Skip to main content

Facebook ‘Likes’ are protected by the First Amendment

facebook like protected by the first amendment
Image used with permission by copyright holder

“Likes” on Facebook are now protected by the First Amendment, thanks to a ruling by the Fourth U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals.

The court ruled on the side of Bobby Bland, a former deputy sheriff from Hampton, Va., who says he and other employees were fired for ‘liking’ the Facebook page of his boss’s opponent. Their boss, sheriff B.J. Roberts, won his race and promptly fired the dissenting employees. He said the firings were the result of budget cuts and the workers’ disruption of office dynamics. Suspecting that the dismissal had less to do with the budget and more to do with disliking the “likes,” Bland and his fellow Facebook mutineers took the case to court.

In 2012, The U.S. District Court of Eastern Virginia didn’t buy their argument that the termination violated their First Amendment rights, and dismissed the case. Judge Raymond Jackson noted that Facebook posts were protected, but didn’t think “likes” made the cut. “Simply liking a Facebook page is insufficient. It is not the kind of substantive statement that has previously warranted constitutional protection,” he wrote in his opinion. 

But a different judge saw the situation from another perspective. Chief Judge William B. Traxler Jr. saw no difference between a “like” and actually writing that you like something. “”On the most basic level, clicking on the ‘Like’ button literally causes to be published the statement that the user ‘likes’ something, which is itself a substantive statement,” he wrote

The ruling reinforced the argument of one of the plaintiffs, Daniel R. Carter Jr., who explicitly defended himself by saying a “like” fell under protected speech. 

This is an important decision for the First Amendment because it extends free speech protections to a simple click of the mouse. It’s a common sense ruling, since publicly “liking” something on Facebook is a clear endorsement, even if it is one that requires zero creative thinking. The line of thinking the judge used to arrive at this decision would protect all sorts of actions on social media, such as “favoriting” a tweet or pressing the heart button under an Instagram photo. 

Of course, you may be wondering why this case was brought to court at all — why shouldn’t a sheriff be able to fire people who work for him who expressed support for another candidate? While employees in the private sector can be fired for comments deemed inappropriate, public servants often have more robust employment protections in place that safeguard their jobs if they express their political views. That may be the case here. 

Editors' Recommendations

Kate Knibbs
Former Digital Trends Contributor
Kate Knibbs is a writer from Chicago. She is very happy that her borderline-unhealthy Internet habits are rewarded with a…
Online platforms like Facebook are losing yet another ‘infodemic’ war
Man in Wuhan wearing a mask amid coronavirus outbreak

As the world grapples with the coronavirus outbreak, the overlords of the internet’s biggest communication channels have been busy waging a different war: One against misinformation. The COVID-19 epidemic, which has so far infected nearly 98,000 people in 86 countries, has rapidly sparked yet another "infodemic" for online platforms like Facebook and YouTube, inundating them with an around-the-clock avalanche of misleading ads, fake news, conspiracy theory posts, and a whole lot more.

(For the uninitiated, an infodemic is a large amount of information about a problem that is viewed as being a detriment to its solution.)

Read more
Facebook will protect your data — as long as no one’s paying them for it
Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg speaking on a panel at the Paley Center for Media

At a Capitol Hill hearing Tuesday — no, not the one with the impeachment and such — Sen. Dick Durbin (D-Illinois) asked Jay Sullivan, Facebook’s product management director for privacy and integrity in Messenger, whether Facebook collected any data from its Messenger Kids app. It was the exact same question, Durbin said, that he had posed to Mark Zuckerberg last year, when he received an answer he deemed unsatisfactory.

“I have significant concerns that the data gathered by this app might be used or sold,” Durbin told Sullivan. “[Zuckerberg] responded, ‘in general, that data is not going to be shared with third parties.’ I said his use of that terms was ‘provocative and worrisome.'” Durbin then asked Sullivan the same question. “Is your answer that there is no information collected via Messenger Kids that is shared by Facebook to any third parties?”

Read more
Documents show Facebook used user data as bargaining chip against competitors
mark zuckerberg speaking in front of giant digital lock

Leaked documents show that Facebook used user data as a bargaining chip with its advertising partners and leveraged the data against its competitors. 

NBC News first reported on the confidential documents in April that contained Facebook’s internal communications from 2011-2015 as part of an ongoing lawsuit. The newly leaked documents — about 7,000 pages in total — shed light on how CEO Mark Zuckerberg used users’ data as leverage for company partnerships.

Read more