Skip to main content
  1. Home
  2. Phones
  3. Mobile
  4. Features

This is the worst smartphone camera I used in 2024, and it’s not even close

Add as a preferred source on Google
Promotional image for OuttaFocus. Photo of a collection of smartphone cameras.
Andy Boxall / Digital Trends
Promotional image for OuttaFocus. Hand holding three smart phones.
This story is part of Andy Boxall's OuttaFocus series, covering smartphone cameras and photography.

I’ve already named my favorite camera phone of 2024, and the crown went to the fantastic Xiaomi 14 Ultra. The versatile Photography Kit makes it really special, and it has even replaced my DSLR several times when taking photos published on Digital Trends.

However, what about my worst camera phone of 2024? It turns out this was a much harder question to answer, but in the end, there could only be one.

Recommended Videos

So many phones have decent cameras

The back of the CMF Phone 1.
CMF Phone 1 Andy Boxall / Digital Trends

I’ve used and reviewed dozens of smartphones this year, so surely finding one or two that didn’t have a stellar camera should be no problem, right? Well, sort of. The problem is that even average phones have at least one perfectly acceptable camera on the back — almost regardless of their price.

Let’s take the CMF Phone 1 as an example. At the time of writing, it’s on offer for 170 British pounds, or about $215, making it one of the cheapest phones I’ve used in 2024. The phone will have undoubtedly been built to a price point, and the cost of the camera components will have been more important than whether it takes good photos or not. Yet, the camera is decent. No, it’s not feature-packed, but if you just want to take general photos, it won’t disappoint.

The back of the Redmi Note 13 Pro Plus.
Redmi Note 13 Pro Plus Andy Boxall / Digital Trends

The Redmi 13 Pro Plus is another good example of why it’s hard to choose a really terrible camera this year. The main 200-megapixel camera takes very good photos, and I was impressed by its use of color, but the rest of the three-camera setup was much worse. The 8MP wide-angle camera has been a scourge on phones for a while, and on the Redmi Note 13 Pro, it is accompanied by a useless 2MP macro camera, meaning everything aside from the main camera is an utter waste.

Some phones really do disappoint

The back of the Nokia 3210.
Nokia 3210 Andy Boxall / Digital Trends

The CMF Phone 1 and Redmi 13 Pro Plus don’t have bad cameras; they just have either bad elements or lack much versatility. These aren’t crimes and simply just represent the lower end of the market. The Nuu B30 Pro suffers in the same way, as does the Tecno Pova 6 Pro.  Now that we’ve talked about average-at-best cameras, let’s get down to the nitty-gritty of choosing the worst camera of 2024.

It’s almost too obvious to choose the Nokia 3210. No one in their right mind would expect its 2MP fixed-focus camera to take anything but bad photos, and sure enough, it really did take terrible photos. It’s not sold as a camera phone to rival the Google Pixel 9 and instead promises to help you cure your smartphone addiction. One surefire way to do this is with a rubbish camera, so the Nokia 3210 is well on its way to make you never want to pick it up again.

The back of the Asus ROG Phone 9 Pro.
Asus ROG Phone 9 Pro Andy Boxall / Digital Trends

It’s a similar situation with the Asus ROG Phone 9 Pro, which is a gaming phone and not a camera phone. However, Asus works hard to make the camera appear to be more than an afterthought, and with the ROG Phone 8 Pro, it took a positive step forward. However, after changing the main camera sensor for the most recent model, quality took a hit. It’s a shame, especially as it’s not a cheap phone, but I don’t think anyone will be buying the ROG Phone 9 Pro specifically for the camera anyway.

The big losers

Vision mode on the Rabbit R1, identifying a nearby tree.
Rabbit R1 Joe Maring / Digital Trends

That’s a lot of phones with cameras that aren’t very good, but they aren’t the worst of the year. In fact, they’re not even close. There were three devices that immediately came to mind when I thought about bad cameras this year, but there’s still only one clear winner.

I didn’t use the Moto G 5G 2024, and the camera certainly didn’t impress Digital Trends’ Christine Romero-Chan, but seeing as I didn’t actually use it, it only gets a (dis)honorable mention here. Instead, my runner-up is a wild card, as technically, it’s not really a phone. I’m talking about the Rabbit R1.

The AI gadget hasn’t won many plaudits since its release, earning a single star in our review, but it does have a camera that you can use for visual search and other AI features, and it saves the snapshot each time in the Rabbit Hole online inventory for you to look back on in days to come. Unfortunately, the 8MP camera takes bad photos, and even though I had fun converting them over into AI-reimagined images, there’s something incredibly disappointing about the decision to equip the R1 with such an underwhelming camera when a better camera could have given it at least one redeeming feature.

A person holding the Punkt MC02.
Punkt MC-02 Andy Boxall / Digital Trends

Which leaves us with the “winner.” The worst camera phone I’ve used in 2024 is the Punkt MC02, and none of the others even come close to it. It’s a phone so bad I couldn’t review it. There’s a 64MP main camera and another stupid 8MP wide-angle camera on the back, and the photos it took were all awful.

But it’s not just the picture quality that made the Punkt MC02 the year’s worst — it’s everything around it. The camera app was poorly designed, buggy, and seemingly unfinished, making the act of using it at all quite painful, and you had to pay $750 and potentially a monthly subscription after a year of ownership for the hateful thing.

Is it still as bad?

I want to be fair in my judgment of the Punkt MC02, so I took it out of the box, started it up, applied any updates, and went out to take a few photos with both it and the iPhone 16 Pro Max.

The camera app hasn’t improved. You still need to select and deselect the main and wide-angle cameras under the More menu, and it stays in the same mode until you switch from one to the other. There is still no option to add grid lines for shot composition. The zoom slider is haphazardly designed, slow, and unreliable to operate, and it takes a beat too long to actually take a photo after pressing the shutter release. It’s like Punkt made no effort at all with the camera app and certainly hasn’t addressed anything I noticed when I first used the phone eight months ago.

How about the photos? Are there any big changes? No. They are dire. The amount of noise in almost all the photos I took is shocking; there are masses of smoothing, bad edge enhancement, and a sad lack of detail. In lowish indoor light, the results are woeful. See the photo of the cat for evidence of how it struggles not just with dim indoor light, but also with focus. The fact that the $200 CMF Phone 1 has a considerably better, much more usable, and definitely more consumer-friendly camera than the $750 Punkt MC02 is another reason that the latter was the obvious choice for the year’s worst award.

A person holding the Punkt MC-02.
Andy Boxall / Digital Trends

The good news is the Punkt MC02 is very much an outlier, and as I hope it is clear, choosing a phone with an all-around disappointing camera is actually quite hard these days. Provided you don’t buy the Punkt, the Nokia 3210, or the Moto G — and if you do, I’ll assume you clearly have no interest in the cameras — the main camera, at the very least, should be perfectly usable on the majority of phones, in most everyday situations.

We should be happy that this is the situation at the end of 2024, rather than angry at any of the phones mentioned here.

Andy Boxall
Andy has written about mobile technology for almost a decade. From 2G to 5G and smartphone to smartwatch, Andy knows tech.
Viaim RecDot Review: These AI earbuds sounds great and also take notes for you
These earbuds do the one thing they set out to do, and they do it extremely well.
Viaiam RecDot in-ear

Button Text

Quick Take

Read more
Apple’s new Upgrade plan looks cheap until you remember who owns the device
Apple Upgrade could be perfect for serial upgraders. But most people aren't one
Computer, Electronics, Laptop

Apple has found a great way to make an expensive iPhone more approachable. Apple Upgrade lets customers lease eligible devices through Klarna, with iPhone terms lasting 12 or 24 months. At the end, you can return the device, begin another lease, or pay the remaining amount to own it.

My initial reaction focused heavily on the value customers lose by returning an iPhone they could have sold or traded. While that concern is still valid, the program makes considerably more sense for a select group of people who already replace their iPhones every year. But the question is... how many people actually do that?

Read more
Pixel 11 Pro Fold appears in official-looking images, and its design leaves me underwhelmed
Google’s next foldable looks too similar to the Pixel 10 Pro Fold
Electronics, Mobile Phone, Phone

Previous CAD renders had already lowered my expectations for the Pixel 11 Pro Fold. The latest promotional material shared by Evan Blass through the Leakmail newsletter leaves little hope of anything beyond a new paint job and design tweaks so minor that most people would struggle to notice them without looking closely.

The phone looks disappointingly similar to the Pixel 10 Pro Fold, retaining the same proportions, rounded corners, and unusual camera island. I have never liked the way Google stacks what look like two smaller Pixel camera visors on top of each other. It feels awkward rather than cohesive.

Read more