Skip to main content
  1. Home
  2. Phones
  3. Mobile
  4. Legacy Archives

Senate study says phone bill ‘cramming’ is costing us millions

Add as a preferred source on Google

A U.S. Senate study, commissioned by the Commerce Committee, has called out mobile networks on the practice of “cramming,” which it says has cost mobile users “hundreds of millions of dollars over the past several years.” Cramming refers to small, sometimes overlooked charges added to your monthly mobile bill, usually originating from third-party companies that sell ringtones, news sent by SMS, horoscopes, and other similar services.

The Senate report accuses networks of “profiting tremendously” from the practice, and described the overcharging as a “voluntary industry oversight,” blaming the Mobile Marketing Association, and the CTIA, for not doing more to close the billing loopholes which allow other companies to add charges to your phone bill. The problem is networks take between 30 and 40 percent of the crammed charges, meaning there is little incentive to crack down.

Recommended Videos

Several examples related to the scale of the problem are provided in the Senate’s report. In 2012, it says, $191 million worth of crammed charges were placed on mobile bills in California alone, while another carrier reportedly billed $250 million nationwide for crammed services in 2011. This means there’s plenty of money to go round, and despite some strict rules on cramming, the third-party firms are finding evermore inventive ways of getting you to sign up.

Recently, most networks stopped billing for what’s known as a Premium Short Message Service, or PSMS, which can be used for cramming. It involves you agreeing to download a ringtone, or get dating tips by SMS, and thanks to some suspect fine print, these services can often have an ongoing monthly fee attached. However, unscrupulous companies turned to other methods of getting their charges on your bill, and the practice continues. Networks will refund bogus, or unwanted charges if you inform them, but it’s not always easy to identify them on complex bills, particularly those where the monthly amount alters.

Although the Senate report provides some best practice guidelines for the industry, and promises to continue monitoring the situation, it’s probably going to come down to you to stop random charges from bumping up your bill. The FTC recommends you look out for them under headings like miscellaneous, and to be mindful of words like subscription, member fee, or activation. If you see something that doesn’t look right, contact your network and ask for an explanation.

Andy Boxall
Andy has written about mobile technology for almost a decade. From 2G to 5G and smartphone to smartwatch, Andy knows tech.
Topics
Apple’s Siri AI is free, until you actually start using it
Turns out "unlimited" AI might come with an asterisk and an iCloud+ upgrade prompt.
Siri Ai on iPhone

Apple's latest earnings call had plenty of good news: record iPhone revenue, a record June quarter, and non-stop excitement about Siri AI. But buried inside the analyst Q&A was a detail that caught my attention: Apple all but confirmed that heavy Siri AI users could eventually need a bigger iCloud+ plan to keep using it comfortably.

Will heavy Siri AI users need to pay more?

Read more
Viaim RecDot Review: These AI earbuds sounds great and also take notes for you
These earbuds do the one thing they set out to do, and they do it extremely well.
Viaiam RecDot in-ear

Button Text

Quick Take

Read more
Apple’s new Upgrade plan looks cheap until you remember who owns the device
Apple Upgrade could be perfect for serial upgraders. But most people aren't one
Computer, Electronics, Laptop

Apple has found a great way to make an expensive iPhone more approachable. Apple Upgrade lets customers lease eligible devices through Klarna, with iPhone terms lasting 12 or 24 months. At the end, you can return the device, begin another lease, or pay the remaining amount to own it.

My initial reaction focused heavily on the value customers lose by returning an iPhone they could have sold or traded. While that concern is still valid, the program makes considerably more sense for a select group of people who already replace their iPhones every year. But the question is... how many people actually do that?

Read more