Skip to main content
  1. Home
  2. Computing
  3. Mobile
  4. News

Intel shamelessly enticing OEMs to use upcoming ‘Apollo Lake’ CPUs during IDF 2016

Add as a preferred source on Google

Just as Intel pushed the idea of a super-thin form factor with a price tag below $1,000 called the Ultrabook, the company is now enticing manufacturers to jump on the Cloudbook bandwagon. Unlike the Ultrabook, these solutions don’t aim for the thin but go for the gold, specifically sales gold — the lucrative sub-$270 market. They’re getting to be quite popular, supposedly selling more than 5 million units since Intel introduced them back in late 2014.

This week, Intel is pushing manufacturers to use its just-announced “Apollo Lake” processors in these Cloudbooks during its Intel Developer Forum in China. Previous Cloudbook solutions packed Celeron, Pentium, and Atom chips based on “Braswell” and “Bay Trail-M” architectures. The new Apollo Lake processors that Intel wants OEMs to use are expected to ship in the second half of 2016.

Recommended Videos

So what makes a Cloudbook? Consider them to be Chromebook rivals, but with the Windows platform instead of Google’s Chrome OS. They’re highly thin because they have no hard drives or optical drives, relying instead on flash-based storage, ranging in size between 2GB and 32GB (although some have 64GB). Intel says that every OEM is making a Cloudbook, with solutions ranging from 11.6/13.3/14-inch clamshells to 11.6-inch convertibles.

For instance, Acer has the Aspire One Cloudbook in four different flavors. They’re based on the dual-core Intel Celeron N3050 processor clocked at a meager 1.6GHz, 2GB of DDR3L memory, and Windows 10 Home. The screen options range from 11.6 inches to 14 inches while the storage options span from 32GB to 64GB of flash-based storage. Prices range from $190 to $250, making them look super tasty to penny pinchers.

The reference design Intel is offering to OEMs includes an 11.6-inch screen with a 1,920 x 1,080 resolution and an optional 10-point touch input. On the memory front, the design uses 4GB of LPDDR3 RAM from Samsung while providing 64GB of storage via an M.2 SSD and/or 32GB of eMMC 5.0-based storage.

Other ingredients consist of Wireless AC connectivity with Bluetooth 4.1, an optional built-in camera, four sensors, a USB Type-C port, and a few battery options. The HD audio codec is provided by Realktek whereas the device’s charger will be provided by Texas Instruments. However, Intel’s slides pulled from the show point out that the components chosen for the reference design are CTE-friendly (China Tech Ecosystem) and are not only low cost, but are currently available in the supply chain.

Some of the Apollo Lake features promoted by Intel include an improved CPU performance thanks to a new architecture, hardware accelerated codecs, and a ninth-generation graphics engine. Improved battery life is another strong feature as well as the ability to add more USB ports, MIPI capabilities, mixed memory support, and a higher cost reduction on power delivery.

According to Intel, the Apollo Lake platform “delivers the foundation for a great entry design.” For an affordable price, consumers can supposedly work all day on a single charge, play HD video without a hitch, and enjoy a “beautiful, sleek, portable” design. Cloudbooks currently cost between $169 and $269, making them great products for first-time buyers and students.

As previously stated, Intel is launching its Apollo Lake processors in the second half of 2016, and it will likely follow its Broadwell-E processor family launch planned for Computex 2016, which takes place in Taipei from May 31 to June 4. We expect to hear hear more about Intel’s Apollo Lake plans during this event if the company doesn’t spill more of the beans this week during IDF 2016.

Kevin Parrish
Kevin started taking PCs apart in the 90s when Quake was on the way and his PC lacked the required components. Since then…
Google Chrome can now find what you need in Gmail before you even ask
Soon digging through your Gmail will be a thing of the past.
Google Chrome

Google Chrome's autofill has always been pretty handy for filling in addresses, passwords, and payment information. Now, the feature could be getting ever better thanks to better integration with Gmail. The company will soon allow the browser to dig through your Gmail inbox and pull out information you would otherwise spend several minutes hunting for.

According to Google's official announcement, Chrome's enhanced autofill can now use Gemini with Personal Intelligence to retrieve order numbers, package tracking details, and flight booking information directly from Gmail.

Read more
The new MacBook Pro has a stabilized camera and it’s a practical perk hiding in plain sight
Apple's touchscreen MacBook Pro promises steadier video calls when fingers hit the display, with a redesigned hinge helping reduce screen wobble
MacBook Pro Stabilization

The new MacBook Pro has a camera upgrade worth a closer look amid the touchscreen and OLED excitement. Apple says its advanced video stabilization keeps the camera feed steady when you touch the display, so tapping through a document during a call shouldn't send a tremor through everyone else's screen.

A touchscreen invites people to prod the lid while its camera is pointed at their face. Accounting for what the person watching sees is a sensible detail to build around that change.

Read more
I found a smart reason to buy Apple’s touchscreen MacBook, and it’s Xcode
Apple's $2,899 MacBook Pro might be a developer's dream
Apple-MacBook-Pro-with-PROLED-XDR-Display-lifestyle

Apple has just introduced a new touchscreen MacBook Pro, and the moment I saw the press material, I was intrigued owing to one crucial upgrade – support for touch input on its OLED screen. Apple's response to people asking for a touchscreen-enabled MacBook used to be that macOS was never built to support a touch interface. There is plenty of hot chatter going on about the"need for a touchscreen on a MacBook" in the first place, and given Apple's historical dismissal of a touch-sensitive display on Macs, it's somewhat justified.

I've used plenty of touchscreen Windows laptops over the years, but I didn't expect to pay nearly $3,000 for Apple's own take on such a notebook. But as someone who just got into the world of app development, I can see a genuinely compelling reason for the upgrade. Or maybe, it's just me trying to convince myself that there's a genuinely practical benefit to spending nearly three thousand dollars on a new laptop, ditching one that is already working fine for me.

Read more