWeek, Twitter will pull in about $15 million from Google and another $10 million from Microsoft for letting the services access and index public Twitter feeds. And although Twitter doesn’t publish its operating expenses, BusinessWeek estimates them to be in the range of $20 to $25 million, thanks in part to renegotiated deals with Internet and telecommunications providers.

Recommended Videos

The bottom line may mean Twitter is in the black for 2009…and it still doesn’t have a real business plan. Twitter has previously announced intentions to develop paid-for premium accounts and services, but so far no announcements have been made.

Geoff Duncan
Former Contributor
Geoff Duncan writes, programs, edits, plays music, and delights in making software misbehave. He's probably the only member…
Topics
OpenAI is investigating more incidents of AI agents going rogue days after hack
OpenAI logo on Microsoft surface

It appears that the "AI agents going rogue" tale has more to it than what AI giants have revealed publicly so far. Merely days after OpenAI announced that its AI agents went rogue and hacked Hugging Face, Anthropic dropped a similar bombshell. Soon, it was discovered that not just one, but multiple services were compromised. Well, it seems there are even more layers to it.

Reuters reports that OpenAI has found more incidents of AI agents escaping their software containment environment during research. Citing sources with knowledge of the incident, the outlet notes that the AI agents didn't go beyond OpenAI's software environment and affect any external service.

Read more
AI is finding Apple security flaws faster than Apple can sort through them
Apple has limited how many bug reports researchers can keep open as AI tools produce both genuine Mac vulnerabilities and a flood of questionable submissions
Lighting, Architecture, Building

Apple has capped the number of security reports researchers can keep open at once after AI bug hunting put its review process under pressure, according to the Financial Times.

Some submissions describe hallucinated or purely theoretical risks. Others uncover vulnerabilities serious enough to require patches. Bynario told the FT that it found more than 50 possible macOS flaws in three weeks, including a privilege-escalation chain that could give an attacker full control of a Mac.

Read more
Anthropic is paying $1.5 billion over pirated books, but it can still legally cut up purchased ones
The settlement addressed unauthorized ebook downloads, not the destructive scanning of lawfully bought physical copies, a distinction now alarming booksellers
Book, Publication, Indoors

A federal judge has approved Anthropic’s $1.5 billion settlement over nearly half a million pirated books. The same litigation also protected a more physical method of feeding its AI systems. Anthropic bought print books, removed their bindings, scanned every page and destroyed the originals.

The legal divide came down to acquisition. The settlement covers books downloaded from LibGen and PiLiMi, while the court treated Anthropic’s one-for-one conversion of purchased books into private digital files as fair use. Training AI models on lawfully acquired material was also considered transformative.

Read more