Skip to main content

Why Pay for Premium When Free is Better?

Back when Microsoft birthed MSN, it was seen as a paid subscription service designed to compete with the likes of CompuServe and AOL. As the online world evolved, the nature of online services have gradually changed from a fee-based subscription model to a free, advertiser-supported model: although CompuServe is no more, AOL has broken down its walled garden and is now offering services for free; similarly, Microsoft’s own Windows Live services freely offer the sorts of things people used to pay for every month.

Except…some people still pay for them every month, and Microsoft will still happily take that money. Windows Secrets‘ Scott Dunn points out that Microsoft still offers a $10/month service dubbed MSN Premium, but of the 21 features the service touts, only one of them—a download manager—doesn’t have a direct or near-direct equivalent available for free either via Windows Live or as part of Windows XP and/or Vista.

Recommended Videos

“It’s not all that surprising to find a software company offering a free equivalent to a competitor’s commercial product,” Dunn writes. “But Windows Live and MSN Premium are produced by the same company.”

Dunn points out that part of Microsoft’s motivation behind creating MSN Premium back in 2004 was to offer a package of services for broadband providers. And, indeed, MSN Premium is still offered by Verizon and Canada’s Bell Sympatico, although Microsoft partner Qwest has since shifted to offering Windows Live services). And Microsoft might be keeping MSN Premium going in part due to contractual obligations to those broadband providers. However, Microsoft has also made a point of saying Windows Live and MSN will continue to be developed as complimentary services, and that the distinctions between them will become more apparent as Windows Live evolves.

Right now, it basically looks like the “evolution” is that one set of services entails a monthly bill, and one doesn’t. On the other hand, Microsoft’s free services often come bearing advertising, and, in the case of tools offered separately from Windows, come with all the technical support users pay for. At least paying customers are entitled to “Free technical support”—which, for users who don’t have tech-savvy friends and family to rely on, might be worth every penny.

Geoff Duncan
Former Digital Trends Contributor
Geoff Duncan writes, programs, edits, plays music, and delights in making software misbehave. He's probably the only member…
AI is fighting fire with fire when it comes to cybersecurity
Hands on a laptop.

The surge of the generative AI (GenAI) industry has given bad actors in the hackerspace a leg up when it comes to attacking vulnerable entities. Enterprises and organizations have become easier to infiltrate due to the quickly developing technology– however, businesses are also using GenAI more often as part of their cybersecurity strategy.

A recent Splunk CISO 2024 report detailed the current state of the industry from a security standpoint, noting that board members and security experts have varying opinions on how emerging cybersecurity threats should be handled. Nevertheless, hackers benefit from being able to use GenAI more frequently and effectively. Some instances include bad actors using AI chatbots to develop malware and crack passwords.

Read more
Sam Altman confirms ChatGPT’s latest model is free for all users
ChatGPT logo on a phone

Earlier this week, OpenAI CEO Sam Altman declared the company's newest reasoning model, o3, ready for public consumption after it passed its external safety testing and announced that it would soon be arriving as both an API and ChatGPT model option in the coming weeks. On Thursday, Altman took to social media to confirm that the lightweight version, o3-mini, won't just be made available to paid subscribers at the Plus, Teams, and Pro tiers, but to free tier users as well.

https://x.com/sama/status/1882478782059327666

Read more
We now know why AMD chose to delay RDNA 4 — well, kind of
AMD announcing FSR 4 during CES 2025.

AMD hasn't been very forthcoming when it comes to information about its RX 9000 series GPUs, but we just got an update as to why the cards won't be available until sometime in March. The company cites software optimization and FSR 4 as the two reasons why it most likely decided to delay the launch of RDNA 4. But is that all there is to it, or is AMD waiting to see some of Nvidia's best graphics cards before pulling the trigger on the RX 9070 XT?

The update comes from David McAfee, AMD's vice president and general manager of the Ryzen CPU and Radeon graphics division. A couple of days ago, McAfee took to X (Twitter) to announce that AMD was excited to launch the RX 9000 series in March. This caused a bit of an uproar, with many enthusiasts wondering why AMD was choosing to wait so long.

Read more