Skip to main content
  1. Home
  2. Tablets
  3. Apple
  4. Computing
  5. s

Why Apple Arcade isn’t the cross-platform utopia we were promised

Add as a preferred source on Google

Despite calls from the press and some members of the public for Apple to merge iOS and MacOS, the tech giant continues to plug its fingers in its ears and insist it’s not happening. And you know what? It’s the right approach. But weirdly, Apple is accidentally demonstrating what a disaster this merger would be using one of its own products: Apple Arcade.

You see, Apple Arcade is a showcase for all that’s wrong with taking two very different operating systems and mashing them together into a mixed-up medley where no one wins. Because developers have to make games that work on the tiniest iPhone and the largest iMac, they are forced into compromises that weaken the games on both platforms.

Recommended Videos

To be clear, there are reams of excellent Apple Arcade games. My beef is more with the way the platform works and its attempt to cater to all possible audiences. If Apple has any sense, it will take its own advice and fix this problem.

The Mac misses out

Apple Arcade games appearing on a MacBook, iPad, and iPhone.
Image used with permission by copyright holder

I recently started playing Fantasian on Apple Arcade, a JRPG developed by Hironobu Sakaguchi, the creator of the Final Fantasy series. With that kind of resumé, I was expecting a lot from his latest work. Instead, I got something that had plenty of great ideas but was held back by Apple Arcade.

Load up Fantasian for the first time, and you quickly see its gimmick: Its world spaces take the form of handcrafted dioramas, with characters and NPCs digitally superimposed. On an iPhone, these look absolutely beautiful, and they are still pretty eye-catching on a Mac — until you look a little closer, whereupon they become a little blurry and low-res. I can only surmise this is due to the developers having to optimize the textures for a smaller screen, leaving Mac users out in the cold.

And then there are the controls. Most Mac games give you a fairly standard set of hotkeys: M for map, J for journal, I for inventory, and so on. Sometimes they vary, but the point is you always have lots of quick shortcuts at your disposal. In Fantasian, you only get two: C opens the menu and S launches a designated shortcut. There are no concessions for gamers decked out with a keyboard and mouse, only the limited options available to iOS players.

When you make it into the menu, every button is enormous, designed for fat fingers instead of precise mouse pointers. It’s pretty obvious who the developers were aiming for when they made Fantasian.

But I can’t really blame them here. They had to make a choice because games on Apple Arcade cannot have different versions for different platforms. In this case, Mac players have not only missed out on much-needed optimizations, but they have also been given a game version that doesn’t even look right on their computer. And the blame for that lands squarely at the feet of Apple.

More than just visuals

A gameplay scene from Divinity: Original Sin 2.
Divinity: Original Sin 2 Image used with permission by copyright holder

The problems with games on Apple Arcade go deeper than their graphical fidelity. Gamers on MacOS and gamers on iOS have different sets of expectations — the latter tend to gravitate toward shorter gaming sessions, while the former are much more accustomed to marathon shifts at the keyboard. This means the types of games (and the gameplay within them) differs across platforms.

But Apple Arcade cannot accommodate that. Gaming experiences have to be the same whether they are played on an iPhone, an iPad, an Apple TV, or a Mac. Again, Fantasian shows where that idea falls down.

Its combat is incredibly simplistic: Hit, get hit back, hit again, ad infinitum. Compare that to RPG royalty like Divinity: Original Sin 2, where combat is deep, layered, and highly tactical. Divinity is on the Mac and iPad, where larger screens allow for more buttons and more complex gameplay, but it is noticeably absent from the iPhone. It shows cross-platform games absolutely can work, but only if they consider the needs of each device they run on. Apple Arcade bulldozes through all of that.

Bad for developers, bad for gamers

Fantasian being played in Apple Arcade on a Mac Mini.
Fantasian for Mac Image used with permission by copyright holder

There is no doubt that Apple Arcade offers a lot of opportunities to developers and gamers alike. Developers can get their wares in front of gamers no matter their preferred (Apple) platform, while gamers get access to an ever-expanding library of games that work wherever they want to play them.

But in getting to this stage, too many compromises have to be made, from the visuals to the gameplay to the performance. When your game needs to work smoothly on radically different devices, developers have to aim for the lowest common denominator — and everything else suffers.

This is exactly what Apple has long warned about when dismissing calls to merge iOS and MacOS: That the resulting hybrid would be too compromised, without any of the unique features that make each system great. Yet this is precisely what we get with Apple Arcade.

Apple wants us to see its devices as proper gaming platforms, but it needs to be more focused if it is going to be taken seriously, at least on the Mac. Fantasian is just one example, but every Apple Arcade game has to face the same choices and barriers. As a Mac gamer, I don’t like suggesting this, but perhaps it is time to take the Mac out of the Apple Arcade equation. The result might be better for everyone.

Alex Blake
Alex Blake has been working with Digital Trends since 2019, where he spends most of his time writing about Mac computers…
A ‘meh’ iPad Pro refresh lands in 2027 with a cooling boost to handle your demanding workloads
Apple may bring vapor chamber cooling to the iPad Pro in 2027
Apple iPad Pro 2025 on a table

Apple’s next iPad Pro may not look dramatically different, but it could get one upgrade that makes a lot of sense for an ultra-thin tablet. Better cooling.

According to Bloomberg, Apple is testing four new iPad Pro models planned for spring 2027. The tablets are expected to keep the current 11-inch and 13-inch display sizes, while focusing mostly on internal improvements, including faster chips. Apple has also reportedly tested a vapor chamber cooling system for the iPad Pro, which could help improve sustained performance and reduce overheating.

Read more
Huawei MatePad Pro Max beats Apple’s iPad Pro to become the thinnest 13-inch tablet
Huawei takes aim at Apple's iPad Pro with an ultra-thin flagship tablet
Huawei MatePad Pro Max

Huawei has officially begun selling the MatePad Pro Max in Germany, bringing its flagship tablet to Europe nearly two months after its global debut. The company is making one claim louder than any other: at 4.7mm, the MatePad Pro Max is now thinner than Apple's 13-inch iPad Pro, which measures 5.3mm. That makes it one of the slimmest large-screen tablets currently available. The question, however, is whether being the thinnest is enough to convince buyers in a market where software ecosystems often matter more than hardware.

An engineering achievement that comes with familiar compromises

Read more
A new OLED gaming tablet from Red Magic puts liquid cooling on display
Red Magic’s compact gaming tablet gets a 185Hz OLED screen, visible cooling and 80W charging
Redmagic Gaming Tablet 5 Pro Design

After multiple teasers, Red Magic has finally launched its new compact gaming tablet in the Chinese market. Dubbed the Gaming Tablet 5 Pro, the device is built around the same idea that has made Red Magic phones stand out: high-end gaming hardware, aggressive cooling, and a design that does not try to hide what it is.

The tablet will not stay limited to China. Red Magic says the Gaming Tablet 5 Pro will launch globally as the Red Magic Astra 2 Gaming Tablet, with international pricing and availability set to be announced on July 17.

Read more