Skip to main content
  1. Home
  2. Phones
  3. Business
  4. Mobile
  5. News

Sprint leaves its cramming ways in the past with a $50 million settlement

Add as a preferred source on Google

Sprint was caught red-handed by the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) and the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) back in May over “mobile cramming” charges, and now a judge approved a settlement that’s part of Sprint’s larger $68 million fine, reports Reuters.

The settlement, approved by U.S. District Court Judge William Pauley, has Sprint forking over $50 million to the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB). The remaining $18 million, meanwhile, will be doled out to federal and state fines. According to the settlement, the $50 million will be paid back to customers who were affected by Sprint’s cramming practices over a period of 10 years.

Recommended Videos

However, the settlement isn’t the end of things for either Sprint or the CFPB. Back when Sprint was slapped with the $68 million fine in May, Judge Pauley didn’t approve the agreement because both sides did not include enough details in the initially-filed papers. In addition, according to Reuters, Judge Pauley complained that entities wishing to receive approval for settlements see judges as nothing more than formality and expect a rubber stamp. Even though Judge Pauley did sign off on the agreement Tuesday, he didn’t reveal whether both Sprint and the CFPB addressed those concerns.

The charges stem from a particularly shady method of revenue collection, which involved Sprint adding seemingly minor increases to its customers’ bills for small fines and services, a practice known as cramming. The problem is, these additions add up, resulting in the monthly bill that’s much larger than what it actually should be. Sprint wasn’t the only one busted, though, as Verizon, AT&T, and T-Mobile were also fined for cramming.

After yesterday’s settlement, Verizon is the sole carrier that has yet to settle. In total, Verizon was fined $90 million for its cramming practices. Regardless, current and former Verizon customers can submit claims for refunds here, while Sprint customers can do so here. If you do submit a claim, don’t expect a check in your mailbox for at least a couple of months, as customers have until December 31, 2015 if they have had any un-refunded PSMS charges billed since July 1, 2010.

Williams Pelegrin
Williams is an avid New York Yankees fan, speaks Spanish, resides in Colorado, and has an affinity for Frosted Flakes. Send…
Viaim RecDot Review: These AI earbuds sounds great and also take notes for you
These earbuds do the one thing they set out to do, and they do it extremely well.
Viaiam RecDot in-ear

Button Text

Quick Take

Read more
Apple’s new Upgrade plan looks cheap until you remember who owns the device
Apple Upgrade could be perfect for serial upgraders. But most people aren't one
Computer, Electronics, Laptop

Apple has found a great way to make an expensive iPhone more approachable. Apple Upgrade lets customers lease eligible devices through Klarna, with iPhone terms lasting 12 or 24 months. At the end, you can return the device, begin another lease, or pay the remaining amount to own it.

My initial reaction focused heavily on the value customers lose by returning an iPhone they could have sold or traded. While that concern is still valid, the program makes considerably more sense for a select group of people who already replace their iPhones every year. But the question is... how many people actually do that?

Read more
Pixel 11 Pro Fold appears in official-looking images, and its design leaves me underwhelmed
Google’s next foldable looks too similar to the Pixel 10 Pro Fold
Electronics, Mobile Phone, Phone

Previous CAD renders had already lowered my expectations for the Pixel 11 Pro Fold. The latest promotional material shared by Evan Blass through the Leakmail newsletter leaves little hope of anything beyond a new paint job and design tweaks so minor that most people would struggle to notice them without looking closely.

The phone looks disappointingly similar to the Pixel 10 Pro Fold, retaining the same proportions, rounded corners, and unusual camera island. I have never liked the way Google stacks what look like two smaller Pixel camera visors on top of each other. It feels awkward rather than cohesive.

Read more