Skip to main content
  1. Home
  2. Phones
  3. Mobile
  4. Features

5 things this $1,100 foldable does better than the Galaxy Z Fold 4

Add as a preferred source on Google

The most affordable book-style foldable, the Tecno Phantom V Fold, costs around $1,100. It undercuts the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 4 by a significant margin, especially in the market it’s selling in.

I’ve been using the Tecno Phantom V Fold for a week, and surprisingly, it does five things better than the $1,800 foldable from Samsung. It’s something that sounds impossible, but it’s true.

Recommended Videos

A bigger and more usable cover display

The Techno Phantom V Fold features a 6.42-inch cover display as compared to the 6.2-inch front screen found on the Galaxy Z Fold 4. It’s not only about the size but also the aspect ratio. While Samsung goes for a narrow form factor, the wider cover display on Tecno’s phone is more usable.

For instance, apps like Instagram sit more comfortably on the screen and load stories in a better manner. Instagram Stories on the Galaxy Z Fold 4 are squeezed to fit the screen, but it’s not so on the Phantom V Fold. The wider aspect ratio also helps the keyboard situation. I get a wider, more normal-sized keyboard on the Tecno Fold, which helps the typing experience.

The wider form factor also makes me feel more confident while holding the Phantom V Fold; I said the same for the Oppo Find N2. The narrower Galaxy Z Fold 4 feels like it’ll slip out of my hand at any instance. It hasn’t yet, but there’s always a concern that it will.

Better crease situation

The Tecno Phantom V Fold houses a waterdrop hinge design that helps minimize the crease and sits flat when folded without a gap between the screen. On the other hand, Samsung opts for a kind of hinge that has a gap between the screen when folded alongside a deeper crease on the inner display.

The crease on Tecno Fold is surprisingly minimal. When you run across your thumb, you almost can’t feel it. The crease is still there, like on the Oppo Find N2, but it isn’t a major dent in the screen like the Galaxy Z Fold 4. I’ve always said that the crease doesn’t bother me on the Samsung foldable, and I’m still on the same opinion. But minimal crease definitely helps the usability.

However, Samsung’s hinge has its advantages. For instance, the Tecno Phantom V Fold foldable doesn’t have a flex mode like the Galaxy Z Fold 4. The latter can be configured to sit comfortably half-open, but there is no such thing on the Phantom V Fold. The Tecno smartphone has a hinge design that pops it open. To fix this, you get a case with a kickstand inside the box that lets you half-open the Tecno Fold on a table.

Accessories in the box

Despite costing almost 40% less than the Galaxy Z Fold 4 in India, the Phantom V Fold packs a whole bunch of accessories in the box. Tecno is offering a charging brick, cable, a case with a kickstand, and a pre-applied screen protector on the cover screen – all of which is absent in the Samsung foldable’s box.

I usually don’t use a case on my phone, but the Phantom V Fold’s case has a built-in kickstand, which adds to the functionality of the device. It not only lets me keep the phone half-open on a table but also adds to the comfort of holding the phone. I’m now considering getting a kickstand case for my iPhone 13 Pro Max because of it.

Bigger battery with faster charging

Tecno Phantom V Fold (left) and Galaxy Z Fold (right) back.
Prakhar Khanna / Digital Trends

The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 4 is still stuck on 25W fast charging for its 4,400mAh battery, and if the leaks are to be believed, it won’t improve on the Galaxy Z Fold 5. By contrast, the Tecno Phantom V Fold packs a 5,000mAh battery that supports 45W fast charging and is rated to get to 40% with 15 minutes of charge.

After using a bunch of OnePlus, Oppo, Vivo, and Realme phones, I’ve grown used to fast charging. I need it in my day-to-day life, and the Tecno foldable supports it. However, there is no wireless charging here, unlike the 15W wireless charging support on the Samsung foldable.

An unbelievable price

Galaxy Z Fold 4 on the left and Tecno Phantom V Fold on the right.
Image used with permission by copyright holder

Tecno made a foldable that competes with the Galaxy Z Fold 4 neck to neck but is available at a fraction of the price. As MrMobile said in his Phantom V Fold review video, it’s a fold at the price of a flip. In fact, the Oppo Find N2 Flip and Galaxy Z Flip 4 are priced higher than the Tecno foldable in India.

As mentioned at the beginning, the Phantom V Fold costs around $1,100 in the markets where it’s available, whereas the Galaxy Z Fold 4 is priced at $1,800. The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 4 still has better cameras, a more polished software experience, and Flex mode.

But is it worth $700 more? I don’t think so. Tecno is working on democratizing book-style foldable phones, and as per my initial impressions, it’s winning.

Prakhar Khanna
Prakhar Khanna is an independent consumer tech journalist. He contributes to Digital Trends' Mobile section with features and…
Android desktop mode made me miss my laptop in record time
I tried writing and publishing from Google’s phone-to-monitor setup, and the future of mobile computing immediately started sweating.
Computer, Electronics, Laptop

Android 17 desktop mode has a very simple pitch. Plug your phone into a monitor, add a keyboard and mouse, and watch the slab in your pocket pretend to be a computer. I wanted to give that pitch a fair shot, so I tried using it for an actual workday instead of a cute demo.

The goal was boring on purpose: write an article, edit it, build the page in WordPress, upload whatever needed uploading, and publish the thing without running back to my laptop like a coward.

Read more
After test-driving iOS 27, my iPhone still doesn’t feel like it has made a substantial leap
Siri learned new tricks. Safari got smarter tabs. My morning routine didn't change at all.
iOS 27 new star rating feature in Photos

Every June, after Apple wraps up its annual WWDC keynote, I install the latest iOS beta on my iPhone, watch the progress bar crawl to completion, and wait for the inevitable restart. For years, picking up my phone afterward felt almost identical to how it did before the update. 

I saw the same grid of icons, the same Control Center, and the same version of Siri until iOS 26 finally broke that pattern in 2025.

Read more
Android 17 makes a strong case for ignoring Android version numbers entirely
When the most noticeable change is a better Quick Settings button, the annual update cycle starts looking more like branding than progress.
Android 17 logo.

Android 17 finally separated the Wi-Fi and mobile data buttons, and I hate how much that improved my mood. For years, Android treated internet access like one mysterious blob, as if Wi-Fi and cellular data were emotionally codependent. In Android 17 Beta 3, Google split the old combined Internet button into separate Wi-Fi and mobile data tiles, making each connection easier to switch off with a single tap.

That’s a good change, which is also why it’s a little damning. When one of the cleanest wins in a major OS update is “the buttons make sense again,” the celebration gets awkward fast.

Read more