Skip to main content

ITC finds limited infringement in Kodak/Apple dispute

Image used with permission by copyright holder

The U.S. International Trade Commission has finally weighed in on Kodak’s patent infringement case against Apple and RIM—and there wasn’t much good news for the photography giant. Although the federal agency did find some limited instances of patent infringement, the ITC essentially upheld the findings of one of its judges earlier this year that found neither Apple nor RIM were infringing on Kodak technology. Although the ruling modified some of the terms of the suit and sent some points back for further review—and Kodak could still win on those points—the commission’s decision reduces the likelihood that Kodak will see a major payday in the form of a settlement or damages.

Kodak shares have fallen significantly on the ruling, partially because the company had recently been making statements to Bloomberg and other outlets that it believed the case could bring $1 billion or more its bottom line.

The commission’s ruling revised definitions for “motion processor” and “still processor” used in Kodak’s patent complaints and asked the judge in the case to re-examine the claims with the new definitions to determine if Kodak’s patent was infringed with those definitions. The commission also ruled that Apple and RIM did infringe on a Kodak patent under a revised definition of “at least three different colors,” as well as a patent covering “initiating capture of a still image while previewing a motion image.” However, the commission threw out Kodak’s claims of infringement in regard to flash photos (saying Kodak had waived rights to make the claim) and referred Kodaks claims on non-flash photos back to the original judge.

The commission has not ruled on any penalties.

Kodak said it was gratified for the commissions’ decision to modify the judge’s original ruling. “We remain extremely confident this case will ultimately conclude in Kodak’s favor,” said Kodak general counsel Laura G. Quatela, in a statement.

Neither RIM nor Apple has yet commented on the ruling.

Kodak’s infringement claims against RIM primarily center on technology for creating a still image during preview on a camera’s LCD display. Kodak won a case against South Korea’s Samsung back in 2009 that reportedly resulted in a settlement worth more than $900 million to Kodak.

Editors' Recommendations

Geoff Duncan
Former Digital Trends Contributor
Geoff Duncan writes, programs, edits, plays music, and delights in making software misbehave. He's probably the only member…
Apple finally releases iOS 14.5 with new privacy features and Find My app update
iPhone 12 models

After months of beta testing and delays, Apple has finally announced the release of iOS 14.5 and iPadOS 14.5, the latest and greatest versions of Apple's mobile operating systems featuring a series of long-awaited features.

Perhaps the most notable -- and most controversial -- new feature is App Tracking Transparency, also called ATT. The feature essentially allows users to determine whether or not apps are allowed to track them across other apps and services. This tracking tactic is used by the likes of Facebook and Google to collect data on users that could ultimately be used to advertise to them.

Read more
Researchers find a scary data vulnerability in Apple’s AirDrop
AirDrop options on an iPhone.

Hackers can tap into AirDrop data and pull your phone number or your email address. This issue has been known since 2019 and has yet to be patched or acknowledged by Apple, though it impacts almost 1.5 billion Apple devices today.

According to a report from security researchers at Germany's Technical University of Darmstadt, the core of this issue is the way in which AirDrop shares files between Apple devices using the address book and contacts list as an option by default. Per the researchers, since AirDrop leverages "a mutual authentication mechanism," to compare phone numbers, as well as email addresses, a hacker can easily intercept this information using "a Wi-Fi-capable device" that is nearby to an Apple user sharing through MacOS, iOS, or iPadOS via AirDrop. A proof of concept attack can be found on GitHub.

Read more
Six months in, I find the Apple Watch Series 6 incredibly boring
Adjusting Apple Watch on wrist.

I revisited the Apple Watch Series 6 last week, something I’ve done various times since its release, in-between periods of wearing other smartwatches and fitness trackers. Each time I put it on, I’m taken aback by the way it looks, feels on my wrist, and operates when compared to other wearables.

It’s just so boring. Where is the hand-in-a-tiger’s-mouth excitement, and the same level of surprise you would get by finding a grenade with the pin out, I get from other wearables? Even six months into the Series 6's life, Apple hasn’t added any of the eccentricities that make other smartwatches so unpredictable to own, preferring to keep the Apple Watch Series 6 running like a, um, well-oiled Swiss watch. What is it thinking?
Really Apple?
A week of wearing the Series 6 has highlighted where Apple has chosen and steadfastly maintained a completely different direction to its rivals. Let's start with notifications. When notifications arrive on my iPhone 12 Pro, they also arrive on my Apple Watch. Not sometimes, but all the time. I can’t believe how neatly formatted they are, and how other languages show up without a problem either.

Read more