Skip to main content

Who are the real winners and losers in Google’s Motorola sale to Lenovo?

google sells motorola winners and losers headquarters

Almost two and a half years ago Google surprised the mobile industry by plunking down $12.5 billion to acquire storied technology firm Motorola. Now, less than a year after the deal was finalized, Google is showing Motorola Mobility the door, selling it off to Lenovo for a seemingly-scant $2.91 billion.

What’s with the about-face? Was Google’s acquisition such a bad move that the company is now willing to lose more than $7 billion to get out of the deal? (It sold Moto’s set-top box division for $2.2 billion.) What does Lenovo buying Motorola mean for folks who have a Motorola phone or tablet — and what does it mean for Android?

Related Videos

Did Google throw money away on Motorola?

Google is not taking a $7 billion bath on Motorola – in fact, it’s arguably coming out ahead.

When Google bought Motorola, it got four things:

  • A mobile phone business
  • A set-top box business (serving cable and satellite operators)
  • About $5.5 billion in cash and tax credits
  • A large patent portfolio

Motorola Moto GGoogle said from the outset that its interest in Motorola was primarily about those patents. At the time, Google had just lost a bidding war for a major patent portfolio owned by the bankrupt Nortel. It believed acquiring Motorola’s patents was the next-best way to defend Android against seemingly-likely legal attacks from the likes of Apple and Microsoft.

With the Lenovo deal, Google is getting $2.9 billion for Motorola’s phone business (which now also includes tablets). Google is not selling Motorola’s patent portfolio. Google will keep the “vast majority” of those patents, with Lenovo getting a license to them and some other intellectual property.

So how does Google come out ahead? Backing up a bit, Google had already arranged to sell Motorola’s set-top box business to Arris Group for about $2.3 billion (cash and stock) even before its takeover of Motorola was technically closed. Google also offloaded things like factories for about $100 million, closed offices, kicked 4,000 people to the curb, and pocketed Motorola’s assets. So now, with the Lenovo sale, Google’s on-paper out-of-pocket cost on acquiring Motorola is down to about $1.8 billion. That’s not bad, considering Google valued Motorola’s patents and technology at about $5.5 billion when it took over the company.

Of course, Motorola Mobility has lost almost $2 billion since Google took it over — and that’s gotta burn.

Lenovo is the biggest winner

It’s currently the world’s largest PC maker (and it just bought IBM’s low-end server business for $2.3 billion: busy week!), but it’s also the world’s fourth largest smartphone maker, accounting for 4.9 percent of the world market in the final quarter of 2013. True, that’s a distant fourth place (Samsung and Apple cornered almost half the market by themselves) but it’s not bad, especially considering Lenovo has no presence in North America: its smartphones are primarily available in Asia and emerging markets.

Lenovo S930 Angled

Buying Motorola gives Lenovo four big things:

  • A foothold in North America and Latin America: Motorola has deals with U.S. carriers (particularly Verizon), and is currently the the third largest smartphone maker in the U.S. – a distant third, far behind Samsung and Apple and basically tied with LG. But that’s literally the biggest presence in the American market that money could buy.
  • Major mobile engineering and design expertise: Motorola has more experience with phones and mobile technology than almost anyone on the planet, and while the company has certainly struggled, its recent Moto X and Moto G have been well-received.
  • Patents: Lenovo is getting access to (and in some cases ownership of) Motorola patents that other mobile companies (like Samsung and Apple) have to pay for.
  • The Motorola brand: Just as Lenovo kept IBM’s ThinkPad brand for its PC business, it plans to keep the highly-recognizable Motorola brand name for mobile devices. Consumers who might not be familiar with Lenovo probably are familiar with Motorola.

But Google also wins

Google will reap a lot of benefits from this sale. Here are a few.

  • No more conflict of interest: It’s no longer making both the Android operating system and Android devices, competing directly with its partners. Selling Motorola should help smooth relations with the likes of LG, HTC, Sony, and (particularly) Samsung. It will also hopefully spur competition and innovation in the Android ecosystem.
  • Motorola was a money pit: It’s no longer saddled with a money-losing hardware business. That should please Google investors.
  • It gets the patents: It’s keeping Motorola’s patents. They patents have not proven very effective at fending off legal challenges to Android, but patent battles take years to resolve: they may come through yet. In the meantime, the patents have been valuable to Google for generating agreements with Ericsson and Samsung, and they’ll continue to generate licensing fees for years to come.
  • A successful Lenovo is good for business: If Lenovo succeeds with Motorola, it will reduce Samsung’s influence on the broader Android ecosystem. Google and Samsung have been at odds over Android’s direction. Having another major Android vendor in the ecosystem will make it more difficult for Samsung to push Google around.
  • The Android ecosystem wins: There is now has a another major player with deep resources that – if it plays its cards right – can challenge Samsung. Lenovo already has massive manufacturing capacity, deep pockets, solid product lines, and customers / channel partners all over the world. If anyone can succeed with Motorola, it’s probably Lenovo.

… and who loses?

If there are winners, there have to be losers, right?


Samsung: The Korean giant loses because its days of dominating the Android platform could be numbered. Let’s face it: Google has never been very good at selling Android hardware. The various Nexus products are popular with developers but haven’t gotten much traction with consumers, and Google was always lukewarm about Motorola’s phone business, preferring to keep it at arm’s length. Lenovo, on the other hand, has both the resources and the willpower to make Motorola very competitive on a global scale. Samsung could have a fight on its hands.

Keep in mind that Samsung is also a winner because Google is no longer in the Android device business. Sure, Google will continue to make its Nexus line, partnering with the likes of Acer, Asus, and even Samsung to produce devices. But Samsung has to be pleased it no longer has to compete directly with a Google subsidiary on Android. The timing of its new patent-sharing agreement with Google probably isn’t a coincidence.

Motorola: Sadly, Moto might be the biggest loser in this deal. The company has lost money for years; it’s seen itself acquired, carved up, sold off, and had more than 20 percent of its people jettisoned – and now it’s just been sold again. That turmoil weighs heavily on morale. Motorola does have a lot of talent, but those employees are probably asking themselves serious questions. In trying to put a happy face on the Lenovo acquisition, the best Motorola CEO Dennis Woodside could do was express satisfaction that Motorola has a “brand new steward.” Even Motorola’s leaders see the company as a wallflower that needs a chaperone to the big dance.

We might lose out, too

We’re not sure if we’ll be winners or losers. Motorola has picked up some steam lately with its Moto X and Moto G devices – the Moto G in particular has gained traction as a solid entry-level Android phone. Hopefully, injecting Lenovo’s resources and willpower will let Motorola build on those successes and become a serious, top-tier player in the Android ecosystem. More choice is always good. Plus, the Motorola brand goes all the way back to the 1930s, when the company got started in car radios. It’d be a shame to see Motorola fade away. But it could, and future devices may not be as affordable as the Moto X and G.

Editors' Recommendations

What is 5G UW? The real meaning behind the icon on your phone
Woman holding up smartphone with speed test results on Verizon 5G Ultra Wideband network.

You've probably noticed that there's been much more hype around 5G than for any of the wireless technologies that came before. Some of that is just marketing, of course; we are living in an increasingly connected era, and there are far more people toting smartphones now than there were in 2012 when 4G/LTE was just beginning to go mainstream. However, it's also not an exaggeration to say that with considerably faster speeds and the ability to handle many more devices, 5G is a much bigger step into the next stage of global connectivity. You've also probably noticed it yourself with a "5G UW" icon at the top of your phone.

As with most new technologies, 5G comes with some new challenges for both carriers and consumers. One of the most significant of these has been working out the best way to deploy 5G services across the much wider range of frequencies that it's capable of operating on. This wasn't nearly as significant a problem in the days of 3G and 4G/LTE services, which all operated in a much narrower range of radio spectrum.

Read more
Pixel Watch update brings a much-requested Apple Watch feature
Man using the Google Pixel Watch's app menu.

The Pixel Watch is a solid first outing as Google's debut smartwatch. However, it's still lacking a handful of features that early adopters have been requesting that are found on similar devices. Luckily, today marks the start of the rollout of one frequently requested feature: fall detection.

Fall detection is a crucial health and safety feature that all smartwatches are better for having, and now the Pixel Watch is finally joining the ranks of the Apple Watch and the Galaxy Watch with its addition.

Read more
These Android apps are spying on you — and there’s no easy way to stop them
Illustration of a giant eye stalking through a phone

Android’s security woes need no introduction, but another threat that hasn’t received its fair share of awareness relates to spyware and stalkerware apps. These apps can secretly be installed on a victim’s phone to monitor their activity and can be exploited to harass victims of domestic abuse and engage in online stalking. All someone needs is physical access to the victim's phone to install these apps, which is not too difficult in cases of domestic abuse.

Call it an app-fueled version of AirTag stalking, but on steroids, because these spyware apps can steal everything including messages, call logs, emails, photos, and videos. Some can even activate the microphone and the camera, and secretly transfer these recordings to a remote server where the abuser can access it. Since Google Play's policies don't allow stalking apps, these apps are sold via third-party websites and need to be sideloaded.

Read more