Skip to main content
  1. Home
  2. Audio / Video
  3. Legacy Archives

When will Internet Content Truly be on the TV?

Add as a preferred source on Google
When will Internet Content Truly be on the TV?
Image used with permission by copyright holder

New York Times writer, Clive Barnes, once wrote, “Television is the first truly democratic culture — the first culture available to everyone and entirely governed by what the people want. The most terrifying thing is what people do want.” Hard to believe this was written on Dec. 30, 1968. It seems things haven’t changed much in 40 years. The Internet has provided us reasons to celebrate and reasons to cringe at what it has created. We now want that experience on our TV for the whole family to experience.

So why are we so hungry to put the Internet (a square peg) into television (a round hole)?

Recommended Videos

Many websites now offer what the content you traditionally would find on television, long-form video with commercials, but will this content on our PCs remove us from sitting in front of the television? I know some folks who no longer own a TV and now only watch shows on their computer. Thanks to sites like Hulu and many others we don’t need a television.

Television is an old term now. The large screen that you have in your living room may still be classified as a television but is it? It is basically a large screen that allows for an awesome viewing experience alone or with friends or family. It is just a screen but when connected to devices such as cable, digital cable, satellite, gaming consoles, Apple TV, TiVo, Microsoft’s MediaRoom, you now have the capability to play games, view on-demand movies, play music, program shows, order pizza, view YouTube videos, etc. Maybe we need to throw out the term television because it doesn’t apply anymore.

With all these devices, what is holding us back from having a true Internet experience through this screen if all we need is an Internet connection? Besides bandwidth issues and security concerns there is a basic business aspect that may be getting overlooked.

Anthony Smith-Chaigneau, senior vice president of business development and managing director of Alticast Gmbh, explains to Tracy Swedlow, editor-in-chief of InteractiveTV Today in a recent podcast. “We have tried putting Internet on television numerous amounts of times. Everybody is looking for quality of service on the Internet and most people are delivering video, they are not thinking of interactive.

“The world is your oyster with this technology, we just have to have a good cohesive business plan. But what we see in the market place today is: show me the money. We keep getting asked if we can put twitter on TV. We can put twitter on TV, not a problem, in fact it is quite simple but what is the business side of it and who-pays-who to make it happen?

“How do we bring a really cohesive clever set of applications that people really want when everybody is satisfied that they’re all getting their fair share of the revenue slice, which is ultimately what this is all about?”

The public interest is certainly there and the technology is catching up or already exists in some respects. We need to figure out the business side and realize there is tremendous value to companies, advertisers and individuals who take the first steps into this space. Some early adopters such as Unilever and Ford Motor Company already know the power interactive television has to offer. The “television” was a powerful medium since it began and is now poised to reinvent itself and take on a new identity, new name and new opportunities catering to an audience with an insatiable hunger for all things digital.

David Baron is an independent consultant and interactive project manager with experience launching successful projects in online, mobile, gaming and interactive television. You can reach him at david@parksideblue.com.

Ian Bell
I'm the co-founder and CEO of Digital Trends Media Group, which I launched in 2006 out of my home office to share my passion…
Google shuts down massive botnet running on 1.3 million Android TV boxes
Google says the Chinese manufacturer Videostrong Technology deliberately infected its devices and sold access to cybercriminals.
Videostrong GoogleTV box

Malware infecting Android devices isn't new, but Google's recent report is grim and concerning. The search giant has taken down a massive botnet that turned over 1.3 million Android TV set-top boxes into tools for cybercriminals. Unlike the usual attacks, where users end up downloading some shady apps from the internet, the malware here was planted inside the devices by the manufacturer itself.

According to the Google Threat Intelligence Group, the company behind it is China-based Videostrong Technology. Google has now cut ties with the manufacturer and banned it from building or supplying software for certified Android devices.

Read more
Audio-Technica’s new wireless StreamSet headset promises studio sound without the cables
Finally, a wireless headset that takes your voice seriously.
Audio technica new headset.

I've lost count of wireless headsets that sound great until the microphone switches on. That is exactly why a cord-free streaming headset from a studio-audio brand earns my attention (with a pinch of skepticism). Audio-Technica wants to change my mind, and I am all up for it.

The company has announced the "ATH-M50xSTS-WL," its first wireless headset in the StreamSet line. What's unique, however, is how the brand has combined the studio sound of its ATH-M50x monitor headphones with microphone tech from its 20 Series studio mics (via Audio-Technica).

Read more
Samsung’s new clip-on earbuds are coming to the US, and they’re not cheap
You can listen to music without blocking out the world around you, but Samsung is charging a premium for the convenience.
Samsung Galaxy Buds On earbuds

Earlier this month, Samsung unveiled its first clip-on earbuds called the Galaxy Buds On. Initially, it announced pricing and availability details only for Korea, but now the brand has revealed them for the US market as well. As per Samsung, the Galaxy Buds On will cost $229 and will be available to buy in early November. Only one color option, Black, will be available initially.

That is quite a steep price, considering the flagship Galaxy Buds 4 Pro go for $250. The Buds On also has no active noise cancellation, weaker bass response, and lower dust and water resistance. All that said, the use case is fundamentally different. While you might choose the Buds 4 Pro as the best daily drivers for your Galaxy smartphone, the Buds On keep your ear canals open, letting you listen to music while staying aware of traffic, conversations, and everything else happening around you. I can see the appeal for people who find traditional earbuds uncomfortable, or those who regularly listen to music while running or commuting.

Read more